World September 3, 2026 03:35 PM

Federal Grand Jury Indicts ICE Agent on False-Statement Charges in Minnesota Shooting

Christian Castro faces six federal counts as state and civil investigations continue over January shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis

By Avery Klein
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Christian Castro with six counts of making false statements related to the January shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in Minnesota. The indictment, disclosed by a source familiar with the matter, marks a rare Justice Department move against a federal immigration officer and comes amid parallel state charges, a suspended DHS employment status, and an ongoing civil rights review.

Federal Grand Jury Indicts ICE Agent on False-Statement Charges in Minnesota Shooting
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A federal grand jury has indicted ICE agent Christian Castro on six counts of making false statements related to the January 14 shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in Minnesota.
  • Castro faces separate state charges for the shooting and allegedly falsely reporting a crime after claiming he was attacked with a snow shovel and broom; video evidence reportedly contradicted his account.
  • DHS has suspended Castro and a civil rights investigation is ongoing; the case involves parallel state and federal actions and raises legal and procedural questions for immigration enforcement and government accountability.

A federal grand jury has indicted an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent on six counts of making false statements about a shooting that occurred in Minnesota during last winter's deportation surge, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the probe publicly.

The agent, identified as Christian Castro, was charged with lying to investigators, the person said. The indictment will be unsealed once Castro is taken into federal custody, the same source added.

The decision to pursue federal charges represents an unusual step from the Justice Department, which has generally refrained from asserting criminal allegations against federal officers, the person said. This action is the first known Justice Department prosecution of a federal immigration officer tied to the Minneapolis operation that formed part of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Castro also faces state-level criminal charges in Minnesota for an incident on January 14 in which he allegedly shot and wounded Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in the leg. That event occurred at the height of the administration’s deportation campaign in Minnesota, which prompted weeks of public protest.

There is an active Minnesota arrest warrant for Castro. He spent 90 days in a Texas county jail and was released last week after Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, said he would not sign extradition papers forwarded by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat.

Minnesota's state charges include an allegation that Castro falsely reported a crime after telling his superiors at the Department of Homeland Security that Sosa-Celis and others had attacked him with a snow shovel and a broom. Video evidence later undermined that account, the person said.

The Department of Homeland Security has suspended Castro, and a civil rights investigation is underway. The person familiar with the case said no final determination has been reached in that civil rights inquiry.

Separately, a federal prosecutor who had been working on the matter, Matt Evans, was fired this week after a report said he had emailed Sosa-Celis’ lawyers asserting that Department of Justice attorneys had blocked his efforts to pursue federal charges. The firing followed reporting that Evans told defense attorneys DOJ had halted his work to bring federal charges, according to the person familiar with the probe. Evans is now under investigation for obstruction of a grand jury investigation, the person added.

Since his release from the Cameron County jail last week, Castro has not publicly addressed the state charges against him and could not be reached for comment at the time of this report, the person said.

The Trump administration has largely defended the actions of ICE agents and has made proclamations that they possess absolute immunity from state prosecutions, a claim the article says is incorrect.

Robin Wolpert, a lawyer representing Sosa-Celis, issued a statement calling for stronger civil rights charges and full accountability. "Mr. Castro has been indicted for making false statements," she said. "But he made them to cover up the fact that he shot my client through the door of an occupied house without a self-defense justification."

The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota announced on Thursday it will represent Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis as he files a lawsuit against the Trump administration.


Context and ongoing developments

The federal indictment adds a new layer to a case that already has active state proceedings and a suspended federal employment status. It also coincides with personnel and procedural questions within the Justice Department, as illustrated by the firing of a prosecutor connected to the matter and the subsequent inquiry into potential obstruction of a grand jury probe.

At present, officials have said the federal charges will be unsealed once Castro is in custody, the civil rights review remains open, and the state arrest warrant stands. Those conditions together mean the case will continue to evolve on multiple legal tracks.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty - Multiple overlapping legal processes are active: a federal indictment pending unsealing when Castro is in custody, ongoing state charges, and a civil rights investigation. This creates procedural unpredictability for both enforcement agencies and legal teams. (Impacted sectors: legal services, government).
  • Institutional and reputational risk - The rare federal prosecution of a federal immigration officer and the firing and investigation of a prosecutor involved in the matter may increase scrutiny of enforcement operations and departmental processes. (Impacted sectors: government, legal services).
  • Political and interstate friction - The refusal by one state governor to sign extradition papers contributed to Castro's release and underscores potential tensions between state governments that could complicate interstate law enforcement cooperation. (Impacted sectors: government, legal services).

More from World

S&P Upholds UAE AA/A-1+ Ratings, Citing Large Fiscal and Liquidity Buffers Amid Regional Tensions Sep 4, 2026 Judge William Sullivan Draws Scrutiny as High-Profile Murder Trial of Lindsay Clancy Ends in Mistrial Sep 4, 2026 U.S. and China Set to Hold Mid-September Talks Focused Solely on AI Safety Sep 4, 2026 Influencer Influx at U.S. Open Raises Questions About Courtside Decorum Sep 4, 2026 U.S. Forces Report Use of High-Energy Laser to Bring Down 11 Cartel-Linked Drones Sep 4, 2026