Stock Markets June 29, 2026 07:26 PM

ACCC Takes Amazon to Court Over Prime Video Advertising and Contract Terms

Australian regulator alleges unfair clauses allowed Amazon to add ads to Prime Video and force subscribers to pay to keep ad-free access

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
AMZN

Australia's competition regulator has launched legal proceedings against Amazon, alleging the company inserted unfair contract terms into Prime subscriptions and relied on those terms to introduce advertising to Prime Video. The ACCC says subscribers who had paid A$79 upfront were later required to pay A$2.99 per month to avoid ads. Amazon Australia says it is reviewing the case and cooperated with the regulator's investigation.

ACCC Takes Amazon to Court Over Prime Video Advertising and Contract Terms
AMZN
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • The ACCC has filed court proceedings against Amazon alleging five unfair contract terms in Prime subscription contracts between November 2023 and August 2025.
  • The regulator says Amazon relied on those terms when it introduced ads to Prime Video in July 2024, and that subscribers who had paid A$79 upfront were later required to pay A$2.99 per month to avoid ads.
  • The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, consumer redress, costs and other orders; Amazon Australia says it is reviewing the case and cooperated with the investigation.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) announced on Tuesday that it has commenced court action against Amazon.com Inc over the Prime Video service, asserting the company breached consumer law by including unfair contract terms in its Prime subscription agreements and then invoking those terms to introduce advertising.


According to the ACCC, Amazon inserted five unfair contract terms into Prime subscription contracts during the period between November 2023 and August 2025. The regulator says those terms were relied upon when Amazon introduced advertisements to its Prime Video streaming offering in July 2024.

The ACCC highlighted the impact on subscribers, noting that people who had paid A$79 up front for Prime were later left with the only practical option of paying an additional A$2.99 per month to retain ad-free viewing. In a statement, ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said: "Consumers who wanted to avoid ads were left with no choice but to pay more to maintain the service they’d initially signed up for."


The regulator is seeking a range of remedies through the courts, including declarations, civil penalties, consumer redress, costs, and other orders. The ACCC did not provide specifics on the form or amount of any proposed restitution for affected consumers.

An Amazon Australia spokesperson said the company was reviewing the court proceedings and confirmed that Amazon had cooperated with the ACCC during its investigation.


This action by the ACCC centers on the intersection of subscription terms and advertising changes to a streaming service. The complaint identifies a precise timeline for the contested contract terms and for Amazon's decision to add ads. It also highlights the financial consequence asserted by the regulator: subscribers who had already paid for Prime were later asked to pay a recurring fee to avoid advertising.

At this stage, the case will proceed through the Australian courts, with remedies sought by the ACCC yet to be specified in detail.

Risks

  • The ACCC did not specify the nature or amount of the consumer redress and other remedies it seeks, leaving uncertainty about potential financial outcomes for Amazon and affected subscribers - impacts primarily on streaming and consumer protection sectors.
  • The legal proceedings could result in civil penalties or orders that change contractual practices for subscription services, though the final judicial outcome remains uncertain - affecting streaming platforms and digital subscription business models.
  • Subscribers who paid the upfront fee and later faced an additional monthly charge to avoid ads may or may not receive restitution, as the ACCC has not detailed proposed restitutions - creating uncertainty for consumer redress processes.

More from Stock Markets

U.S. Futures Hold After Tech-Led Rally as Iran Talks and Payrolls Data Loom Jun 29, 2026 Ares Acquisition Corporation III Prices $345 Million IPO for NYSE Listing Jun 29, 2026 U.S. Drives a Third of 2025 Global CO2 Uptick as Coal Use Rebounds Jun 29, 2026 Australian Competition Watchdog Takes Amazon Unit to Court Over Prime Video Ad Changes Jun 29, 2026 Ionic Digital Seeks Nasdaq Direct Listing After Acquiring Celsius Mining Assets Jun 29, 2026