Commodities July 28, 2026 06:55 PM

U.S. Oil Trade Group Rejects Strait of Hormuz Tolls Amid Gulf-Backed Voluntary Fee Plan

American Petroleum Institute leader says any new tolling authority - especially tied to military force - would be unacceptable as markets seek a return to normalcy

By Caleb Monroe
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

The American Petroleum Institute (API) has publicly opposed establishing tolls or transit fees for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, after a Gulf-backed proposal reportedly offered Iran the option to collect voluntary fees. API CEO Mike Sommers warned against endorsing a new tolling authority, particularly one linked to the threat of further military action. He also urged U.S. lawmakers to bolster the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and consider new West Coast storage sites to help stabilize markets.

U.S. Oil Trade Group Rejects Strait of Hormuz Tolls Amid Gulf-Backed Voluntary Fee Plan
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • The American Petroleum Institute opposes establishing tolls or transit fees for vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Oman reportedly offered Iran a Gulf-backed plan that would allow Tehran to collect voluntary fees from ships using the waterway.
  • API CEO Mike Sommers called for U.S. investment in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and consideration of new West Coast SPR sites to improve market resilience.

The American Petroleum Institute has taken a firm stance against creating tolls or transit fees for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, API Chief Executive Mike Sommers said in an interview on Tuesday. The comments come after reports that Oman submitted a plan, supported by Gulf states, that would allow Iran to collect voluntary fees from vessels using the waterway.

Sommers cautioned that the trade group is unlikely to back "any kind of new tolling authority, particularly one that’s backed up by the threat of more bombing in the Strait of Hormuz," reflecting concerns about linking maritime charges to coercive force or military escalation.

The report of the Gulf-backed proposal specifies that Tehran would be permitted to collect voluntary payments from ships transiting the strait. That proposal has drawn attention because Iran has exerted strong control over the Strait of Hormuz since the United States and Israel began bombing the country in February, a dynamic that has contributed to sharp upward pressure on oil prices.


Market implications and transit security

Sommers said restoring normal levels of vessel traffic through the strait is essential for returning global oil markets to more typical conditions. However, he emphasized that Iran should not be allowed to exercise de facto control over the waterway, indicating concern that arrangements which grant Tehran influence over transit decisions or revenue could hinder market stability.

The API chief noted that the U.S. and other major oil-consuming nations have been withdrawing crude and fuel from inventories at record rates, a factor that has accompanied recent price volatility. That drawdown in supplies has heightened sensitivity to disruptions in key chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.


Strategic Petroleum Reserve recommendations

Beyond maritime policy, Sommers urged Congress to consider targeted investments in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve. He highlighted that SPR caverns are designed for rapid drawdowns but can be difficult to refill and to maintain, suggesting a structural limitation that could affect preparedness for prolonged supply shocks.

As one possible response, Sommers recommended Congress look at opening additional SPR sites on the U.S. West Coast. He said this was an option that President Donald Trump’s administration had considered prior to the start of the Iran war, framing it as an available policy lever to improve domestic resilience.


Context and next steps

The API’s public opposition to tolling authority for the Strait of Hormuz underscores industry resistance to measures that could institutionalize payments to a party exercising leverage over a critical shipping lane. At the same time, the group is pressing U.S. policymakers to strengthen reserve capacity to buffer markets while maritime security and transit arrangements remain contested.

Risks

  • Iran’s continued control or influence over the Strait of Hormuz could sustain elevated oil price volatility - impacting oil markets, shipping, and broader energy sectors.
  • Linking transit charges to the threat of military force raises the risk of further escalation in the Gulf, with potential consequences for maritime safety and global crude flows.
  • Structural limitations in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve - including difficulty refilling and maintaining SPR caverns - could reduce its effectiveness during prolonged supply disruptions, affecting energy security and downstream fuel markets.

More from Commodities

Oil prices jump over 4% as Iran missile strikes and inventory draw lift market sentiment Jul 28, 2026 China Engages Houthi Movement to Secure Safe Passage for Its Tankers Through Southern Red Sea Jul 28, 2026 Corn Futures Climb After USDA Lowers Crop Condition Rating Jul 28, 2026 Gold Hovers Around $4,000 as Fed Rate Risk Battles Central Bank Buying Jul 28, 2026 European wholesale gas slides to one-week lows as oil falls and US-Iran talks cool geopolitical premium Jul 28, 2026