Trade Ideas May 25, 2026 07:05 AM

Buy TMC on the Dip - Play the Critical Minerals Supply Chain Reopening

A speculative long with a clear entry, stop and upside tied to regulatory and execution catalysts

By Hana Yamamoto TMC

TMC the metals company (TMC) is a high-risk, high-reward play on deep-sea polymetallic nodules that contain nickel, cobalt, copper and manganese. With a new Allseas contract, favorable regulatory momentum and a market cap of $2.34B that represents only a sliver of the company's cited NPV of its resources, now is an actionable dip to take a measured long position. This trade plan lays out entry at $5.40, stop at $4.20 and a target of $9.00 over a long-term (180 trading days) horizon while highlighting clear execution and regulatory risks.

Buy TMC on the Dip - Play the Critical Minerals Supply Chain Reopening
TMC

Key Points

  • Entry at $5.40 with a stop at $4.20 and target at $9.00 over a 180 trading-day horizon.
  • Market cap ~$2.34B versus cited resource NPV near $23.6-$23.9B - market is pricing heavy execution and regulatory discount.
  • Recent Allseas contract (05/12/2026) and positive U.S. regulatory signals materially lower technical and permit uncertainty.
  • Company is pre-revenue with negative free cash flow (-$34.3M) and EPS -$0.74; financing and dilution risk remain key.

Hook and thesis

TMC the metals company (ticker: TMC) is a speculative but actionable way to play the global push for secure critical mineral supply. The stock is trading at $5.40 after a pullback from its 52-week high of $11.35, and the recent Allseas contract and favorable regulatory signals tilt the risk/reward in favor of a measured long at current levels.

In plain terms: with a market capitalization of roughly $2.34 billion and cited resource NPV figures in the $23.6-$23.9 billion neighborhood that analysts and company commentary have used, TMC is priced like a company with meaningful execution risk but potentially enormous upside. If you can tolerate high volatility, the current price is an attractive entry to play the regulatory approvals and the build-out of its extraction and onshore processing chain.

Business description - why the market should care

TMC focuses on collecting and processing polymetallic nodules from the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean. Those nodules are high in nickel, copper, cobalt and manganese - metals that are core inputs to battery cathodes, copper wiring and steel alloying. The company plans to supply feedstock for EV battery precursors, copper cathode for power transmission and manganese products for steel.

From a strategic perspective, there are two reasons investors should care. First, raw-material security for EV supply chains is a top geopolitical and industrial theme globally. Policymakers and OEMs are looking to diversify away from single-source supply. Second, TMC's business, if operationalized at scale, addresses multiple metal markets simultaneously - nickel, cobalt, copper and manganese - which reduces single-metal concentration risk relative to a pure-play nickel or copper junior.

What the numbers say

Here are the key figures that matter for framing valuation and risk:

  • Market cap: about $2.34 billion.
  • Enterprise value: roughly $2.22 billion.
  • Shares outstanding: ~433.2 million; float ~212.9 million.
  • Per-share cash: $2.12; current and quick ratios around 2.17 - reflecting a solid near-term liquidity position on a per-share basis.
  • EPS (trailing): -$0.74; free cash flow: -$34.3 million - the company is pre-revenue and cash-consuming.
  • 52-week range: $3.93 - $11.35; current price: $5.40.
  • Average daily volume (30-day): ~5.6 million shares - decent liquidity for an event-driven speculative trade.

Valuation framing is straightforward: the company is being priced at roughly 9-10% of the resource NPV figures public commentary has referenced (company-adjacent NPV estimates near $23.6-$23.9 billion). That gap is a market discount for regulatory, technical and execution risk. In other words, the market is not valuing resource upside fully; it is paying for near-term financing and execution visibility.

Technical and market context

The stock has stabilized near the $5.40 level; its 50-day simple moving average sits close to $5.16 and the 10- and 20-day SMAs are near $5.42 and $5.40 respectively - suggesting the pullback is not a breakdown but rather a consolidation. RSI at ~51 is neutral and MACD still shows bearish momentum but only modestly negative. Short interest sits around 30.9 million shares - days to cover roughly 6.8 on recent volume - a level that can amplify moves during big news-flow events.

Catalysts to drive the trade

  • Allseas contract deployment - 05/12/2026: The definitive contract with Allseas to deploy a commercial collection system materially reduces technology execution risk and brings a partner to fund a portion of development costs.
  • NOAA and U.S. regulatory momentum - ongoing: Recent U.S. regulatory signals and NOAA substantial compliance findings improve the odds of timely permits. Any announced timeline for commercial permit approvals would be a major positive.
  • Brownsville processing hub progress: Evidence of onshore hub construction milestones or permitting for the Texas processing site would show the company moving from engineering to build-out.
  • Commodity price environment: Broad strength in nickel and cobalt prices driven by EV battery demand will lift the underlying project economics and could re-rate the stock independent of permitting.

