Cryptocurrency July 1, 2026 09:00 AM

Audit Win Narrows Crypto Tax Exposure From $1.55M to About $148K After Blockchain Reconstruction

Forensic tracing of wallet flows and IRS representation persuaded examiners that disputed Poloniex withdrawals were owner transfers, not new income

By Derek Hwang
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A cryptocurrency taxpayer facing an IRS audit saw an estimated $1.55 million tax exposure trimmed to roughly $148,000 after Crypto Tax Made Easy reconstructed blockchain records and Securus Advisors provided IRS representation. The firms argued that contested withdrawals from Poloniex were transfers between wallets controlled by the taxpayer rather than taxable dispositions, a position accepted in settlement after incomplete exchange data initially suggested unreported income.

Audit Win Narrows Crypto Tax Exposure From $1.55M to About $148K After Blockchain Reconstruction
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A taxpayer reduced an estimated $1.55 million tax liability to a settlement of about $148,000 after reconstruction of blockchain and exchange records and IRS representation.
  • Incomplete exchange data from Poloniex and the exchange's cessation of U.S. trading hindered the taxpayer's ability to provide records, prompting the need for forensic tracing of wallet flows.
  • The firms demonstrated that disputed movements were transfers between wallets controlled by the taxpayer rather than new taxable income, supporting a settlement equal to roughly 9.5 percent of the original estimated exposure.

Draper, Utah/USA, July 1st, 2026 - A taxpayer under Internal Revenue Service scrutiny reduced an estimated tax exposure from roughly $1.55 million to a settlement around $148,000 after a combined effort by a crypto tax accounting firm and tax counsel.

Crypto Tax Made Easy rebuilt the client’s blockchain and exchange record history while Securus Advisors handled the taxpayer’s IRS representation. The central factual dispute concerned withdrawals reported in data the IRS obtained from the Poloniex exchange - transactions the IRS read as possible new income because the exchange data available to examiners did not show the full transaction context.

The IRS can compel exchange information through John Doe summonses, producing datasets that sometimes lack the comprehensive detail a taxpayer could supply from their own records. In this case, the IRS received data indicating transactions the taxpayer had not reported on a prior return. Because Poloniex had stopped supporting U.S. trading, the taxpayer could not retrieve full records from the exchange and initially could not demonstrate that disputed withdrawals were sourced from earlier deposits the taxpayer had made.

According to the taxpayer, the IRS asserted approximately $4.2 million in unreported income and capital gains, a base amount the taxpayer understood could translate to about $1.55 million in tax liability. The pattern at issue involved funds that had moved from a personal wallet into exchanges and later returned to a wallet under the taxpayer’s control. With only partial exchange data in the IRS files, the later withdrawals could be interpreted as fresh income rather than returns of previously deposited assets.

"The IRS has data, but the data does not always explain the full transaction history," said Matt Walrath, Founder of Crypto Tax Made Easy. "When a taxpayer cannot document wallet ownership, exchange deposits, withdrawals, and cost basis, a transfer can be misread as income."

Crypto Tax Made Easy reconstructed the chain of transactions from publicly available blockchain records to trace net flows between the taxpayer’s wallets and the exchange. Securus Advisors, represented in the matter by tax attorney Ephraim Olson and partner Michael Bergloff, presented this reconstructed evidence to IRS examiners. The firms demonstrated that the cryptocurrencies in question originated in a wallet owned by the taxpayer, were deposited into exchanges, and later flowed back to a wallet the taxpayer controlled.

That factual reconstruction underpinned the firms’ position that the disputed movements were predominantly transfers between accounts controlled by the same person rather than taxable dispositions generating new income. The case concluded with a settlement of approximately $148,000, an amount that the parties describe as about 9.5 percent of the client’s original estimated exposure. The taxpayer also reported having spent more than $80,000 on prior attorneys and accountants before engaging the firms that ultimately handled the audit resolution.

"Crypto tax defense depends on whether the records can be explained in a way an examiner can follow," said Michael Bergloff, Certified Public Accountant and Partner at Securus Advisors. "Raw exchange data may show funds moving out without showing that the same taxpayer moved funds in first."

Under U.S. tax rules, digital assets are treated as property. A transfer of assets between wallets or accounts under the same taxpayer’s control is generally not treated as a disposition and by itself does not create taxable income. Establishing that characterization can be challenging when exchange records are incomplete, restricted, or unavailable to U.S. users - circumstances highlighted by this audit.


About the firms and case outcomes

Crypto Tax Made Easy is a specialist cryptocurrency tax accounting firm composed of full-time crypto tax professionals. The firm reports having served more than 730 clients across the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Europe, reconciling in excess of 6.7 million transactions. Securus Advisors is described as a crypto-focused CPA firm that provides tax planning, advisory services, and IRS representation; it led the taxpayer’s representation before the IRS in this matter.

Contact listed: Matthew Walrath, Director, Crypto Tax Made Easy - [email protected]


Legal and outcome caveat

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each tax matter depends on its unique facts, the records available, the tax years and jurisdictions involved, and the positions taken by the taxpayer and the taxing authority.

Risks

  • Incomplete or restricted exchange records can lead to misclassification of transfers as taxable income, increasing audit exposure for taxpayers and affecting the tax compliance sector.
  • When a taxpayer cannot document wallet ownership, deposits, withdrawals, and cost basis, tax authorities may treat movements as dispositions - a risk for individuals and intermediaries dealing with digital asset transfers.
  • Legal and advisory costs can accumulate before effective representation is engaged; in this case, the taxpayer reported spending over $80,000 on prior attorneys and accountants, highlighting financial risk to taxpayers and professional services demand.

More from Cryptocurrency

Utorg Secures MiCA Authorization as EU Deadline Forces Industry Pullback Jul 1, 2026 Crypto Industry Surpasses Other Corporates as Top Political Donor Ahead of 2026 Midterms Jun 30, 2026 Bitcoin Remains Under $60,000, Poised for Second Straight Quarterly Decline Amid ETF Outflows Jun 29, 2026 Bitcoin Holds Above $60,000 as ETF Outflows and Fed Rate Outlook Pressure Sentiment Jun 28, 2026 Bitcoin Holds Above $60,000 as Scrutiny Grows Over Strategy’s Preferred-Funding Model Jun 27, 2026