World May 6, 2026 08:55 PM

Appeals Board Restarts Deportation Case Against Columbia Student Mahdawi

Federal appeals panel overturns immigration judge's ruling as legal and campus tensions persist over pro-Palestinian activism

By Jordan Park

The U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals has reinstated deportation proceedings against Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University student who has been at the center of controversy over pro-Palestinian protests. The board reversed a February decision by an immigration judge who had blocked the Trump administration's deportation effort. Mahdawi's legal team and civil liberties advocates say challenges to his arrest and detention continue in federal court.

Appeals Board Restarts Deportation Case Against Columbia Student Mahdawi

Key Points

  • The Board of Immigration Appeals reinstated deportation proceedings by overturning a February ruling by immigration judge Nina Froes - impacting the immigration legal process and related legal services sector.
  • Mahdawi was arrested last year after pro-Palestinian protests and again in April 2025 when he sought a citizenship interview; he was detained for two weeks, released by a judge and never charged - developments that bear on civil liberties and due process discourse.
  • The administration's broader measures against pro-Palestinian protesters, including deportation efforts, potential university funding actions, and scrutiny of immigrants' online speech, raise concerns for higher education institutions and legal rights advocates.

The U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals has reopened deportation proceedings against Mohsen Mahdawi, according to a court filing submitted by his lawyers.

In February, a U.S. immigration judge denied the Trump administration's attempt to remove Mahdawi, a Columbia University student who drew scrutiny after taking part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. That judge, Nina Froes of Chelmsford, Massachusetts, who had barred the administration's effort to deport him, was dismissed last month. The Board of Immigration Appeals, which operates within the Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review, has now overturned Froes' decision and reinstated the proceedings.

Mahdawi, who was born and raised in a refugee camp in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has been a focal point in the broader debate over campus activism and U.S. immigration enforcement. His lawyers said in the court filing that the government is pursuing renewed deportation action following the appeals board ruling.

His case has drawn contrasting characterizations from the administration and its opponents. President Donald Trump and administration officials assert that activists such as Mahdawi are antisemitic, support extremism and pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy. By contrast, activists and some Jewish organizations argue that the government is conflating political criticism of Israel - including its assault on Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories - with antisemitism, and equating advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremist causes.

"The government continues to weaponize the immigration system to silence dissent," Mahdawi said in a statement distributed by his legal team on Wednesday.

There are multiple elements to Mahdawi's recent interactions with immigration authorities. The filing notes that he was arrested last year after participating in pro-Palestinian protests. He was detained again in April 2025 when he arrived for an interview related to his U.S. citizenship petition. Following that April detention, he spent two weeks in custody before a judge ordered his release; he was not charged with a crime. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented Mahdawi, has argued that the government cannot deport him at present because the circumstances of his arrest remain under challenge in federal court.

The administration has pursued a broader policy approach aimed at curbing pro-Palestinian campus activism. Measures referenced in the filing include attempts to deport foreign protesters, threats to withhold funding from universities where protests took place, and scrutiny of immigrants' online speech. Rights experts have raised concerns that these actions pose risks to free speech, due process and academic freedom.

Campus activism against Israel's war in Gaza emerged at U.S. colleges beginning in late 2023 and reached peak intensity in 2024. While overall protest activity has diminished since that peak, the filing notes that sporadic incidents continue. Recent episodes cited include a University of Michigan commencement moment in which a professor praised pro-Palestinian protesters and the university subsequently issued an apology, and Rutgers University's decision to withdraw an invitation to pro-Palestinian business leader Rami Elghandour for an upcoming graduation address.


Summary

The Board of Immigration Appeals has reinstated deportation proceedings against Mohsen Mahdawi by overturning an immigration judge's February ruling that had blocked the Trump administration's deportation effort. Mahdawi's arrest and detention have been the subject of ongoing legal challenges, and civil liberties groups say federal litigation over his arrest continues. The case sits against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny of pro-Palestinian campus activism and administrative measures aimed at protesters.

Risks

  • Ongoing legal uncertainty - The reinstatement of deportation proceedings creates continued litigation risk for Mahdawi and may increase demand for immigration legal services; it also leaves unresolved the status of his citizenship petition while federal court challenges proceed (affects legal and civil liberties sectors).
  • Potential chilling effect on campus discourse - Administrative actions targeting protesters and related university responses could further strain academic freedom and lead universities to alter event programming or public engagements (affects higher education and nonprofit sectors).
  • Due process concerns - Rights experts' worries about free speech and due process suggest a risk of broader legal and reputational consequences for institutions and agencies involved in enforcement actions (affects public institutions and legal advisory markets).

More from World

Wealthy Donors Shift Support to One Nation as Australia’s Populist Momentum Grows May 6, 2026 Renewed U.S.-China Trade Confrontation Ahead of Presidential Visit May 6, 2026 Justice Department Files Suit to Overturn Colorado’s 15-Round Magazine Ban May 6, 2026 Journalists Killed or Abducted in Mexico Nearly Double in 2025, Report Finds May 6, 2026 Cuban leaders condemn U.S. statements on possible military intervention amid crippling fuel shortages May 6, 2026