Economy April 22, 2026 09:07 AM

Women’s Representation in Top Finance Roles Reaches Record but Progress Remains Limited, Study Finds

OMFIF index shows gains at central banks and North America despite political headwinds, while commercial banks lag behind

By Maya Rios
Women’s Representation in Top Finance Roles Reaches Record but Progress Remains Limited, Study Finds

A new OMFIF Gender Balance Index finds women hold a record 19% of top roles across major financial institutions, up from 16% a year earlier. The report highlights strong gains at central banks and in North America, but an overall index score of 44/100 and persistent promotion bottlenecks underline how far institutions remain from gender parity.

Key Points

  • Women now occupy 19% of top roles across central and commercial banks, sovereign and pension funds, up from 16% a year earlier (data from 335 institutions).
  • The overall Gender Balance Index score is 44 out of 100, indicating institutions are less than halfway to gender parity; North America’s score rose to 82 driven in part by the U.S. Federal Reserve where six regional bank heads are women.
  • Central banks showed the largest gains with 35 of 185 now led by women; commercial banks lag with only seven female CEOs out of 50 and pension fund heads slipping from 12 to 11.

The share of women occupying the most senior positions at major financial institutions has risen to a record level, according to the latest annual Gender Balance Index (GBI) produced by the London-based OMFIF think tank. Women now hold 19% of leading roles across central and commercial banks, sovereign and pension funds, up from 16% the previous year.

The report, which draws on data from 335 institutions, signals incremental progress but also underscores the distance remaining to true parity. On an overall scale where 100 would represent gender balance, the GBI score stands at 44, meaning institutions are less than halfway to equal representation at the top.

While the proportion of women in broader senior roles edged up only slightly to 33%, the study found that rising into the very top position remains unusually difficult. "Even with the rate of improvement seen in recent years, it would still take 22 years for the GBI score to reach an average of 100," the report’s author Andrea Correa said, adding that the timeframe could extend further.


Regional and institutional breakouts

North America showed a marked improvement in the index, with its score climbing to 82. The report framed that rise as particularly notable given political pressure in the United States aimed at limiting diversity, equity and inclusion programmes. "It was a little bit of a surprise," Correa said. "Institutions have had to be more careful with their public messages (about equality), but they are still committed to it."

Central banks delivered the clearest gains in female leadership: a record 35 of the 185 central banks included in the index are now led by women. The Federal Reserve was highlighted as a contributor to U.S. improvements, where six regional bank presidents are women.

Sovereign wealth funds also improved, recording their largest five-year uptick with the share of female CEOs rising to 18%.


Areas of persistent weakness

Commercial banks lagged behind other institution types. Among the 50 commercial banks surveyed, only seven have women serving as chief executive officers. Pension funds slipped slightly, with the number of female heads falling to 11 from 12 the prior year.

Pipeline issues remain acute. The overall share of women in executive C-suite roles remained unchanged at 20%, and nearly half of the commercial banks in the index still have no women in their C-suite.

The report introduced a "glass ceiling ratio" to quantify how representation narrows toward the very top. The index-wide glass ceiling ratio is 0.56, signifying that women occupy top roles at just over half the rate that would be expected from their presence in leadership more broadly. Commercial banks score lowest among institution types on this metric at 0.41, reflecting a combination of relatively higher representation in senior roles but much lower presence in the top job.

"There is still a ceiling for women," Correa said, noting that reaching the top often requires long working hours. "That is often difficult for women because of child care and their role in households," she said, describing the dynamic as a "persistent promotion bottleneck."


Implications and takeaways

The GBI shows measurable improvement in women’s representation at the highest levels of major financial institutions, with central banks and sovereign funds driving much of the advance. However, the index’s overall score and the new glass ceiling ratio illustrate that progress is uneven across institution types and that barriers remain in promotion paths toward chief executive roles.

No new projections beyond the report’s stated timelines are offered; the author cautions that, even at recent rates of change, two decades or more could be required to achieve full balance according to the index’s methodology.

The study’s detailed breakdowns by institution type and region provide a snapshot of where female leadership has strengthened and where structural obstacles persist.

Risks

  • Slow pace of change - At the current rate of improvement, the report’s author estimates it could take about 22 years or longer for the GBI to reach an average score of 100, implying prolonged underrepresentation in senior financial roles. Sectors affected: banking, central banking, asset management.
  • Promotion bottlenecks - The glass ceiling ratio (index-wide 0.56; commercial banks 0.41) and stagnant C-suite representation (20%) point to systemic barriers in promotion to top jobs, which could affect leadership succession and diversity-related decision-making in finance sectors. Sectors affected: commercial banking, pension funds, sovereign funds.
  • Policy and public messaging pressures - The report notes institutions in North America have had to temper public communications on equality amid political pushback against DEI initiatives, creating uncertainty about how public-policy environments may influence internal diversity efforts. Sectors affected: financial institutions, central banks.

More from Economy

Cipollone Says Short Delay to Digital Euro Vote Is Manageable Apr 22, 2026 Shares of Private Credit Vehicles Trade at Multi-Year Discounts as Scrutiny Grows Apr 22, 2026 Economists See Fed Holding Rates at Least Six More Months as Middle East Conflict Lifts Energy Prices Apr 22, 2026 Canadian equity futures rise as Trump extends Iran ceasefire amid Strait of Hormuz attacks Apr 22, 2026 Best Buy Elevates Insider Jason Bonfig to CEO as Company Seeks Growth Recovery Apr 22, 2026