Stock Markets March 31, 2026 04:58 PM

ORIC Pharmaceuticals Shares Plunge After Company Pins Phase 3 Dose for Himalayas-1

Rinzimetostat set at 400 mg once daily with darolutamide; selection driven by dose-optimization data and exposure-related toxicity at higher dose

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
ORIC

ORIC Pharmaceuticals' stock dropped 27% after the company named 400 mg once daily as the recommended Phase 3 dose of rinzimetostat in combination with darolutamide for the Himalayas-1 registrational trial in post-abiraterone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The choice followed dose-optimization findings showing comparable efficacy between 400 mg and 600 mg but a statistically significant link between higher drug exposure and toxicities at 600 mg. The Himalayas-1 study is planned to begin in the first half of 2026 and will enroll roughly 600 patients worldwide.

ORIC Pharmaceuticals Shares Plunge After Company Pins Phase 3 Dose for Himalayas-1
ORIC
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • ORIC selected rinzimetostat 400 mg once daily as the recommended Phase 3 dose in combination with darolutamide for the Himalayas-1 registrational trial.
  • Selection was based on Phase 1b data showing comparable efficacy between 400 mg and 600 mg, while higher exposure at 600 mg was statistically associated with increased toxicities.
  • Himalayas-1 is planned to enroll about 600 patients across more than 250 sites in over 20 countries, randomized 1:1 versus physician's choice of an AR inhibitor or chemotherapy; primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival.

ORIC Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ORIC) saw its shares fall about 27% on Tuesday after announcing the recommended Phase 3 dosing for rinzimetostat in combination with darolutamide for its global Himalayas-1 registrational trial targeting post-abiraterone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The company selected rinzimetostat 400 mg once daily as the Phase 3 dose to be used alongside darolutamide. ORIC said the decision rested on Phase 1b dose optimization data showing that 400 mg and 600 mg delivered comparable efficacy measures, while exposure-response analyses identified statistically significant relationships between higher drug exposure and increased toxicities at the 600 mg dose.

At a median follow-up of approximately 5 months, the 400 mg cohort showed a landmark 5-month radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) of 84% among 18 efficacy-evaluable patients. ORIC stated that this rPFS result was consistent with that reported for a competitor PRC2 inhibitor now in Phase 3.

Additional efficacy signals at the 400 mg level included a prostate-specific antigen 50 (PSA50) response in 47% of patients, with 33% of those responses confirmed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements revealed that 71% of patients achieved greater than 50% reduction in ctDNA.

Safety findings at the recommended dose indicated that the vast majority of treatment-related adverse events were Grade 1 in severity. The most commonly observed adverse events were fatigue (39%), diarrhea (22%), and nausea (22%). There was one recorded Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event, and the company reported no Grade 4 or Grade 5 events attributed to the therapy. Dose modifications were infrequent, consisting of one treatment interruption and one discontinuation, and no dose reductions were required.

ORIC outlined the Himalayas-1 study design: approximately 600 patients will be enrolled across more than 250 sites in over 20 countries. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive rinzimetostat plus darolutamide versus physician's choice of an androgen receptor inhibitor or chemotherapy. The primary endpoint for the trial is radiographic progression-free survival, and initiation of the Phase 3 study is expected in the first half of 2026.

The market reaction to the dose selection was immediate, with the company's share price declining sharply following the announcement.

Risks

  • Exposure-response analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between higher drug exposure at 600 mg and increased toxicities, indicating potential safety limitations at the higher dose - impacts clinical development and regulatory review.
  • Reported efficacy metrics derive from a median follow-up of approximately 5 months and 18 efficacy-evaluable patients for the 400 mg dose, reflecting limited follow-up and a small evaluable cohort - impacts the robustness of early efficacy evidence.
  • The market reacted negatively to the dose-selection announcement, with a 27% stock decline, underlining investor sensitivity to clinical-development decisions and their effect on biotech equities.

More from Stock Markets

BMW’s Low Valuation Meets Lingering Cash-Flow Concerns Ahead of Capital Markets Day Sep 24, 2026 Citi Lifts MTU Aero Engines to Buy, Flags Cash-conversion Turning Point Sep 24, 2026 Jakarta stocks slide as financials, infrastructure and agriculture weigh on market Sep 24, 2026 Stellantis Shares Hit 52-Week Low After Market-Share Dip and Analyst Pressure Sep 24, 2026 AI models flag tech infrastructure winners as strategy posts +212% since launch Sep 24, 2026