World February 17, 2026

Mistrial Declared in Case Involving Stanford Students After 2024 Pro-Palestinian Occupation

Jury deadlocks in prosecution over damage to university president’s office; district attorney says he will seek a new trial

By Maya Rios
Mistrial Declared in Case Involving Stanford Students After 2024 Pro-Palestinian Occupation

A Santa Clara County judge declared a mistrial after jurors failed to reach unanimous verdicts in the case of five current and former Stanford students charged over a 2024 pro-Palestinian occupation that left the university president’s office damaged. The jury split on felony counts of vandalism and conspiracy to trespass, and prosecutors have indicated they will pursue further legal action.

Key Points

  • A mistrial was declared after jurors in Santa Clara County failed to reach unanimous verdicts in the case of five current and former Stanford students charged over a 2024 occupation of the university president’s office.
  • Prosecutors originally charged 12 protesters with felony vandalism; police arrested 13 people on June 5, 2024 and the university said the building sustained "extensive" damage, with prosecutors citing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages.
  • The charges were among the most serious brought in relation to the 2024 pro-Palestinian campus protests demanding an end to Israel’s war in Gaza, a change in U.S. policy, and divestment from companies seen as supporting Israel; some students faced suspension, expulsion and degree revocation.

A judge in Santa Clara County Superior Court declared a mistrial on Friday in the prosecution of five current and former Stanford University students connected to a 2024 pro-Palestinian demonstration that culminated with demonstrators occupying and damaging the university president’s office.

Prosecutors had originally charged 12 protesters last year with felony vandalism, saying at least one person entered the building by breaking a window. Police arrested 13 people on June 5, 2024 in connection with the incident, and the university has said the building suffered "extensive" damage.

The case that proceeded to trial involved five defendants facing felony charges of vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. Others who had been charged in relation to the occupation previously resolved their cases through plea agreements or diversion programs, according to court records presented during the proceedings.

After deliberation, the jury was unable to reach unanimous decisions, resulting in the mistrial. During its vote, the panel recorded a 9-3 split in favor of conviction on the felony vandalism count and an 8-4 split in favor of conviction on the felony conspiracy to trespass count. Jurors ultimately failed to deliver a verdict.

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen commented on the outcome, saying, "This case is about a group of people who destroyed someone else’s property and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage. That is against the law." He added that he will pursue a new trial.

One attorney representing a defendant framed the protest activity differently. Anthony Brass, speaking to the New York Times, said his client was not defending lawlessness but rather "the concept of transparency and ethical investment." Brass characterized the outcome as a victory for the students and for free speech, stating, "This is a win for these young people of conscience and a win for free speech," and added, "humanitarian activism has no place in a criminal courtroom."

The charges in this case were among the most serious brought against participants in the wider 2024 pro-Palestinian protest movement on U.S. college campuses. Those demonstrations called for an end to Israel’s war in Gaza, a halt to Washington’s support for Israel, and the divestment of university funds from companies perceived to support Israel.

The protesters involved in the Stanford incident had renamed the university building "Dr. Adnan’s Office" in honor of Adnan Al-Bursh, a Palestinian doctor who died in an Israeli prison after months of detention. Media tallies show that more than 3,000 people were arrested during the broader 2024 U.S. pro-Palestinian protest movement, and some students involved in campus demonstrations faced disciplinary measures including suspension, expulsion and degree revocation.

With the mistrial recorded, the court and the parties now face uncertainty over whether the district attorney will proceed with a new prosecution of the five defendants or otherwise resolve the outstanding charges.

Risks

  • Possibility of a retrial - The district attorney has stated he will seek a new trial, creating continued legal uncertainty for the defendants and potential additional costs for the court system and university legal exposure (impacts higher education and legal services sectors).
  • Campus operational and financial impacts - The incident involved extensive damage and prosecutors cited hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses, presenting risks to university budgets, insurance claims, and campus security planning (impacts higher education finance and campus operations).
  • Disciplinary and reputational consequences - Ongoing disciplinary actions such as suspension, expulsion and degree revocation for students linked to 2024 protests may affect student outcomes and university reputations (impacts higher education administration and student services).

More from World

Catholic clergy regain access to Broadview immigration center, distribute ashes and communion after court order Feb 20, 2026 Congress Poised to Vote on Curtailing President’s Authority to Strike Iran as Military Prepares Feb 20, 2026 Tentative Agreement Reached to End Six-Week Nurses Strike in New York City Feb 20, 2026 Trump Says He Is Weighing a Limited Military Strike on Iran Feb 20, 2026 Explainer: Possible Charge Facing King Charles’ Brother After Arrest Feb 20, 2026