Economy April 16, 2026 12:37 PM

Miran Signals Possible Further Scaling Back of Rate-Cut Path as Inflation Persists

Fed governor who has pushed for swift cuts says energy-driven risks and stickier inflation could reduce the number of reductions he supports

By Derek Hwang
Miran Signals Possible Further Scaling Back of Rate-Cut Path as Inflation Persists

Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran, long the most forceful advocate for rapid interest-rate reductions, said he may lower his expectation for the number of cuts after recent inflation trends proved more persistent and energy price shocks changed the risk profile. Speaking in Washington, Miran said he moved his prior outlook from six cuts by end-2026 to four at last month’s meeting and could trim that further to three, while still backing a cut at the Fed’s April 28-29 policy meeting amid concerns about a cooling labour market.

Key Points

  • Stephen Miran, the Fed governor most in favor of fast rate cuts, said he may reduce his projection for the number of cuts due to stickier inflation.
  • Miran moved his outlook last month from six cuts by end-2026 to four, and indicated he might narrow that further to three.
  • Energy-price developments related to the U.S.-Iran conflict have increased the risks of higher inflation and reshaped the distribution of policy risks; markets expect the policy rate to remain at 3.50%-3.75% until perhaps June 2027.

Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran - widely viewed as the system’s most aggressive proponent of quick, substantial interest-rate reductions - warned on Tuesday that he may again pare back his projection for how many cuts the central bank should implement, citing inflation that has not eased as rapidly as he had expected.

Speaking at an economic forum in Washington, Miran said U.S. inflation dynamics had grown "a little bit less favorable" even before the conflict between the U.S. and Iran put upward pressure on global oil prices. He said that, at last month’s policy meeting, he reduced his outlook from an ambitious six rate cuts by the end of 2026 to four.

With a key measure of U.S. price increases expected to be 3.2% as of March - above the Fed’s 2% objective - Miran said: "I might have three (rate cuts), I might have four, I haven’t made up my mind." He added that he still anticipates the Fed will reach its inflation target next year, though the Iran conflict has altered the balance of risks around that forecast.

"I think we’ll net out to being pretty close to target a year from now," Miran said, while noting he would support a rate cut at the U.S. central bank’s April 28-29 meeting because of concerns about a slowing job market. At the same time, he warned that recent energy developments "have changed the distribution of risks ... and they’ve increased the risks of higher inflation."

Miran’s remarks come from the Fed’s most dovish policymaker, and the official most closely aligned with President Donald Trump’s calls for sharply lower interest rates. They underline how the Middle East conflict has complicated a monetary policy outlook that had already been challenging for President Trump’s nominee for Fed chair, Kevin Warsh.

President Trump has expressed confidence that Warsh will move to cut rates, but Miran remains the only Fed official to explicitly support the immediate, large reductions the president has urged. Other policymakers have shown little appetite for those swift cuts.

Market participants have reacted cautiously. Contracts tied to the Fed’s policy rate currently imply the benchmark will stay in the present 3.50%-3.75% range until perhaps June 2027, reflecting investor skepticism that the central bank will swiftly lower rates to the degree some have forecast.


What are the best investment opportunities in 2026? The original article included promotional material about investment research tools. That content remains part of the record but does not alter the reporting on Fed commentary or market expectations.

Investors and market participants will be watching incoming inflation readings, labour-market indicators and energy-price developments closely. Miran’s willingness to adjust his own rate path underscores how sensitive monetary policy projections have become to new data and geopolitical shocks.

Risks

  • Higher energy prices linked to the U.S.-Iran conflict could push inflation above current expectations, affecting consumer prices and sectors sensitive to oil costs - notably transportation and energy-intensive industries.
  • Slower labour-market conditions raise the risk of weaker economic growth, which could weigh on demand-sensitive sectors such as consumer discretionary and parts of the industrial complex.
  • Market expectations that rates will remain elevated for longer create uncertainty for interest-rate-sensitive assets, including fixed-income securities and rate-dependent corporate financing.

More from Economy

House Overrides Administration Move, Votes to Prolong Haitians' Temporary Protections Apr 16, 2026 White House Prepares Protections to Let Federal Agencies Use Anthropic’s Mythos AI Apr 16, 2026 Villeroy: Central Bank Independence Essential for Effective Monetary Policy Apr 16, 2026 Judge Clarifies Injunction, Rejects Broad National Security Defense for White House Ballroom Work Apr 16, 2026 Paulson Urges Preparedness as Risk of Disrupted Treasury Demand Looms Apr 16, 2026