Stock Markets February 14, 2026

Jefferies Says U.S.-Japan Economic Pact Is Underpriced by Institutions

A $550 billion investment framework boosts export access and defense ties, but institutional interest may lag

By Hana Yamamoto
Jefferies Says U.S.-Japan Economic Pact Is Underpriced by Institutions

Jefferies analysts argue that a new $550 billion U.S.-Japan investment arrangement presents material commercial and strategic opportunities that institutional investors have not yet fully priced. The deal reduces reciprocal tariffs, prioritises energy, AI infrastructure and critical minerals processing, and carries firm timelines and profit-allocation mechanics. Rising Japanese defense procurement and deep existing financial linkages add further market relevance.

Key Points

  • Jefferies highlights a $550 billion investment deal that reduces reciprocal tariffs from 25% to 15%, expanding U.S. export access across manufacturing, aerospace, agriculture, energy, autos and industrial goods - sectors likely to see increased commercial activity.
  • The pact prioritises energy, AI infrastructure and critical minerals processing, with the first project expected by March; the U.S. is positioned to retain 90% of project-level profits after costs are recovered and all funding must be allocated by Jan. 19, 2029.
  • Security and financial links strengthen the case for market relevance: Japan held $819 billion in U.S. FDI stock at end-2024, had $1.2 trillion in Treasury holdings by Nov. 2025, hosts roughly 55,000 U.S. troops, and plans a 3.8% rise in defense spending to $58 billion in FY26.

Jefferies is flagging a growing U.S.-Japan partnership across trade, investment and security as more consequential than many institutional investors apparently appreciate. Analyst Aniket Shah told clients this week that a recently outlined $550 billion investment deal could prove a central catalyst for expanded bilateral economic activity.

The package includes a tariff adjustment that lowers reciprocal levies from 25% to 15%, a move Jefferies says will broaden export access for U.S. firms active in manufacturing, aerospace, agriculture, energy, autos and industrial goods. The accord additionally places priority emphasis on energy, AI infrastructure and critical minerals processing, with Jefferies noting the first project under the framework is expected to be operational by March.

Jefferies also set out the financial mechanics it sees as notable: the U.S. is "positioned to retain 90% of project-level profits once costs are recovered," and the arrangement imposes a deadline for fund allocation, with all funding required to be allocated by Jan. 19, 2029.

Beyond trade and investment, Jefferies expects an increase in defense exposure tied to Japan's procurement of additional U.S. systems, specifically citing Tomahawk deployments as an example of this dynamic.

The economic relationship is already extensive. As of end-2024, Japan held $819 billion in U.S. foreign direct investment stock, concentrated in manufacturing, electronics and financial services. Japan's holdings of U.S. Treasuries climbed to $1.2 trillion by November 2025, a sum $314 billion larger than the United Kingdom's, and Japan continues to be a major holder of U.S. equities, agency debt and corporate bonds.

Security ties provide an added layer of integration. Japan hosts approximately 55,000 U.S. troops and participates in multilateral groupings such as the Quad and U.S.-Japan-Korea cooperation. Japan has also signaled a stepped-up defense budget, with planned spending of $58 billion in fiscal year 2026, a 3.8% increase.

Jefferies identified six sectors likely to benefit from the pact: Power & Utilities, AI Infrastructure, Mining & Metals, Defense & Aerospace, Manufacturing & Logistics, and Pharma & Biotech. Taken together, the firm frames the agreement as providing broad economic and strategic openings for investors, even as it judges institutional recognition of those opportunities to be incomplete.

Risks

  • Timing and execution risk tied to project schedules - the first project is expected by March, which creates a defined near-term milestone for delivery in priority areas such as energy and AI infrastructure.
  • Funding allocation deadline - all investment funding must be allocated by Jan. 19, 2029, introducing a fixed timetable that could constrain project rollouts and capital deployment.
  • Market recognition risk - Jefferies asserts institutional investors have underappreciated the pact, meaning current market pricing may not yet reflect potential sector-level impacts across Power & Utilities, AI, Mining & Metals, Defense & Aerospace, Manufacturing & Logistics, and Pharma & Biotech.

More from Stock Markets

Indigenous Occupation Halts Operations at Cargill’s Santarem Terminal Feb 21, 2026 Market Turbulence Reinforces Case for Broader Diversification Feb 21, 2026 NYSE Holdings UK Ltd launches unified trading platform to streamline market access Feb 21, 2026 Earnings Drive Weekly Winners and Losers as Buyout Headlines Lift Masimo Feb 21, 2026 Barclays Sees 'Physical AI' Scaling to Hundreds of Billions by 2035 Feb 21, 2026