World February 22, 2026

Regional Rebuke After U.S. Envoy Suggests Biblical Claim Over Middle East

Remarks by U.S. ambassador in an interview prompt a multi-country statement calling them 'dangerous and inflammatory' and a potential threat to regional stability

By Priya Menon
Regional Rebuke After U.S. Envoy Suggests Biblical Claim Over Middle East

Comments by U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee — invoking biblical language when asked about territorial claims — provoked a formal condemnation from a coalition of Middle Eastern and Muslim-majority countries. The joint statement characterized the remarks as violating international law and endangering regional security. A U.S. Embassy spokesperson said the comments do not represent a shift in U.S. policy and that the ambassador made clear Israel does not seek to change its borders.

Key Points

  • Aired interview in which U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee referenced biblical claims as justification for broad territorial entitlement triggered regional condemnation.
  • A coalition of countries including Jordan, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Palestinians called the remarks "dangerous and inflammatory" and said they threaten regional security and violate international law.
  • A U.S. Embassy spokesperson stated the comments do not reflect a change in U.S. policy and that Huckabee’s fuller remarks indicated Israel does not seek to alter its current borders.

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee’s remarks suggesting a biblical entitlement to large swaths of the Middle East have prompted a strong rebuke from a group of countries across the region.

Huckabee, an evangelical Christian with a long record of political support for Israel and defense of Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was interviewed in Israel on Wednesday by conservative U.S. talk show host Tucker Carlson. The interview aired on Friday. During the exchange, Carlson asked if the modern state of Israel had a right to territory described in the book of Genesis as promised by God to Abraham - a description that, if read literally, spans territory from the Euphrates River to the Nile and would cover a large part of the Middle East.

Responding to that line of questioning, Huckabee said: "It would be fine if they took it all. But I don’t think that’s what we’re talking about here today." He went on to frame the matter in terms of Israel’s current posture, stating: "We’re talking about this land that the state of Israel now lives in and wants to have peace in, they’re not trying to take over Jordan, they’re not trying to take over Syria, they’re not trying to take over Iraq or anywhere else. They want to protect their people."

Within days of the interview’s broadcast, a collective of governments and the Palestinian leadership issued a joint statement condemning the ambassador’s comments. The signatories included Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia and Pakistan, alongside the Palestinians. The statement described the remarks as "dangerous and inflammatory," and said they constituted "a flagrant violation of the principles of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and pose a grave threat to the security and stability of the region."

Most countries regard Israeli settlements in territory occupied after the 1967 conflict as illegal under international law; Israel disputes that interpretation and points to biblical and historical connections to the land. Huckabee has been a long-standing defender of Jewish settlements in the West Bank, territory that the Palestinians seek for a future state.

Following the outcry, a U.S. Embassy spokesperson emphasized that Huckabee’s comments do not indicate any change in official U.S. policy. The spokesperson added that the ambassador’s full remarks made clear that Israel has no desire to alter its current boundaries.

Israeli officials did not immediately provide a response to either the interview or the regional statement condemning the ambassador’s remarks.


Contextual note: The controversy centers on language about territorial entitlement rooted in a biblical citation used in the interview and the diplomatic repercussions that followed when multiple governments publicly denounced the statements.

Risks

  • Escalation of diplomatic tensions among Middle Eastern states and between those states and the United States - sectors affected: diplomacy and geopolitical risk assessments.
  • Heightened concerns about regional security and stability following public statements perceived as territorial claims - sectors affected: defense and security planning.
  • Potential market and investor sensitivity to geopolitical statements that could influence regional stability assessments - sector affected: risk-sensitive capital allocation and defense contracting.

More from World

UAE Stops Wave of AI-Enabled Cyberattacks; Financial Services Put on Alert Feb 22, 2026 Lula Warns Against a 'New Cold War' Ahead of Washington Visit Feb 22, 2026 India Pauses Washington Trade Mission After U.S. Tariff Ruling Triggers Legal Turmoil Feb 22, 2026 Japan Warns of Trade Turbulence as LDP Official Faults 'Real Mess' in U.S. Tariffs Feb 22, 2026 Widespread Missile and Drone Strikes Target Ukrainian Energy Network, Officials Say Feb 22, 2026