World February 6, 2026

U.S. Seeks Deportation of 5-Year-Old Held in Minnesota, Officials Say

Department of Homeland Security says removal proceedings are routine amid disputes over expedited deportation claims

By Hana Yamamoto
U.S. Seeks Deportation of 5-Year-Old Held in Minnesota, Officials Say

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has confirmed it is pursuing the deportation of a 5-year-old Ecuadorean boy who was detained last month in Minnesota. The department denied that it was seeking expedited removal after the child’s lawyer described the action as extraordinary and potentially retaliatory. The boy and his father had been released from detention in Texas and returned to Minnesota; the case has drawn national attention and sparked protests tied to broader immigration enforcement actions in the state.

Key Points

  • DHS confirmed it is pursuing deportation proceedings for a 5-year-old Ecuadorean boy detained in Minnesota.
  • The child's lawyer said the administration sought expedited deportation and described the move as "extraordinary" and possibly "retaliatory," while DHS called the proceedings "regular" and "standard procedure."
  • The child and his father entered the U.S. as asylum applicants, were detained in Dilley, Texas, released by a judge on January 31, and returned to Minnesota; the father's immigration status was later described by DHS as illegal without further detail.

The Department of Homeland Security said on Friday it is seeking to remove a 5-year-old Ecuadorean boy who was detained in Minnesota last month, confirming that formal removal proceedings are underway.

The department pushed back on a claim that the child was being put through an expedited deportation process after the boy's lawyer, Danielle Molliver, told the New York Times that the Trump administration was pursuing such a route. Molliver characterized the action as "extraordinary" and suggested it might be "retaliatory."

A department spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, responded to those remarks by saying, "These are regular removal proceedings," and adding, "This is standard procedure and there is nothing retaliatory about enforcing the nation’s immigration laws."

Attempts to obtain comment from lawyers representing the child, identified as Liam Conejo Ramos, and from the Department of Justice did not immediately elicit responses.

Liam and his father, Adrian Conejo Arias, entered the United States as asylum applicants and were detained at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Dilley, Texas. A judge ordered their release on January 31, and they subsequently returned to Minnesota.

The Department of Homeland Security has accused Conejo Arias of being in the United States illegally, but provided no further details in its statement regarding that claim.

The case drew wide attention after photographs circulated showing the child wearing a blue bunny hat and a Spider-Man backpack outside his home while federal agents took him into custody. The images contributed to national coverage and public interest in the matter.

The government action comes amid broader federal activity in Minnesota. President Donald Trump and senior administration officials have said in recent weeks they sought to reduce tensions in the state after the deployment of thousands of immigration agents as part of a crackdown. That deployment has prompted protests across Minnesota, where demonstrators have opposed the presence of immigration agents. The article noted that agents have fatally shot two U.S. citizens in the state, and those incidents have factored into public unrest.

The Department of Homeland Security described its process in this case as routine removal proceedings, while the child’s counsel framed the move as out of the ordinary. At the time of reporting, neither counsel for the child nor the Department of Justice had provided additional comment.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty - The outcome of the removal proceedings remains unclear and could change with additional legal filings or judicial decisions, affecting the child and family directly and potentially prompting further legal challenges - sector: legal services and immigration law.
  • Public reaction and unrest - The case has contributed to protests in Minnesota related to federal immigration enforcement, which could sustain political and social tensions in the state - sector: local public services and community safety.
  • Reputational and operational risk for enforcement agencies - High-profile cases and circulating images may intensify scrutiny of federal immigration operations and influence public sentiment toward agencies involved - sector: government operations and public affairs.

More from World

Law Firms Prepare for Wave of Refund Suits After Supreme Court Restriction on Tariff Power Feb 20, 2026 Appeals Court Clears Way for Louisiana Ten Commandments Classroom Requirement Feb 20, 2026 Fitch Keeps UK at AA- Citing Flexible Economy but Flags High Debt and Policy Uncertainty Feb 20, 2026 Fitch Maintains Congo's CCC+ Rating, Flags Persistent Debt and Governance Weaknesses Feb 20, 2026 Moody's Upholds Sweden's Aaa Rating, Cites Strong Fiscal Fundamentals Feb 20, 2026