Trade Ideas February 2, 2026

Why I'm Increasing My Conviction in Berkshire Hathaway: A Practical Long Trade

Greg Abel’s Berkshire has the balance sheet, cash optionality and reasonable valuation to outperform over the next 180 trading days.

By Priya Menon BRK.A
Why I'm Increasing My Conviction in Berkshire Hathaway: A Practical Long Trade
BRK.A

Berkshire Hathaway is a diversified cash-generative conglomerate trading at a reasonable multiple with a fortress balance sheet and active capital allocation under CEO Greg Abel. This trade idea lays out a clear long entry at the current price, a conservative stop and an upside target based on tangible valuation and catalyst paths over a 180 trading day horizon.

Key Points

  • Berkshire trades at ~15.4x P/E and ~1.49x P/B with a market cap of about $1.05 trillion.
  • Free cash flow of roughly $19.3 billion and conservative leverage (debt-to-equity ~0.18) give management capital to deploy.
  • Actionable trade: enter at $730,967.23, stop $690,000, target $820,000, horizon 180 trading days.
  • Catalysts include active capital deployment, energy investments, insurance underwriting improvement and BNSF performance.

Hook & thesis

Berkshire Hathaway is not a story stock, and that’s exactly why I’m more bullish now than I’ve been in years. The company sits on a massive balance sheet, generates meaningful free cash flow and is trading at a single-digit-to-teen multiple that still leaves room for upside as capital is deployed. With Warren Buffett stepping aside at the end of 2025 and Greg Abel now running the show, Berkshire has the optionality to convert cash into high-return operating assets or to buy back stock at attractive prices. I expect that disciplined deployment - plus favorable pockets of performance in energy and insurance - will drive the shares higher over the next 180 trading days.

My actionable stance: take a long position at the market today with a clearly defined stop and target. Entry at the current level ($730,967.23), a protective stop at $690,000 to limit downside on any near-term allocation shocks, and a target at $820,000 that reflects a move back toward the prior 52-week high and incremental multiple expansion as capital is put to work.

What Berkshire does and why the market should care

Berkshire Hathaway is a diversified holding company with businesses spanning insurance (GEICO, reinsurance), freight rail (BNSF), regulated utilities and energy (Berkshire Hathaway Energy), manufacturing, wholesale distribution and retail services. The mix matters: insurance generates float and underwriting income, BNSF provides durable cash flow tied to economic activity, and BHE gives regulated utility-like earnings plus merchant power exposure.

The market should care because Berkshire’s combination of scale and flexibility is rare. Management controls a war chest and a diversified fleet of cash-generative assets; the company reported free cash flow of $19.326 billion. Its balance-sheet metrics and valuation provide both downside protection and upside optionality: enterprise value is roughly $1.090 trillion versus a market cap of about $1.051 trillion, P/E is roughly 15.4 and price-to-book sits at ~1.49. That is not frothy for a conglomerate with a near-double-digit return on equity (ROE ~9.66%).

Supporting numbers

  • Market cap: roughly $1.05 trillion (snapshot).
  • Price-to-earnings: 15.4x; price-to-book: 1.49x.
  • Free cash flow: $19.326 billion annually.
  • Return on equity: 9.66%; debt-to-equity: 0.18 - conservative leverage.
  • 52-week range: low $682,280.02, high $812,855.00. Current price approximately $730,967.23.

Valuation framing

Berkshire trades at roughly 15.4x trailing earnings and about 1.5x book. For a conglomerate where a meaningful portion of value can sit below book (insurance float, rail franchise, regulated utilities), those multiples read as reasonable. Berkshire’s enterprise value of ~ $1.09 trillion versus market cap of ~$1.05 trillion implies a relatively modest net debt/enterprise structure considering the scale of cash and investable assets it controls.

Two practical valuation anchors guide the trade: (1) the 52-week high of $812,855 is a clear technical and sentiment-based target if capital deployment proves accretive; (2) a re-rating scenario where successful buybacks/investments lift the P/E modestly toward 17–18x would also push intrinsic value meaningfully higher, given free cash flow of ~$19.3 billion and durable earnings power.

Catalysts (2-5)

  • Active capital deployment under Greg Abel: management has significant cash optionality and has started redeploying capital into energy and select equities. Clear, value-accretive deals or sustained buybacks would re-rate the stock.
  • Energy bet working: prior allocations into Chevron, Occidental and other energy positions could deliver earnings tailwinds if commodity prices remain firm and integrated assets perform.
  • Insurance underwriting and float growth: a stable to improving underwriting environment would expand margins and increase investable float.
  • Macro sensitivity with upside from industrial demand and freight volumes at BNSF if U.S. economic activity stabilizes or accelerates.

