World July 23, 2026 03:33 AM

Israel Voices Alarm as U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Pact Stokes Fears of Regional Arms Race

Agreement allowing Saudi reactors and uranium enrichment draws sharp criticism from Israeli political and security figures

By Ajmal Hussain
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A recently announced U.S.-Saudi agreement permitting Saudi Arabia to build nuclear reactors with American technology and to enrich uranium has prompted strong concern in Israel about a possible Middle Eastern arms race. The pact, intended to support a civilian nuclear programme and still subject to Congressional approval, has drawn warnings from Israeli political leaders and nonproliferation groups that it could undermine regional stability and provide a pathway to weapons development.

Israel Voices Alarm as U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Pact Stokes Fears of Regional Arms Race
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A U.S.-Saudi agreement announced on Wednesday would let Saudi Arabia build reactors using American technology and enrich uranium, intended to support a civilian nuclear programme and requiring Congressional approval.
  • Prominent Israeli figures, including Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman, warned the deal could trigger a regional nuclear arms race and undermine Israel's security; Israel is widely believed to hold the region's only nuclear arsenal.
  • Discussions around a civil nuclear deal between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have been ongoing for years under both the Trump and Biden administrations, with nonproliferation groups previously flagging potential pathways to weapons development.

A U.S.-Saudi agreement announced on Wednesday that would allow Saudi Arabia to construct nuclear reactors using American technology and to enrich uranium has provoked sharp concern in Israel about the potential start of an arms race across the Middle East.

The arrangement is framed as enabling a Saudi civilian nuclear programme, but it still requires approval from the U.S. Congress before it can proceed. Israeli leaders and former officials have responded with alarm, arguing the deal could jeopardize Israel's long-term security.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel's defence and foreign ministers have not issued public statements on the agreement so far, leaving room for prominent critics to voice their objections.

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who is seeking to unseat Netanyahu in an October 27 election, called the emerging nuclear agreement "a serious strategic failure that endangers our security." He warned that "nuclear enrichment on Saudi soil could lead to a regional nuclear race and a dangerous loss of control."

Former defence minister Avigdor Lieberman expressed similarly strong views, stating that "the civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia will end in nuclear weapons and will lead to a crazy arms race throughout the entire Middle East." He added that Israel, widely believed to possess the region's only nuclear arsenal, must oppose the deal and actively lobby the U.S. Congress to block it.

Officials and commentators note that negotiations over a civil nuclear arrangement between Washington and Riyadh have been under consideration for several years, spanning both President Donald Trump's first administration and that of former President Joe Biden. Despite that prior engagement, no pact had been finalized until now, in part because nonproliferation groups have warned the arrangement could offer Saudi Arabia a route toward developing a nuclear weapon.

Many in Israel had hoped any civil nuclear cooperation with Saudi Arabia would be tied to a broader normalization process between the two countries, as envisioned by the Biden administration's plan. That linkage, they argue, would provide a framework for integrating any Saudi civilian nuclear capability into a wider, more stabilizing regional arrangement.

Echoing that perspective, Benny Gantz, a former defence chief, said: "There is no security official who would say that introducing civilian nuclear capability into Saudi Arabia without integrating the move as part of building a moderate regional alliance is a step that is good for Israel’s security."


The deal's supporters describe it as focused on peaceful energy development, while opponents in Israel point to potential long-term security consequences and the risk of a proliferation pathway. With Congressional approval still required and senior Israeli officials remaining silent, political debate and diplomatic lobbying appear likely to intensify.

Risks

  • Potential for a regional nuclear arms race if uranium enrichment occurs on Saudi soil - impacting defense and geopolitical stability in the Middle East.
  • The agreement could be viewed as compromising Israel’s long-term security, prompting intensified diplomatic campaigns and political friction - affecting defense procurement and regional alliances.
  • Nonproliferation concerns that the civil nuclear programme could offer Saudi Arabia a route to weapons development - raising uncertainty for energy and defense markets tied to regional security dynamics.

More from World

ICC Ends Proceedings After Prosecutors Withdraw Charges Against Darfur Militia Leader Jul 23, 2026 U.S.-backed Outdoor Trials Begin for Male-Only GMO Screwworm Fly to Combat Livestock Pest Jul 23, 2026 Inside Pickaxe Mountain: The Deeply Buried Iranian Facility Drawn into U.S. Threats Jul 23, 2026 Galicia revives native sheep and Cachena cows to reduce wildfire risk Jul 23, 2026 Seoul Shifts to 'Peace First' Stance on North Korea While Keeping Denuclearisation as Long-Term Goal Jul 23, 2026