World February 26, 2026

UN: Taliban Decree Widens Scope for Executions and Institutionalizes Harsh Punishments

Human Rights Chief warns new rules expand death-penalty offences, legitimise corporal punishment and criminalise dissent amid cross-border violence

By Maya Rios
UN: Taliban Decree Widens Scope for Executions and Institutionalizes Harsh Punishments

The United Nations human rights chief warned that a recent decree from Afghanistan’s Taliban leadership will significantly broaden the range of offences punishable by death, formalise corporal punishment including within homes, and criminalize criticism of the de facto authorities. The measures, expected to take effect soon, were described as contravening Afghanistan’s international legal obligations and further eroding freedoms—particularly for women and girls. Separately, the rights chief expressed alarm at rising civilian casualties in cross-border clashes with Pakistani forces, underscoring the urgency of political dialogue to prevent escalation.

Key Points

  • UN human rights chief says a Taliban decree signed last month expands offences eligible for the death penalty and prescribes corporal punishment, including within the home, which legitimises violence against women and children.
  • The decree criminalises criticism of the de facto leadership and its policies, in breach of freedoms of expression and assembly; detailed provisions have not been officially published by Taliban judicial bodies.
  • Rising civilian casualties in cross-border strikes, including the reported killing of 13 civilians in Pakistani airstrikes inside Afghanistan, increase concerns about regional security and the need for urgent political dialogue.

GENEVA, Feb 26 - A decree issued by Afghanistan’s de facto rulers threatens to further restrict rights and freedoms across the country, with particular consequences for women and girls, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said on Thursday.

Volker Turk told delegates at a Human Rights Council session that a recent directive signed last month by Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban supreme leader, ‘‘defines several crimes and punishments that contravene Afghanistan’s international legal obligations.’’ He said the order prescribes corporal punishment for a range of offences, including within the domestic setting, and thereby legitimises violence against women and children.

According to Turk, the decree broadens the list of acts that can attract the death penalty. It also makes it an offence to criticize the de facto leadership and its policies, measures he said are in direct violation of freedoms of expression and assembly. Detailed provisions of the text have not been released by the Taliban’s Ministry of Justice or Supreme Court, and the full wording of the decree was not available to outside observers at the time of Turk’s remarks.

The Afghan administration did not provide an immediate response to requests for comment on the decree. Turk urged the authorities to repeal the order, to introduce a moratorium on executions and to end the use of corporal punishment. He framed the situation facing women and girls as persecution within a system he characterised as analogous to gender apartheid.

Representatives of the Taliban have previously described women’s rights as matters for internal handling and have said such issues should be resolved locally. Turk’s assessment underscored a widening gap between such official assertions and the concerns voiced by the United Nations human rights office.

In addition to the decree, Turk highlighted a recent escalation in cross-border violence, noting the killing of 13 civilians in Pakistani airstrikes as an example of rising civilian harm. He said this trend of increasing casualties in clashes involving Pakistani military forces is deeply worrying and underlined the need for immediate political engagement to prevent further escalation.

Pakistan has said it carried out airstrikes inside Afghanistan to target what it described as militant safe havens, an allegation denied by Kabul. The Taliban authorities condemned the strikes as breaches of Afghanistan’s sovereignty and signalled they would respond at what they called an appropriate time. Turk’s intervention at the Geneva meeting linked the human rights concerns stemming from the decree with the broader regional security tensions arising from cross-border military actions.


Reporting note: Additional reporting and writing contributions were made by Mohammad Yunus Yawar. The article was edited by Ariba Shahid and Philippa Fletcher.

Risks

  • Worsening human rights conditions and expansion of capital and corporal punishments could further restrict civil liberties, affecting sectors that rely on civic space such as humanitarian and development organisations.
  • Criminalisation of dissent and limits on freedom of expression and assembly may impede the operation of independent media and non-governmental actors, creating operational and reputational risks for international aid and civil-society engagement.
  • Escalation of cross-border military actions and rising civilian casualties raise the risk of broader regional tensions, which could negatively affect cross-border trade, investment sentiment and security-related expenditures.

More from World

Russian Authorities Plan Early April Block on Telegram, Sources Say Feb 26, 2026 Denmark to Vote on March 24 as PM Leans on Greenland Standoff to Strengthen Support Feb 26, 2026 U.S. Treasury Seeks to Cut Swiss Bank MBaer from U.S. Financial System Over Alleged Ties to Iran and Russia Feb 26, 2026 Ecuador Lifts Tariffs on Colombian Imports to 50% Amid Border Security Dispute Feb 26, 2026 Cindy McCain to Step Down as Head of UN World Food Programme Feb 26, 2026