World February 11, 2026

Netanyahu Says Israel Will Join Trump’s 'Board of Peace' During Washington Visit

Accession announced after meetings with U.S. leadership as first board session plans focus on Gaza reconstruction

By Sofia Navarro
Netanyahu Says Israel Will Join Trump’s 'Board of Peace' During Washington Visit

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that Israel has formally joined the U.S.-led 'Board of Peace' while in Washington for meetings with U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The board, authorized by a mid-November U.N. Security Council resolution and linked to a fragile October ceasefire in Gaza under a Trump plan, will meet in Washington on February 19 to discuss reconstruction. The move is expected to draw criticism because the board does not include Palestinian representation and observers warn it could undermine U.N. authority.

Key Points

  • Israel formally joined the U.S.-led 'Board of Peace' during Prime Minister Netanyahus Washington visit after meetings with President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio - sectors impacted: international relations, defense.
  • The board was authorized by a mid-November U.N. Security Council resolution and is linked to the October ceasefire in Gaza under a Trump-backed plan; its first meeting is set for February 19 to discuss Gaza reconstruction - sectors impacted: reconstruction, humanitarian aid, infrastructure.
  • Several countries have responded cautiously to the board since its late January launch, with some Middle Eastern allies joining and many Western allies declining, raising questions about international legitimacy and multilateral coordination - sectors impacted: diplomacy, global governance.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that Israel has signed on to U.S. President Donald Trump’s "Board of Peace" initiative during a Washington visit that included meetings with President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Following his meeting with Rubio, Netanyahu posted on X that he had "signed Israels accession as a member of the 'Board of Peace.'" His trip to the U.S. capital was aimed at discussions with Trump about Iran, according to his public comments.

The board itself was authorized, along with the possibility for countries acting with it to create an international stabilization force in Gaza, by a U.N. Security Council resolution adopted in mid-November. The board is tied to a Trump plan that helped secure a fragile ceasefire in Gaza in October, an arrangement to which both Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas agreed.

Under the framework set out in the Trump Gaza plan, the board was intended to oversee Gazas temporary governance. Trump later stated that he would chair the board and that it would be broadened to address conflicts beyond Gaza.

Officials plan for the board to hold its inaugural meeting on February 19 in Washington, with Gaza reconstruction on the agenda.


Reaction to the board has been mixed and cautious. Several rights experts have criticized the concept of a board chaired by Trump to supervise affairs in a foreign territory, saying it bore similarities to a colonial structure. Israels inclusion on the board is anticipated to fuel additional criticism because the board does not include a Palestinian representative.

Countries responded carefully to Trumps invitation to join the board, which was launched in late January. The article notes that some of Washingtons Middle Eastern allies have accepted invitations to participate, while a substantial number of the United Statess traditional Western allies have declined to take part.

Concerns have been raised by many experts that the board could undermine the United Nations. Those concerns, together with the uneven international response, underscore the sensitivity surrounding the initiative.


The ceasefire that began in October under the Trump plan has been repeatedly violated, with Gaza health officials reporting at least 580 Palestinians killed since it began, and reports that four Israeli soldiers have been killed during the same period.

The Gaza health ministry reports that Israels assault has resulted in more than 72,000 deaths among Palestinians, has produced a hunger crisis, and has internally displaced Gazas entire population. Multiple rights experts, scholars and a U.N. inquiry have stated that these actions amount to genocide. Israel describes its military campaign as an act of self-defense after a late 2023 attack by Hamas-led militants that killed 1,200 people and resulted in more than 250 hostages taken.

The developments around the Board of Peace, the political dynamics of its composition, the contested humanitarian situation in Gaza, and the differing international responses set the stage for a contentious first meeting on February 19 in Washington, where reconstruction of Gaza will be discussed.

Risks

  • Legitimacy and criticism risk: Israels membership on a board that lacks Palestinian representation is expected to generate criticism and could harm the boards perceived legitimacy - sectors affected: diplomacy, international aid coordination.
  • Potential erosion of U.N. authority: Experts have expressed concern that the board might undermine the United Nations, creating uncertainty for multilateral processes in conflict resolution - sectors affected: global governance, international law.
  • Security and humanitarian risk: Repeated ceasefire violations and the high casualty figures and displacement reported in Gaza create uncertainty for reconstruction and humanitarian operations planned by the board - sectors affected: humanitarian assistance, infrastructure reconstruction, defense contractors.

More from World

Appeals Court Clears Way for Louisiana Ten Commandments Classroom Requirement Feb 20, 2026 Fitch Keeps UK at AA- Citing Flexible Economy but Flags High Debt and Policy Uncertainty Feb 20, 2026 Fitch Maintains Congo's CCC+ Rating, Flags Persistent Debt and Governance Weaknesses Feb 20, 2026 Moody's Upholds Sweden's Aaa Rating, Cites Strong Fiscal Fundamentals Feb 20, 2026 Moody’s Keeps Tanzania at B1 as Growth Strengths Counterbalance Institutional and Political Risks Feb 20, 2026