Stock Markets July 13, 2026 11:00 AM

Appeals Court Restores Over 500 Lawsuits Claiming Prenatal Tylenol Use Linked to Autism and ADHD

2nd U.S. Circuit finds district judge improperly excluded plaintiffs' expert testimony; Kenvue and its pending acquisition by Kimberly-Clark face renewed legal uncertainty

By Ajmal Hussain
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
KMB JNJ KVUE

A federal appeals court has revived more than 500 private lawsuits that claim Tylenol use during pregnancy is connected to autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a Manhattan district judge wrongly barred expert testimony from parents and guardians. The suits had been dismissed in December 2024 and the issue has attracted heightened attention following public comments by leading U.S. figures. Kenvue, the maker of Tylenol, maintains the product is safe.

Appeals Court Restores Over 500 Lawsuits Claiming Prenatal Tylenol Use Linked to Autism and ADHD
KMB JNJ KVUE
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A federal appeals court revived more than 500 private lawsuits against Kenvue alleging a link between prenatal Tylenol use and autism or ADHD.
  • The 2nd U.S. Circuit found that a Manhattan district judge wrongly excluded plaintiffs' expert testimony; earlier dismissal criticized experts' methodology.
  • The development affects the consumer healthcare sector and intersects with Kenvue's pending $40+ billion acquisition by Kimberly-Clark.

A federal appeals panel on Monday revived in excess of 500 private lawsuits brought against Kenvue, the manufacturer of Tylenol, in which parents and guardians allege that maternal use of the pain reliever during pregnancy is linked to autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan concluded that a lower court judge had improperly excluded testimony from expert witnesses presented by the plaintiffs. Those experts sought to connect prenatal acetaminophen exposure to later diagnoses of autism and ADHD, but their testimony was rejected at the district court level.

The appeals court’s decision comes against the backdrop of scientific uncertainty: the record does not establish a firm scientific consensus that such a link exists. Nonetheless, the legal proceedings have attracted broader public attention after comments last September from President Donald Trump and senior U.S. health officials suggesting a possible connection between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism.

When asked for comment following the ruling, Kenvue did not immediately respond. Market trading reflected a modest move in the company’s shares, which were down 10 cents to $19.38 in morning trading on the day of the decision.

The litigation timeline includes a December 2024 dismissal by U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan, who criticized the methodology used by the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. Among those experts named in the proceedings was Andrea Baccarelli, dean of the Harvard School of Public Health.

Monday’s ruling arrives after Kenvue reached an agreement in November to be acquired by Kimberly-Clark in a transaction valued at more than $40 billion. That corporate backdrop places the revived suits in the context of a pending major acquisition.

Medical authorities and professional societies have routinely regarded acetaminophen - the active ingredient in Tylenol - as the preferred treatment for pain and fever during pregnancy. Kenvue, which is headquartered in Summit, New Jersey, has consistently maintained that Tylenol is safe. The company was spun off from Johnson & Johnson in 2023; J&J had manufactured Tylenol for over six decades and has also defended its safety profile.

The appeals court ruling reintroduces legal uncertainty for Kenvue and raises questions about how expert testimony will be evaluated as the cases proceed. The decision returns the question of admissible scientific evidence to the lower courts to address as the litigation continues.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty for Kenvue as the revived suits proceed could affect the consumer healthcare sector and related market valuations.
  • The timing of the rulings introduces potential complications for Kimberly-Clark's planned acquisition of Kenvue, creating acquisition risk for the industrials and consumer goods sectors.
  • Public debate and high-profile commentary about the alleged link could influence perceptions of acetaminophen safety despite the absence of firm scientific consensus, impacting medical guidance and consumer behavior in healthcare markets.

More from Stock Markets

State AGs Move to Block $110 Billion Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Deal Jul 13, 2026 Deckers Shares Edge Higher After Jefferies Upgrade and Raised Price Target Jul 13, 2026 TransDigm Shares Drop After Withdrawal From Stellant Acquisition Jul 13, 2026 Eos Energy Shares Plunge to Year Low as Rights Offering Sparks Dilution Concerns Jul 13, 2026 Shein Moves Toward Hong Kong Listing, Eyes $2-3 Billion IPO as Soon as August Jul 13, 2026