Stock Markets February 17, 2026

New York City Pension Funds Sue AT&T Over Exclusion of Workforce Diversity Vote

Funds allege company wrongly blocked shareholder vote on race, ethnicity and gender breakdown after halting public disclosures

By Derek Hwang
New York City Pension Funds Sue AT&T Over Exclusion of Workforce Diversity Vote

Four New York City public pension funds filed a federal lawsuit accusing AT&T of improperly preventing shareholders from voting on a proposal that would compel disclosure of the company’s workforce composition by race, ethnicity and gender. The funds argue AT&T’s reliance on a recent SEC allowance to exclude proposals is unfounded and seek to block proxy solicitations that omit their measure.

Key Points

  • Four New York City public pension funds filed suit in Manhattan federal court alleging AT&T wrongly blocked a shareholder vote on a proposal to disclose workforce composition by race, ethnicity and gender.
  • The funds argue AT&T relied on a November SEC policy allowing companies to claim a "reasonable basis" to exclude shareholder proposals, but contend SEC regulations do not justify blocking the vote at AT&T’s 2026 annual meeting.
  • Complaint notes AT&T submitted workforce diversity data to the EEOC and publicly disclosed it from 2021-2023, but ceased public disclosure in 2024 without explanation; plaintiffs seek to stop proxy solicitations that omit their proposal.

NEW YORK, Feb 17 - Four New York City public pension funds have launched a federal lawsuit against AT&T, asserting the telecom giant improperly declined to permit a shareholder vote on a proposal seeking disclosure of the racial, ethnic and gender breakdown of its 133,000-employee workforce.

Filed in Manhattan federal court, the complaint contends AT&T relied on a November policy shift by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to justify excluding the funds' proposal from its proxy materials. That SEC change allows companies to assert a "reasonable basis" for omitting shareholder proposals from ballots.

The pension funds maintain that, under SEC regulations, AT&T has no lawful basis to block a vote on the disclosure proposal at the company’s 2026 annual shareholder meeting. The complaint says the exclusion causes "irreparable" harm and asks the court to bar AT&T from soliciting shareholder proxies that omit the funds' measure.

According to the filing, AT&T already submits a workforce diversity breakdown to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on an annual basis. The plaintiffs say the company published that information publicly between 2021 and 2023, but stopped doing so in 2024 without providing an explanation.

AT&T did not immediately reply to requests for comment. A spokesperson for New York City Comptroller Mark Levine also did not immediately respond to a similar inquiry, the complaint notes.

The plaintiffs include the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and funds representing police officers, teachers and other educational employees.


The complaint places the dispute in the context of broader corporate practice and regulatory responses. It notes that each year hundreds of companies seek assurances from the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance that they will not face enforcement action if they exclude shareholder proposals from proxy ballots. The regulator has historically granted such relief roughly half the time, the filing says.

It also cites statements from SEC Chair Paul Atkins that many shareholder proposals run afoul of Delaware law, the state of incorporation for AT&T and about two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies.

Finally, the complaint observes a trend in which many companies have de-emphasized diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives following an announcement by President Donald Trump of a crackdown on such efforts. The filing references the president’s stated approach, which included a threat of federal civil litigation, made one day after he began his second term.

The suit seeks judicial relief to ensure shareholders can vote on the disclosure proposal at the 2026 meeting and to prevent AT&T from moving forward with proxy solicitations that exclude the funds' request.

Risks

  • Legal outcome uncertainty - The lawsuit's success is uncertain and could hinge on interpretation of SEC rules and Delaware corporate law, affecting corporate governance practices and investor rights; sectors impacted include telecommunications and corporate legal services.
  • Regulatory discretion - The SEC's historical practice of granting exclusion assurances about half the time creates unpredictability for shareholder proponents and companies, with implications for governance-focused investors and proxy advisory services.
  • Shifts in corporate DEI policies - Continued de-emphasis of diversity, equity and inclusion by companies could affect workforce disclosure norms and investor engagement strategies, particularly in large-cap sectors including telecommunications and other Fortune 500 firms.

More from Stock Markets

Market Turbulence Reinforces Case for Broader Diversification Feb 21, 2026 NYSE Holdings UK Ltd launches unified trading platform to streamline market access Feb 21, 2026 Earnings Drive Weekly Winners and Losers as Buyout Headlines Lift Masimo Feb 21, 2026 Barclays Sees 'Physical AI' Scaling to Hundreds of Billions by 2035 Feb 21, 2026 Germany's Wind Expansion Accelerates Amid Growing Questions Over Durability Feb 21, 2026