Stock Markets May 13, 2026 04:01 PM

Ford Rally Fueled by Morgan Stanley Note Spotlighting Ford Energy as Profit Catalyst

Analyst argues licensing pact with CATL and potential large-customer supply deals make Ford Energy an underappreciated margin driver

By Priya Menon F

Ford Motor Company shares jumped 13.18% in afternoon trading after a Morgan Stanley research note highlighted Ford Energy, the automaker's newly formed energy storage subsidiary, as a material and overlooked profit opportunity. The analyst emphasized Ford’s licensing agreement with CATL and suggested imminent supply deals with large commercial customers and hyperscalers could lift the energy business to positive EBIT by 2028. The move came alongside a solid Q1 report and an upward revision to full-year adjusted EBIT guidance.

Ford Rally Fueled by Morgan Stanley Note Spotlighting Ford Energy as Profit Catalyst
F

Key Points

  • Morgan Stanley analyst highlighted Ford Energy and its licensing deal with CATL as a strategic advantage for supplying compliant ESS systems in the US.
  • Analyst expects a reasonable likelihood of supply agreements with large commercial customers and potential hyperscalers in the near term, and projects Ford Energy could be EBIT-profitable by 2028 with $500M–$600M run-rate EBIT at 20 GWh.
  • Ford reported Q1 2026 EPS of $0.66 on $43.25 billion revenue (up 6% year over year) and raised full-year adjusted EBIT guidance to $8.5 billion - $10.5 billion; the stock’s rise outpaced peers amid these combined developments.

Overview

Ford Motor Company shares surged 13.18% in afternoon trading following a detailed research note from Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew S. Percoco that reframed Ford Energy as a substantial, but underappreciated, profit driver for the company. Percoco argued that Ford’s licensing arrangement with CATL gives Ford a rare position among domestic energy storage system (ESS) suppliers, and that the resulting competitive advantage could translate into commercial supply agreements and material earnings contribution over time.


What the analyst said

Percoco labeled Ford’s relationship with CATL a strategic competitive advantage for the Energy Storage business, writing: "We believe Ford’s relationship with CATL is an underappreciated strategic competitive advantage for its Energy Storage business. Through this relationship, Ford becomes a key supplier of compliant ESS systems to utility and data center customers in the US." He also flagged the likelihood of near-term commercial deals, noting: "We believe that there is a fairly high likelihood that Ford signs an energy storage system supply agreement with large commercial customers, and potentially hyperscalers, over the next few months."

Based on this view, Morgan Stanley projected that Ford’s energy operation could reach positive EBIT by 2028, estimating that at 20 GWh of production Ford Energy might generate $500 million to $600 million of run-rate EBIT. That prospective contribution is especially notable because Model e - Ford’s electric vehicle division - is expected to post a $4.25 billion EBIT loss in 2026 according to the same analysis.


Market context and reactions

The stock reaction to Percoco’s note was pronounced. Ford’s gain far outpaced movements among its large-cap peers: General Motors rose 0.4%, Stellantis advanced 2.7%, and Tesla added 3.9% in the session. The outsized move occurred against a broader macroeconomic backdrop where a hotter-than-expected producer price inflation print weighed on markets - the PPI jumped a seasonally adjusted 1.4% for the month versus an expected 0.5% - leaving most major indices under pressure. Even so, the S&P 500 managed a modest gain of 0.60%, the NASDAQ added 1.22%, and the Dow Jones edged down 0.16%.


Company financials and guidance

Coinciding with the analyst reappraisal of the energy business, Ford reported Q1 2026 earnings per share of $0.66 on revenue of $43.25 billion, a 6% increase year over year. Management also raised its full-year adjusted EBIT guidance to a range of $8.5 billion to $10.5 billion. These results provided a tangible earnings foundation that amplified investor attention on the Ford Energy thesis.

Ford had previously disclosed a $2 billion capital commitment to energy storage late last year. That commitment initially garnered skepticism in some quarters because it came at the same time the company recorded a $20 billion impairment charge tied to its EV operations. At the time Ford Energy’s announcement produced only a muted market reaction; it took Morgan Stanley’s detailed note to crystallize the view that the energy business could be a corrective to ongoing losses in the Model e division.


Why investors took notice

Investors appeared to re-rate Ford’s energy narrative for three main reasons set out in the research note and results: the licensing partnership with CATL that supports semi-vertical integration for ESS supply, the stronger-than-expected Q1 financials and raised guidance, and the stated probability of imminent supply deals with large commercial customers and potential hyperscalers. Together, those elements helped make Ford the standout performer in the S&P 500 during the session.


Conclusion

While the near-term path for Ford’s EV business continues to present headwinds, the Morgan Stanley note shifted investor focus to Ford Energy as a potential margin contributor that could partially offset EV losses over time. The stock’s sharp uptick reflects a reassessment of the value of Ford’s energy strategy when combined with the company’s current earnings trajectory and the prospect of commercial supply agreements in the coming months.

Risks

  • Model e division is expected to post a $4.25 billion EBIT loss in 2026, indicating ongoing pressure from EV operations that could offset gains from the energy business - this impacts automotive and electric vehicle supply chains.
  • Initial market reception to Ford Energy was muted when first revealed, suggesting investor skepticism remains and re-rating may depend on evidence of actual supply contracts - this affects market sentiment in autos and industrials.
  • A hotter-than-expected PPI reading pressured broader markets during the session, demonstrating macroeconomic volatility that could influence demand and margins across the auto and energy sectors.

More from Stock Markets

General Dynamics IT Secures Modification to Maintain Navy Personnel Platform May 13, 2026 Huntington Ingalls Fleet Support Group Wins $220.7 Million Navy Maintenance Award May 13, 2026 Mexico's S&P/BMV IPC Edges Up 0.22% as Industrials and Consumer Names Rise May 13, 2026 Colombian Market Closes Lower; COLCAP Drops 0.73% to Three-Month Low May 13, 2026 MOEX edges up as energy and mining names lead modest gains May 13, 2026