Stock Markets February 25, 2026

State Attorneys General Ask DOJ to Scrutinize Netflix-Warner Brothers Deal

A coalition of 11 state prosecutors raises antitrust and theatrical industry concerns as the proposed acquisition moves toward federal review

By Sofia Navarro WBD
State Attorneys General Ask DOJ to Scrutinize Netflix-Warner Brothers Deal
WBD

Eleven state attorneys general have urged the Department of Justice to undertake a comprehensive review of Netflix's proposed acquisition of Warner Brothers, warning that the transaction could concentrate market power in Subscription Video on Demand services, harm consumers through higher prices and lower-quality content, and damage the theatrical motion picture business.

Key Points

  • A group of 11 state attorneys general asked the Department of Justice to thoroughly review Netflix’s planned acquisition of Warner Brothers, citing risks to competition in streaming and potential consumer harm.
  • The letter references a private Clayton Act lawsuit in the Eastern District of California that argues the deal could eliminate HBO Max as a competitor and substantially lessen competition.
  • State officials warned that the merger could disrupt the theatrical release model and harm movie theaters still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent industry strikes.

Eleven state attorneys general have formally requested that the Department of Justice perform a detailed antitrust review of Netflix's proposed purchase of Warner Brothers, citing risks to competition, consumers, and the theatrical film sector.

In a letter dated Tuesday addressed to Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed Assefi, the group warned that the merger could reduce competition in the Subscription Video on Demand market and adversely affect both content quality and pricing for subscribers. The submission was led by Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen and was signed by the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.

The state officials referenced an ongoing private lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of California that seeks to block the acquisition under the Clayton Act. That complaint alleges the deal would substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly, in part by eliminating HBO Max as a distinct competitor in the streaming marketplace.

A central concern highlighted in the letter is the potential for vertical foreclosure of content libraries that rival streaming services rely on. The attorneys general cautioned that if Netflix absorbs Warner Brothers' content, competing platforms could lose access to critical titles and other input necessary to compete effectively, which in turn could allow a dominant owner to raise subscription prices while offering a narrower slate of programming of lower quality.

The letter also raised alarms about possible consequences for the theatrical motion picture business. The state officials noted earlier comments attributed to Netflix's chief executive that labeled movie theaters as an outdated concept. They said that background fact increases concern that Netflix could change or abandon Warner Brothers' existing theatrical release strategy if the acquisition proceeds.

Representatives of the exhibition sector have voiced alarm as well. Cinema United, a trade group representing major theater chains including AMC and Regal, characterized the proposed deal as culturally catastrophic. The attorneys general emphasized that the timing of the proposed consolidation could be particularly damaging to theaters, which are still in recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and have been affected by recent Hollywood labor strikes.

Specifically, the state officials argued that allowing Netflix to acquire Warner Brothers on the current timeline could deprive the exhibition sector of important cash flows at a moment when cinemas are preparing for two significant years on the box office calendar. The attorneys general framed that timing as an added reason for the Department of Justice to undertake careful scrutiny.

Finally, the coalition offered to support the Department of Justice in its review of the proposed transaction, signaling a willingness to assist federal regulators as they evaluate the competitive and industry-specific implications.


Context note - The article reports on the contents of the attorneys general's letter and the referenced lawsuit, and on statements attributed to industry groups and a chief executive as presented in the letter and supporting materials.

Risks

  • Potential reduction in competition within the Subscription Video on Demand market, which could affect subscription prices and content quality - impacts streaming platforms, consumers, and content producers.
  • Vertical foreclosure of content libraries, which could limit rivals’ access to essential programming and disadvantage competing streaming services - affects streaming competitors and content licensing markets.
  • Damage to theatrical exhibition revenues if Warner Brothers' theatrical release model is altered or abandoned, particularly at a time when cinemas are recovering from pandemic-related losses and strikes - impacts movie theaters and related exhibition sector cash flows.

More from Stock Markets

UiPath Shares Slip After Anthropic Buys Vercept to Boost Claude’s App Interaction Feb 25, 2026 ByteDance Valuation Climbs to $550 Billion as General Atlantic Seeks to Sell Stake Feb 25, 2026 Analysts Start Coverage of Angel Studios With Buy Ratings, Highlight Guild-Led Membership Growth Feb 25, 2026 White House to Convene Major AI and Data Center Firms on Consumer Power Costs Feb 25, 2026 London Stocks Close Higher; U.K. 100 Index Hits Record as Banks and Miners Rally Feb 25, 2026