World February 26, 2026

Denver bars ICE from city property, directs police to protect peaceful protesters

Mayor signs directive forbidding federal immigration enforcement on municipal land and instructs local officers to intervene if ICE uses excessive force

By Caleb Monroe
Denver bars ICE from city property, directs police to protect peaceful protesters

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston has issued an executive order that prohibits U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from using city-owned property for operations and directs Denver law enforcement to protect peaceful demonstrators during civil immigration enforcement. The move follows similar orders in other Democratic-led cities and comes amid a federal crackdown on immigration that has drawn criticism from rights groups.

Key Points

  • Denver’s mayor has signed an order banning ICE from using city-owned property for enforcement and directing police to protect peaceful protesters during civil immigration operations - impacts municipal law enforcement and local government operations.
  • Similar directives have been issued by other Democratic mayors, including Minneapolis, reflecting a pattern of municipal actions in response to federal immigration enforcement - relevant to intergovernmental relations and public-sector financing.
  • The White House has urged cooperation with ICE and warned that cities that resist could face federal funding consequences - a factor affecting municipal budgets and public-sector financial planning.

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston on Thursday signed an order that bars U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from staging operations on city-owned property and authorizes Denver law enforcement to shield peaceful protestors from federal immigration enforcement activities.

The directive instructs the city’s police to act in the face of civil immigration enforcement operations - including scenarios involving an influx of ICE agents - by relying on established de-escalation procedures to protect peaceful demonstrators and to safeguard public health, safety, and free speech rights.

Johnston described a standard he said will apply equally to federal agents and local officers. "If we see any ICE officer using excessive force against a Denver resident, we will step in to detain that officer and remove them from the situation," he said at a news conference announcing the order. "We hold our own officers to that standard, and we will hold any ICE agent to the same," he added.

The measure follows similar actions by other Democratic mayors and governors in response to a federal immigration enforcement campaign. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey earlier signed an order that prevents agencies from using any city-owned parking lots, ramps, garages, or vacant lots to stage immigration enforcement operations.

Officials in the White House pushed back against such local measures. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement cited by Politico that local officials should coordinate with ICE rather than oppose it, adding: "Anyone doing otherwise is simply doing the bidding of criminal illegal aliens."

The administration has framed its enforcement efforts as aimed at reducing illegal immigration and enhancing domestic security. It has also threatened to withhold federal funding from cities and states that do not align with its policies.

Advocates for civil rights have criticized the federal crackdown, saying it has fostered an environment of fear among both citizens and immigrants and has raised concerns about violations of due process and free speech rights.


Context and immediate effects

Johnston’s order directs local law enforcement to prioritize de-escalation and the preservation of constitutional rights during any civil immigration enforcement activity that involves increased federal presence. The directive also explicitly bans the use of city property by ICE to carry out operations.

Officials in other Democratic-led municipalities have enacted comparable restrictions on federal enforcement staging areas, highlighting a pattern of local responses to recent federal immigration actions.


Implications for local-federal relations

The order underscores a growing tension between municipal authorities in Democratic jurisdictions and federal immigration agencies. The White House response emphasizes an expectation that local governments work in cooperation with federal enforcement rather than impose local limitations.

The debate centers on balancing federal immigration enforcement priorities and local commitments to protect protesters and community members from what local leaders and rights groups describe as heavy-handed tactics.

Risks

  • Potential tension between federal and local authorities over immigration enforcement could strain municipal-federal relations and affect coordination on public safety - relevant to government and legal services sectors.
  • The White House's threat to freeze federal funding for noncompliant cities introduces fiscal uncertainty for municipal budgets and public services - impacting city finances and public-sector contractors.
  • Criticism from rights groups that enforcement practices create fear and may violate due process and free speech presents legal and reputational risks for federal enforcement agencies and could prompt litigation - affecting legal services and civil rights advocacy sectors.

More from World

Philippines, Japan and U.S. Conduct Joint Naval Exercises in the South China Sea Feb 26, 2026 Chicago Holds Public Memorials as Lines Form to Honor Jesse Jackson Feb 26, 2026 Former F-35 Instructor Arrested on Charges He Trained Chinese Military Pilots Feb 26, 2026 U.S. Sets Ambitious Goal to Process 4,500 White South African Refugee Cases Monthly, Document Shows Feb 26, 2026 Washington Presses Damascus to Shift Away from Chinese Telecom Equipment Feb 26, 2026