Economy April 16, 2026 05:20 AM

BoE governor warns of 'very big energy shock' as Middle East tensions complicate rate outlook

Andrew Bailey says the Bank will wait for data before acting ahead of its April policy meeting as energy costs threaten to lift UK prices

By Sofia Navarro
BoE governor warns of 'very big energy shock' as Middle East tensions complicate rate outlook

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey told the BBC at the IMF meeting in Washington that rising oil and gas prices linked to the Middle East conflict represent a "very big energy shock" that could feed into UK inflation. He said the Bank will not pre-empt its 30 April policy decision and is waiting for clearer data on the economic pass-through, while noting prior signs that labour market softening and weaker business ability to raise prices may limit persistent inflation. Bailey also said he had no immediate concerns about the banking system but warned resilience could be tested if the conflict endures.

Key Points

  • Rising oil and gas prices from the Middle East conflict represent a "very big energy shock" that could push up UK consumer prices - sectors affected include energy, consumer goods, and households.
  • The Bank of England will not rush decisions ahead of its 30 April policy meeting and is awaiting data on how the shock transmits into the UK economy - this affects monetary policy and financial markets.
  • Prior signs of a softening labour market and firms' reduced ability to pass on price increases suggest inflation may be less likely to become persistent - implications for wages, retail, and services sectors.

The Bank of England faces complex choices on interest rates as higher energy prices arising from the Middle East conflict threaten to push consumer prices higher, Governor Andrew Bailey said in remarks to the BBC delivered at the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington.

Bailey described the situation as a "very big energy shock," noting that increases in oil and gas costs will likely filter through to prices. He emphasised, however, that the central bank would not rush to a decision ahead of its 30 April meeting, reflecting the many uncertainties around how the shock will unfold and how it will transmit to the UK economy.

"There’s really difficult judgments to be made," Bailey said. "We’re not going to rush to judgments on those things, because there are a lot of uncertainties around this, not just how it’s going to play out, but also how it’s going to pass through into the UK economy."

The governor said the Bank is continuing to gather and assess data on how the conflict is affecting UK prices and activity. He highlighted the UK's dependence on gas as a source of energy, saying that dependence would amplify the impact, and that the duration of the conflict will be a key determinant of the ultimate effect.


Bailey said the Bank has taken into account guidance from the IMF, which warned central banks not to hastily raise borrowing costs in the wake of the Middle East conflict.

He also pointed to domestic signs that predated the conflict: the labour market had been showing signs of softening, and companies were finding it harder to pass cost increases through to customers. Those conditions, Bailey suggested, reduce the likelihood that inflation will become persistent.

Turning to the financial system, Bailey said he had no current concerns about banking stability. At the same time, he warned that the resilience underpinning the system could be exhausted if the conflict continued for an extended period.

The governor’s comments framed the Bank's approach as cautious and data-driven, prioritising a clearer picture of economic developments ahead of formal policy decisions.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over the duration of the Middle East conflict, which will determine the magnitude of the energy price shock and its impact on inflation - risk to energy and household budgets.
  • Potential for higher oil and gas costs to feed through to prices in the UK if the shock persists - risk to inflation-sensitive sectors such as consumer goods and services.
  • If the conflict endures, the resilience of the banking system could be tested despite no immediate concerns being reported - risk to financial stability and credit conditions.

More from Economy

Turkey Calls for Constructive Stance as U.S. and Iran Resume Peace Talks Apr 16, 2026 Fed succession faces mounting hurdles as Powell’s term nears May 15 deadline Apr 16, 2026 Volatile Markets Drive Trading Gains While Deal Activity Remains Uncertain Apr 16, 2026 Peruvian Markets Wobble as Castillo-Aligned Leftist Gains Traction in Tight Race Apr 16, 2026 German banks and regulators probe security implications of Anthropic’s Mythos model Apr 16, 2026