World March 17, 2026

Kallas Urges U.S. and Israel to End Conflict with Iran; EU Pursues Diplomatic Options

EU foreign policy chief says bloc is consulting regional partners and is open to naval participation only as part of a diplomatic settlement

By Marcus Reed
Kallas Urges U.S. and Israel to End Conflict with Iran; EU Pursues Diplomatic Options

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas urged the United States and Israel to bring their war with Iran to a close and said the EU is engaged in talks with Middle Eastern governments about diplomatic measures to end the fighting. While not ruling out European involvement in protecting navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, Kallas said any participation would most likely follow a negotiated solution. She also proposed exploring a U.N.-style corridor model to keep critical exports moving.

Key Points

  • EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has publicly called for the United States and Israel to end their war with Iran and said the EU is engaging regional partners to seek a diplomatic resolution.
  • European countries have largely rejected U.S. requests to join a mission to clear the Strait of Hormuz, citing unwillingness to risk personnel in a conflict they did not initiate; this reluctance affects naval and shipping security planning.
  • Kallas proposed exploring a U.N.-style export corridor model, similar to the arrangement used for Ukrainian grain through the Black Sea, to preserve the flow of energy, food, and fertilizers while avoiding military escalation.

BRUSSELS - European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas told Reuters in Brussels that the United States and Israel should bring their war with Iran to an end and that the EU is consulting with regional governments on ways to secure a ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution.

Kallas said the EU was discussing options with neighbors in the Middle East and that Europe could offer diplomatic support to bring the parties together. "We have been consulting with regional countries like the Gulf countries, Jordan, Egypt, (about) whether we could also bring forward proposals for Iran, Israel and the U.S. to get out of this situation so that everybody saves face," she said, without providing additional details on the conversations.

Asked whether it was time to end the war, Kallas responded: "Absolutely. I think ... it would be in the interest of everybody if this war stops. The problem with wars is that it’s easier to start than to stop them, and it always gets out of hand." The comment framed the EU position as one favoring negotiated disengagement rather than military escalation.

On the question of restoring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, Kallas said the door remained open to European participation but that any such role would probably be tied to a broader diplomatic solution. Multiple European governments have declined U.S. President Donald Trump’s calls to join a mission to reopen the Strait - a key corridor for oil, gas and other goods that Iran has largely blocked. Kallas reiterated that leaders across Europe have been unwilling to place their forces in harm’s way in a war they did not initiate.

"Nobody is ready to put their people in harm’s way in the Strait of Hormuz," she said. "We have to find ... diplomatic ways to keep this open so that we don’t have a ... food crisis, fertilisers crisis, energy crisis in the world." Her comments underscore EU concerns that disruptions in the Strait could ripple through commodity markets and supply chains, affecting energy supplies as well as shipments of foodstuffs and fertilizers.

Kallas also acknowledged tensions between Europe and the United States over the conduct and objectives of U.S. policy in Iran since President Trump returned to the White House in January last year. "The main concern of the European countries is that we were not consulted with (before) starting this war - actually the opposite. There were many Europeans who were trying to convince the U.S. and Israel not to start this war," she said, adding that Europe has become accustomed to Washington’s unpredictability and has responded with what she described as "more calm" approaches.

European leaders have warned that joining a U.S.-led operation in the Strait could expose their forces to danger and have pointed to the lack of consultation prior to the onset of hostilities as a reason for reluctance. President Trump has warned that European hesitation could have negative consequences for the NATO alliance; Kallas’ remarks reflect persistent diplomatic friction stemming from those disagreements.

To address the immediate logistical and humanitarian impacts of the conflict, Kallas proposed considering a model similar to a U.N.-brokered arrangement used to allow Ukraine to export grain, foodstuffs and fertilizers from the Black Sea during wartime without civilian vessels coming under attack. She said she had discussed the concept with U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and that the U.N. was "working on this."

"Now the question is what also the neighbouring countries could agree to, especially Iran," Kallas said, pointing to the practical and political hurdles in implementing a corridor or protected export mechanism in the Strait of Hormuz. She emphasized that any European contribution to keeping the shipping lane open would most likely be tied to diplomatic progress rather than unilateral military action.

Throughout the interview, Kallas framed the EU role as primarily diplomatic: offering to convene parties, propose face-saving measures and consult regional actors on feasible paths out of the crisis. She did not outline specific proposals, troop commitments, or timelines, and provided no operational details about how a navigational corridor would be enforced if agreement were reached.


Contextual note: Kallas’ comments were delivered in Brussels during an interview with Reuters. She spoke about ongoing consultations with Gulf states, Jordan and Egypt, and about contacts with the United Nations related to safeguarding exports through contested waterways.

Risks

  • Ongoing disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could drive higher energy prices and strain European energy and logistics sectors if diplomatic measures fail.
  • Refusal by European governments to participate militarily in operations to reopen the Strait increases uncertainty over maritime security and could complicate NATO relations, affecting defense planning and alliance cohesion.
  • Efforts to establish a protected export corridor would require agreement from neighboring states, notably Iran, creating political uncertainty that could delay or prevent measures to avert food and fertilizer supply shocks.

More from World

White House Adviser Says Tankers Are Beginning to Pass Through Strait of Hormuz as U.S. Monitors Supply Flows Mar 17, 2026 U.S. Navy Contract Propels Gecko Robotics' Hull-Climbing and Aerial Inspectors into Pacific Fleet Mar 17, 2026 Mette Frederiksen Seeks Third Term as Voters Weigh Foreign Defiance Against Domestic Strain Mar 17, 2026 Kabul Strike Deepens Pakistan-Afghanistan Confrontation Mar 17, 2026 U.N. Fact-Finding Team Opens Probe into Deadly Strike on Iranian Primary School Mar 17, 2026