Trade plan (actionable)

Direction: Long.

Entry: $730,967.23 (current market level).

Stop loss: $690,000. This is a tactical stop placed under key psychological and historical support near the year low area to limit capital loss if a broad re-rating or unexpected capital allocation shock occurs.

Target: $820,000. This target reflects a move above the 52-week high ($812,855) and assumes either modest multiple expansion or strong capital-deployment headlines over the next six months.

Horizon: long term (180 trading days). The rationale: capital allocation outcomes and earnings contributions from energy and insurance unfold over months, not days, so give the story time to play out across business cycles and potential deal announcements.

Why this trade makes sense

This is a capital-allocation, value-recovery trade. Berkshire’s fundamentals (free cash flow, conservative leverage, diversified cash-generative businesses) reduce downside risk relative to many single-sector names. At the same time, the market is signaling that Berkshire’s next chapter under Abel is still unpriced, creating a gap that can be closed by disciplined repurchases, accretive M&A, or improving operating trends in insurance and energy.

Risks and counterarguments

No thesis is without plausible counters. Here are the main risks and one explicit counterargument to my bullish stance:

  • Capital allocation missteps: If new deployments (large energy buys or takeover attempts) are poor or priced too aggressively, earnings and book value could be impaired. Poor M&A could compress multiples.
  • Macroeconomic shock or credit stress: A sharp economic downturn could hit BNSF freight volumes, insurance losses could spike, and markets could mark down portfolio positions, pressuring the stock.
  • Management transition risk: Warren Buffett’s retirement at the end of 2025 and the continuing transition to Greg Abel creates execution uncertainty. Strategic decisions in the first year under new leadership will be scrutinized and could trigger volatility.
  • Regulatory or energy price risk: Berkshire’s large energy exposure means swings in oil & gas prices or regulatory shifts could affect earnings unpredictably.
  • Counterargument: One could argue that Buffett’s reduced public involvement and the sale of sizable Bank of America stakes show a conservative de-risking posture that undermines future growth potential. If management remains overly cautious with deployment and simply sits on cash, the stock could languish without a catalyst to unlock value.

Mitigants and why I still favor the trade

Berkshire’s capital structure and track record are mitigants. Debt-to-equity is only ~0.18, ROE is near 10%, and the company generates nearly $20 billion of free cash flow. Even a slower pace of deployment still leaves room for opportunistic share repurchases that lift per-share intrinsic value. Additionally, the market appears to have priced in some transition risk already: the stock is nearer the 52-week low than the high and trades at reasonable P/E and P/B ratios. That gives the long position a favorable asymmetric payoff if management executes.

What would change my mind

I would reassess the bullish thesis if any of the following occur: a string of value-destructive acquisitions, a materially weaker insurance underwriting cycle that erodes float and profitability, or a macro event that meaningfully impairs BNSF’s earnings for multiple quarters. Conversely, clearer, accelerated buybacks or highly accretive deals would increase my price target and conviction.

Conclusion - clear stance

My base case: Berkshire outperforms over a 180 trading day window as capital allocation under Greg Abel begins to produce incremental earnings and market sentiment swings back toward a value appreciation phase. The actionable trade - enter at $730,967.23, stop at $690,000, and target $820,000 - uses conservative stop placement and a realistic upside tied to the company’s history and current valuation. Risk is real, but the balance of cash flow, conservative leverage and cheap multiples make the long side compelling.

Trade plan summary: Long BRK.A at $730,967.23 / Stop $690,000 / Target $820,000 / Horizon: long term (180 trading days).

Risks

  • Capital allocation missteps from new management could impair book value and earnings.
  • A macro slowdown that hits freight volumes and insurance losses could depress cash flow.
  • Regulatory changes or adverse commodity moves could make Berkshire’s energy positions volatile.
  • Market punishes continued cash hoarding without demonstrable accretive deployments.

More from Trade Ideas

OneSpan: Defensive Growth With Real Cash Flow—A Mid-Term Long As Sentiment Cools Feb 21, 2026 W.P. Carey: 138% Coverage and a 5% Yield — A Mid- to Long-Term Income Buy Feb 21, 2026 Coupang: Data-Breach Fallout Is Not Over - A Short Trade with a 180-Day Horizon Feb 20, 2026 Buy the Dip: Upgrading AMD for a Mid-Term Rebound Feb 20, 2026 Buy the DNOW Dip: MRC Integration Noise Creates a Tactical Entry Feb 20, 2026