Stock Markets March 4, 2026

Judge Allows Class Action Claim That Allstate Tracked Drivers via Cellphones to Proceed

Federal court permits Wiretap Act and FCRA claims against insurer and its analytics arm; some state-law claims also survive

By Avery Klein ALL
Judge Allows Class Action Claim That Allstate Tracked Drivers via Cellphones to Proceed
ALL

A federal judge in Chicago ruled that proposed class members may pursue claims that Allstate tracked drivers through cellphone data without consent, used that information to influence coverage and pricing, and sold it to other insurers. The decision allows allegations under the Federal Wiretap Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act to move forward against Allstate and its data analytics unit, Arity, while dismissing three of 38 claims and leaving additional state-law claims intact.

Key Points

  • Federal judge allowed proposed class to pursue claims that Allstate tracked drivers via cellphone data and monetized that information.
  • Plaintiffs allege Arity, Allstate's analytics unit, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by producing inaccurate driving reports, including misclassifying passengers as drivers.
  • Court permitted state-law claims in 20 states to proceed and consolidated 15 private lawsuits; three of 38 claims were dismissed. Insurance sector and data analytics practices are implicated.

A federal judge in Chicago has allowed a consolidated class action accusing Allstate Corp of unlawfully tracking drivers through their cellphones to go forward, finding that the plaintiffs may pursue claims that include alleged violations of federal privacy and consumer reporting laws.

In a ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Daniel said proposed class members can attempt to prove that Allstate monitored motorists' travel locations and driving behaviors - including trip distances, speed, acceleration, braking, phone usage and attention to the road - and then sought to monetize that information by raising premiums, denying coverage or selling the data to other insurers.

The plaintiffs also contend that Arity, the insurance group's data analytics unit, violated the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act by generating inaccurate reports about driving conduct, for example classifying people as drivers when they were passengers. According to the complaint, Arity's tracking software was incorporated into consumer-facing apps, including Fuel Rewards, GasBuddy, Life360 and Routely, which is owned by Allstate.

Judge Daniel permitted the proposed class to press claims under the Federal Wiretap Act for electronic monitoring of location and motion data and under the Fair Credit Reporting Act for allegedly erroneous reporting of driving records. The court also allowed the drivers to pursue claims under the laws of 20 U.S. states. The judge dismissed three of the 38 claims raised by the plaintiffs.

The litigation in court merges 15 private lawsuits brought against Northbrook, Illinois-based Allstate. Separately, the state of Texas filed a similar complaint against Allstate in January 2025, according to the record.

Allstate pushed back in court, arguing that the plaintiffs did not allege with sufficient specificity that the company actually captured their data or that their insurance rates increased as a result. The insurer also pointed to privacy policies that disclosed the possibility of data collection.

Insurers generally, including companies such as Progressive and the unit of Berkshire Hathaway that operates Geico, use telematics systems to monitor driving habits. Industry proponents say telematics can reward safer driving with lower premiums.

Neither Allstate nor its lawyers immediately replied to requests for comment on Wednesday. Lawyers representing the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Is ALL a bargain right now? The fastest way to find out is with a Fair Value calculator that uses a mix of 17 industry valuation models to estimate value. That tool is promoted as a means to evaluate ALL and other stocks.

Risks

  • Ongoing litigation could create legal costs and reputational risks for Allstate and its data unit - affects insurance sector and data analytics vendors.
  • If plaintiffs ultimately prevail, insurers using telematics may face increased regulatory or legal scrutiny, potentially complicating pricing models - impacts insurance pricing and telematics providers.
  • Uncertainty remains because the court dismissed three claims and Allstate disputes key factual allegations, including whether it captured the plaintiffs' data or raised their rates - legal and evidentiary risks for plaintiffs.

More from Stock Markets

Tech Shares Propel U.S. Stocks Higher as Bitcoin Posts Strong Gain Mar 4, 2026 DOJ Opens Antitrust Inquiry Into Major Fertilizer Producers Mar 4, 2026 Big Tech Trade Group Warns Pentagon That Labeling Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk Could Disrupt Access to AI Tools Mar 4, 2026 Morgan Stanley Flags AI Infrastructure Providers as Enterprise Adoption Turns Pragmatic Mar 4, 2026 Tesla UK Deliveries Fall Sharply in February as Competition from Chinese Brands Rises Mar 4, 2026