World February 11, 2026

Poland and Italy Decline Participation in U.S. 'Board of Peace', Citing Constitutional and Political Concerns

Warsaw and Rome say they will not join the new U.S. initiative as questions remain about the board's scope and authority

By Maya Rios
Poland and Italy Decline Participation in U.S. 'Board of Peace', Citing Constitutional and Political Concerns

Poland and Italy announced they will not participate in U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, citing national reservations and constitutional constraints. The initiative, first framed as a mechanism to help secure a Gaza ceasefire, is being positioned by the White House for a broader role in resolving international conflicts - an expansion that has prompted caution among several Western allies, particularly after invitations were extended to Russia and Belarus.

Key Points

  • Poland and Italy have announced they will not join the U.S. Board of Peace at this time, citing national doubts and constitutional constraints - impacts diplomacy and international governance.
  • The Board of Peace was initially aimed at supporting a Gaza ceasefire but is being presented by the U.S. as having a possible broader role in global conflict resolution - this raises questions about the balance of multilateral institutions.
  • Italy signaled willingness to engage in reconstruction efforts in the Middle East even while declining membership, indicating potential involvement in post-conflict rebuilding work that affects aid and reconstruction sectors.

Poland and Italy confirmed on Wednesday that they will not become members of U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, joining other allied governments that have so far stayed on the sidelines of the initiative.

The Board of Peace was initially presented as a tool to help consolidate a ceasefire in Gaza. According to U.S. statements, the administration envisions the body potentially taking on a wider remit in mediating global disputes - a scope that has raised concerns among some countries that the board could evolve into a rival to the United Nations.

Poland’s decision was announced by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who spoke at a government meeting. "Taking into account certain national doubts regarding the shape of the board, under these circumstances Poland will not join the work of the Board of Peace, but we will analyse it," he said. Tusk emphasized that relations with the United States remain a priority for Poland, adding that Warsaw would not rule out participation if the circumstances change to allow for it.

The Polish leader was scheduled to meet later on Wednesday with President Karol Nawrocki at a National Security Council session, where the Board of Peace was listed on the agenda.

In Rome, Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani confirmed Italy would similarly refrain from joining the initiative. "We cannot join the Board of Peace because there is an insurmountable constitutional barrier on Italy’s side," he told Sky TG24. He also said: "However, if we need to work on reconstruction efforts aimed at ensuring peace in the Middle East, we are ready to do so."

Italian officials say the country's constitution permits participation in international organizations only on equal footing with other states. Rome has concluded that the current statute of the Board of Peace does not meet that requirement because it grants extensive executive powers to President Trump.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has a close political relationship with President Trump, publicly requested last month that he amend the board's terms so Italy could join. The existing formulation of the board has therefore prevented Italy from signing up, despite indications Rome would participate in reconstruction work related to Middle East peace efforts.


The invitations extended to Russia and Belarus have been cited as an additional reason many Western countries have adopted a cautious posture toward the board. Those invitations, together with unresolved questions about the board's authority and membership rules, have left several allies hesitant to engage at this stage.

Both Warsaw and Rome said they would continue to monitor developments and evaluate any future changes to the board's structure or mandate that might address their stated concerns.

Risks

  • Perceived overlap or rivalry with the United Nations - could complicate multilateral coordination in diplomacy and international organizations.
  • Invitations to Russia and Belarus have made several Western allies cautious, creating uncertainty around coalition makeup and the board's legitimacy - affects diplomatic alignment and international cooperation.
  • Italy’s constitutional prohibition under the board’s current statute limits Rome’s ability to join unless the terms are amended, leaving open the possibility of future renegotiation but creating short-term legal constraints - impacts legal and governance processes for international initiatives.

More from World

Fitch Keeps UK at AA- Citing Flexible Economy but Flags High Debt and Policy Uncertainty Feb 20, 2026 Fitch Maintains Congo's CCC+ Rating, Flags Persistent Debt and Governance Weaknesses Feb 20, 2026 Moody's Upholds Sweden's Aaa Rating, Cites Strong Fiscal Fundamentals Feb 20, 2026 Moody’s Keeps Tanzania at B1 as Growth Strengths Counterbalance Institutional and Political Risks Feb 20, 2026 S&P Upgrades Armenia Outlook to Positive Citing Growth and Security Improvements Feb 20, 2026