Stock Markets July 14, 2026 08:42 AM

HSBC Lowers Rating on IBM, Argues Peer Basket Delivers Better Earnings Prospects

Bank creates a 'synthetic IBM' from SAP, Accenture, HP and IonQ and finds higher 2030 EPS at similar cost

By Priya Menon
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
IBM SAP ACN HPQ IONQ

HSBC downgraded IBM from Hold to Reduce and cut its price target to $191 from $231. The bank said a constructed basket of SAP, Accenture, HP and IonQ - a 'synthetic IBM' - would cost roughly the same as IBM today but offer materially higher estimated 2030 earnings per share. HSBC also highlighted concerns about IBM's quantum order flow and reliance on cost cutting to drive growth.

HSBC Lowers Rating on IBM, Argues Peer Basket Delivers Better Earnings Prospects
IBM SAP ACN HPQ IONQ
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • HSBC downgraded IBM from Hold to Reduce and lowered its price target to $191 from $231.
  • A constructed 'synthetic IBM' made up of SAP, Accenture, HP and IonQ would cost $287.56 and is projected to yield $23.15 in 2030 EPS, versus IBM's $16.59 non-GAAP EPS - a 40% difference.
  • HSBC flagged concerns about IBM's quantum order intake and reliance on cost cutting for growth; IBM trades at 22.0 times its 2027 estimated non-GAAP P/E versus a sector median of 16.9 times.

HSBC has moved IBM into a Reduce rating from Hold and trimmed its price objective to $191 from $231, according to a research note issued on Tuesday. The bank contends that investors could achieve stronger earnings exposure by assembling a group of IBM peers rather than owning IBM shares directly.

Analyst Abhishek Shukla explained that HSBC built what it calls a "synthetic IBM" by combining shares of SAP, Accenture, HP and IonQ. That composite, the note says, would cost $287.56 in total - effectively matching IBM's current market price.

HSBC's projection for the synthetic portfolio shows estimated 2030 earnings per share of $23.15. By contrast, the bank's forecast for IBM's non-GAAP EPS in 2030 is $16.59, a gap HSBC quantifies as about a 40% difference, while asserting that the two approaches offer broadly similar subsector exposure.

The research note raises specific competitive and durability concerns for IBM. On quantum computing, HSBC points to IonQ as a faster mover, noting that IBM took in only $100 million of new quantum computing orders across the past five quarters compared with almost $600 million for IonQ, according to the bank's figures.

HSBC further questioned the sustainability of IBM's growth, saying it is comparatively more dependent on ongoing cost cutting than peers such as SAP and Accenture. The bank projects IBM's software non-GAAP EBIT will compound at a 10.6% annual rate through 2030 - roughly in line with SAP - but says that pace is reached with weaker revenue growth behind it.

Valuation also factored into HSBC's view. The note points out that IBM is trading at 22.0 times its 2027 estimated non-GAAP price-to-earnings ratio, above a sector median of 16.9 times, even though its expected earnings growth is slower. Based on the bank's revised outlook and valuation work, the new price target implies a potential downside of 33.6% from current levels.


Market context and immediate reaction

The note lists the components of the synthetic portfolio - SAP, Accenture, HP and IonQ - as the peer mix HSBC uses to replicate IBM's subsector exposures. The bank's analysis highlights the relative earnings potential of that mix versus an investment in IBM at today's prices, while also calling attention to execution and order-flow risks in IBM's quantum effort.

Shares mentioned in the note include IBM, ACN, HPQ, SAP and IONQ.

Risks

  • IBM's growth may be less durable if it continues to rely on cost cutting rather than stronger revenue growth - this affects software and enterprise IT markets.
  • IonQ's stronger recent quantum computing order intake relative to IBM raises execution and competitive risks within the quantum computing subsector.
  • IBM's valuation premium - trading at 22.0 times 2027 estimated non-GAAP P/E compared with a sector median of 16.9 times - creates downside risk if earnings do not meet expectations.

More from Stock Markets

ServiceNow Shares Fall After IBM’s Weak Preliminary Q2 Results Jul 14, 2026 Accenture Shares Slip as IBM Warning and Sector Valuation Spotlight Weigh Jul 14, 2026 Macquarie’s Quant Model Highlights Singapore SMID-Cap Candidates Jul 14, 2026 Frontier to Fit SpaceX Starlink on Fleet, Debut Service in Early 2027 Jul 14, 2026 RBI Proposes Streamlined Approval for Institutional Bank Stakes Jul 14, 2026