Trade plan - actionable entry, stop and target

My recommendation: initiate a long position at an entry price of $5.40 with a stop loss at $4.20 and a primary target of $9.00. This is a long-term directional trade meant to capture regulatory approvals, engineering de-risking and early commercial progress over the next several months.

Horizon: long term (180 trading days). Rationale: regulatory review, engineering deployment with Allseas and initial onshore processing milestones are multi-month processes. Expect uneven price action and news-driven spikes; the 180 trading-day horizon gives time for those catalysts to play out and for the market to re-rate the company's optionality. Reassess position size after any material permit approvals or demonstrated construction milestones.

Position sizing guidance: limit exposure to a small portion of speculative capital (for most retail investors, single-digit percent of equity allocation to speculative bucket). Given the company's burn and execution risk, this is not a core long; it is a targeted, event-driven stake.

Risk framework and counterarguments

TMC is a classic speculative resource development story. You are buying primarily optionality - the right to participate if the company secures permits, completes field deployment and transitions to commercial production. The following risks are material and justify a conservative position size:

  • Regulatory risk - A significant portion of TMC's value depends on obtaining extraction permits. Any regulatory delay, revocation or harsher permit conditions would dramatically reduce the valuation case.
  • Execution and technical risk - Deep-sea collection and onshore processing remain unproven at commercial scale for nodules. Even with Allseas involvement, unexpected technical challenges could delay production and increase capital costs.
  • Funding and dilution risk - The company is pre-revenue with negative free cash flow. If development costs escalate, expect equity dilution or expensive project-level financing that could hurt existing shareholders.
  • Environmental and political risk - Deep-sea mining is politically and environmentally sensitive. Shifts in public opinion, litigation or international regulatory pushback could interrupt operations or add costly mitigation requirements.
  • Commodity price volatility - The project economics assume robust nickel, cobalt and copper prices. A sustained downturn in any of those markets reduces project NPV and could lead to re-rating lower.

Counterargument to the buy thesis: one could reasonably argue the market is correctly discounting TMC because of the long timeline to production, substantial execution risk and the possibility that regulatory approval becomes conditional in ways that materially reduce recoverable economics. If you assign a higher probability to permit denial, protracted litigation, or significantly higher capital expenditures, the implied upside evaporates and the stock is a value trap.

What would change my mind

I would reduce conviction or flip to a neutral/negative stance if any of the following occur:

  • The NOAA or relevant licensing authority issues a denial or imposes permit conditions that materially increase capex or lower recoverable resource estimates.
  • The Allseas program stalls, is canceled, or cost-sharing terms deteriorate, signaling higher engineering risk and funding needs for TMC.
  • Company cash runway shortens materially without credible financing and the firm announces a large equity raise at a sharply lower price (material dilution).
  • Commodity markets collapse - a sustained, multi-quarter drop in nickel and cobalt prices that undermines project NAV assumptions.

Conclusion and practical read

At $5.40, TMC offers a measurable asymmetric opportunity: the market cap of about $2.34 billion is tiny relative to cited resource NPVs, but that gap exists for reasons - regulatory uncertainty, execution complexity, and funding needs. The Allseas contract (05/12/2026) and recent positive regulatory signals give this optionality a higher probability of being realized than it had twelve months ago. For event-driven speculators willing to accept volatility, initiating a long at $5.40 with a $4.20 stop and a $9.00 target over 180 trading days is a disciplined way to play upside while limiting downside.

Keep position sizes small, monitor regulatory milestones closely and be ready to re-evaluate after specific permit or construction announcements. This is not a buy for conservative or income-focused investors; it is a targeted speculative trade on the critical-minerals supply story with clearly defined upside catalysts and equally clear execution and regulatory risks.

Risks

  • Regulatory denial or materially restrictive permit conditions could erase most upside.
  • Technical or deployment failure of the collection system would significantly increase costs and delay revenue.
  • Funding shortfalls could force dilutive equity raises or concessionary project financing.
  • Environmental or political pushback could lead to litigation, higher mitigation costs or operational restrictions.

More from Trade Ideas

Buying Broadcom After the Drop: Tactical Long on a Calmer AI Story Jun 5, 2026 GeoPark Short Thesis: Valuation Looks Toppy While Argentina Remains the Wildcard Jun 5, 2026 Caterpillar: Backing the AI Data-Center Buildout with Power & Energy Momentum Jun 5, 2026 Backblaze: Positioned for an AI-Driven Revenue Acceleration and Margin Inflection Jun 5, 2026 Reckitt Benckiser: Buying a Cheap P/E and a 4.3% Yield Near the Low Jun 5, 2026