Stock Markets April 17, 2026 04:46 PM

Fed Signals Banks Should Not Repeat Strong Pushback on Revised Capital Rules

Vice Chair for Supervision tells executives regulators expect focused, limited feedback as new Basel III and GSIB drafts move to formal comment period

By Nina Shah JPM
Fed Signals Banks Should Not Repeat Strong Pushback on Revised Capital Rules
JPM

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman has conveyed to large bank executives that the Fed does not anticipate a repeat of the forceful industry pushback that followed last year's capital proposals. The Fed released relaxed drafts of the Basel III and GSIB surcharge rules last month, which it estimates will lower capital levels at major U.S. banks by about 4.8% overall. Responses to the draft are due during a formal 90-day comment period, around mid-June.

Key Points

  • Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman told big bank executives she does not expect another aggressive industry pushback, according to three people.
  • The Fed's relaxed drafts of Basel III and the GSIB surcharge are estimated to reduce capital levels at large U.S. banks by about 4.8% in aggregate; the 2023 plan had proposed about 20% increases.
  • Responses to the drafts are due in a formal 90-day comment period around mid-June; officials asked that comments be limited and specific.

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman has told executives from large U.S. banks that she does not expect the industry to mount another vigorous campaign to seek additional capital relief, according to three people with knowledge of those communications.

Last month the Fed circulated softened versions of its proposed Basel III and global systemically important bank - GSIB - surcharge rules. The central bank estimated the revised drafts would reduce capital requirements at large U.S. banks by roughly 4.8% in aggregate, a marked retreat from the scale of increases outlined in the Fed's 2023 proposal, which had contemplated about 20% hikes.

The benefits of the revised drafts will not be uniform across firms. For example, JPMorgan said on Tuesday that under the new plan its capital level would actually rise by approximately 4% rather than fall. Other executives speaking during earnings this week indicated that the industry is likely to propose some targeted changes and expects to submit feedback during the formal 90-day comment period.

Bowman and other Fed officials have met with bank leaders in recent weeks to explain that regulators have taken steps to address complaints from the industry and to convey that they do not anticipate a reprise of the aggressive tactics that characterized the fight over the 2023 plan, the three people said.

Officials also advised that industry comments, which are due by around mid-June, should be concise and specific, two of the people added. A Fed spokesperson declined to comment.


Context and next steps

The revised drafts move into a formal comment period during which regulated firms and other stakeholders may submit detailed responses. Fed officials have signaled a preference for focused submissions aimed at pinpointing specific technical or operational issues rather than broad, expansive campaigns.

What is clear from the conversations so far

  • The Fed has relaxed the earlier 2023 proposals and estimates the net effect is a roughly 4.8% decline in capital levels for large U.S. banks overall.
  • Outcomes will vary by institution - JPMorgan projects a roughly 4% increase in its capital level under the new draft.
  • Regulators are urging limited and detailed comment submissions, with responses due around mid-June.

The dialogue between regulators and large banks will determine whether further technical adjustments follow before any final rulemaking. For now, Fed officials appear to be seeking a measured, narrow engagement from the industry rather than a repeat of last year's broader campaign.

Risks

  • Uneven distribution of capital impacts across banks creates uncertainty for balance sheet management and capital planning - affecting banking and financial services sectors.
  • Potential for industry submissions to seek further changes could prolong rule finalization and extend regulatory uncertainty for banks and markets.
  • If firms deploy a broad campaign rather than targeted, specific comments it could complicate the Fed's ability to finalize rules quickly and clearly.

More from Stock Markets

Mexican equities climb as Industrials and consumer sectors lead gains Apr 17, 2026 Colombian equities retreat as COLCAP drops 1.33% at Friday close Apr 17, 2026 MOEX Russia Index Ends Lower as Oil & Gas, Power and Mining Stocks Weigh Apr 17, 2026 Trump and IRS Lawyers Seek 90-Day Pause as Settlement Talks Progress in $10 Billion Leak Suit Apr 17, 2026 Spirit Airlines Seeks Emergency Federal Aid as Fuel Costs Rise and Restructuring Deepens Apr 17, 2026