World March 7, 2026

Saudi Arabia Warns Iran to Halt Strikes, Says Continued Attacks Could Trigger Retaliation

Riyadh signals willingness to pursue diplomacy but cautions it may allow U.S. forces to operate from its bases if Iranian strikes on Saudi territory or energy infrastructure persist

By Priya Menon
Saudi Arabia Warns Iran to Halt Strikes, Says Continued Attacks Could Trigger Retaliation

Saudi officials have communicated directly to Tehran that Riyadh prefers a negotiated end to Iran’s confrontation with the United States but will consider reciprocal measures if attacks on the kingdom or its critical energy facilities continue. The warning preceded an apology by Iran’s interim president to Gulf neighbours and follows a week of drone and missile strikes across Gulf states.

Key Points

  • Saudi Arabia told Iran it prefers diplomatic de-escalation but warned that continued attacks on Saudi territory or energy infrastructure could force Riyadh to permit U.S. forces to use Saudi bases and that Riyadh would retaliate if strikes persist - impacts energy and defense sectors.
  • Saudi and Iranian foreign ministers communicated directly; Riyadh said it is open to mediation and has remained in regular contact with Tehran through its ambassador since the U.S. and Israeli military campaign began on February 28 - impacts diplomacy and regional security dynamics.
  • Iran’s acting president apologized to neighbouring Gulf states and announced a temporary council decision to suspend attacks on nearby countries unless they attack Iran; however, Iran’s military command maintained that U.S. and Israeli bases across the region remain targets - impacts political cohesion and military posture.

Saudi Arabia has informed Iran that while it is in favour of a diplomatic resolution to the current hostilities between Tehran and the United States, persistent attacks on Saudi territory and the kingdom’s energy sector could compel Riyadh to respond in kind, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

The warning was delivered in advance of a public address by Iran’s acting president, Masoud Pezeshkian, in which he offered an apology to neighbouring Gulf states for Iran’s actions - a remark that appeared intended to calm regional tensions after strikes that hit civilian targets. Sources said the Saudi position was conveyed in conversations between senior diplomats two days before that speech.

In the exchanges, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan spoke by phone with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and set out Riyadh’s stance clearly, the sources told the journalists. Prince Faisal, as cited by the sources, made it plain that Saudi Arabia was open to any form of mediation designed to de-escalate the situation and to reach a negotiated settlement.

At the same time, the Saudi foreign minister underscored a hard boundary: if Iranian assaults on Saudi soil or on the kingdom’s energy infrastructure continued, Saudi Arabia would be forced to allow U.S. forces to use Saudi bases for military operations. The sources quoted Prince Faisal as saying that Riyadh would retaliate if strikes on critical energy facilities persisted.

The sources said Saudi Arabia has maintained regular diplomatic contact with Tehran through its ambassador since the U.S. and Israeli military campaign against Iran began on February 28, which followed the collapse of talks over Iran’s nuclear programme. Saudi and Iranian foreign ministries did not respond to requests for comment.


Context of the strikes

Over the past week, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have all come under heavy drone and missile fire from Iran, according to the sources. The violence escalated rapidly after Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed on the first day of the war.

Tehran’s response included strikes directed at Israel and Gulf Arab states that host U.S. military installations. Israel in turn has attacked Lebanon’s Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah. The sequence of attacks and counterattacks has drawn Gulf states into direct exposure to the fighting.

Araqchi, in comments reported by the sources, said he remained in constant contact with his Saudi counterpart and other Saudi officials. He added that Riyadh had given assurances to Tehran that it would not permit its territory, waters or airspace to be used to launch attacks against Iran.


Iran’s temporary leadership and internal signals

Pezeshkian said Iran’s temporary leadership council had approved suspending attacks on nearby countries, except in cases where an attack on Iran came from those states. He stated, "I personally apologise to neighbouring countries that were affected by Iran’s actions." The degree to which those remarks represent a durable policy shift remained unclear, as further reports of strikes on Gulf states occurred after the speech.

Separately, the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters - the unified combatant command of the Iranian armed forces - issued a statement after the presidential remarks indicating that U.S. and Israeli bases and interests across the region would remain targets. The command said Iran’s armed forces respected the sovereignty and interests of neighbouring states and had not taken action against them so far, while also warning that U.S. and Israeli military bases and assets on land, at sea and in the air across the region would be treated as primary targets and could face "powerful and heavy" strikes by Iran’s forces.

The differing tones between the presidential apology and the combatant command’s statement suggest potential divisions or differing emphases among Iran’s leadership and military structures about how to conduct the operations and target selection.


Diplomatic exchanges and Tehran’s position

Two Iranian sources confirmed that a call took place in which Riyadh warned Tehran to stop attacks on Saudi Arabia and neighbouring Gulf states. Iran, those sources said, reiterated its stated position that the strikes were not aimed at Gulf countries themselves but at U.S. interests and military bases hosted on their territory.

One Iranian source said Tehran had demanded that U.S. bases in the region be closed and that some Gulf countries stop sharing intelligence with Washington that Iran believes is being used to launch attacks against it. Another Iranian source said certain military commanders were urging continuation of the strikes, accusing the United States of using Gulf bases and airspace to conduct operations against Iran.

The exchanges occurred against a backdrop of recent efforts by Iran to repair relations with Gulf neighbours, including a diplomatic rapprochement with Saudi Arabia in past years. Those diplomatic channels were disrupted by the recent barrage of drones and missiles reportedly launched by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the past week.


Implications and outstanding questions

Saudi Arabia’s position, as described by the sources, combines a stated openness to mediation with a clear warning: continued attacks on the kingdom or its vital energy infrastructure could change Riyadh’s calculation about allowing third-party military use of its territory. The Saudi message therefore links diplomatic engagement to a conditional deterrent strategy intended to protect national territory and critical assets.

At the same time, Iran’s public apology from its acting president, together with the combatant command’s continued targeting posture, leaves uncertainty about how uniformly Iran’s various institutions will adhere to any suspension of strikes on neighbouring states.

Both sides, according to the sources, have used diplomatic lines of communication in recent days, but significant uncertainty remains over the near-term trajectory of the conflict and whether strikes on Gulf states and energy targets will continue.

Risks

  • Continued strikes on Gulf states and on critical energy infrastructure could trigger reciprocal military action or the opening of Saudi bases to U.S. forces, increasing regional military engagement - risk to energy production and global energy markets.
  • Divergent statements from Iran’s civilian leadership and its military command create uncertainty over adherence to any suspension of attacks, elevating the chance of further strikes against Gulf states or U.S. and Israeli assets - risk to regional security and defense logistics.
  • Requests by Iran for closure of U.S. bases and for Gulf states to stop intelligence-sharing with Washington, if unresolved, could sustain tensions and impede de-escalation efforts - risk to diplomatic channels and coalition operations.

More from World

Blast at Trujillo Nightclub Injures More Than 30, Authorities Say Mar 7, 2026 Power Strains Deepen in Tehran as Leadership Grapples with Sustained Strikes Mar 7, 2026 Venezuela’s Acting President Calls for Diplomatic Dialogue as Ties with U.S. Are Restored Mar 7, 2026 Iranian Hardliners Press for Rapid Appointment of New Supreme Leader Mar 7, 2026 27-year-old Palestinian killed by Israeli settler in Masafer Yatta, Palestinian health officials say Mar 7, 2026