Stock Markets February 12, 2026

EU Aims to Smooth Approval Path for Cross-Border Mergers, Officials Say

Commission to propose merger-rule changes to favor pan-European deals and weigh innovation among other benefits

By Maya Rios
EU Aims to Smooth Approval Path for Cross-Border Mergers, Officials Say

European Commission plans to revise merger rules from 2004 to make pan-European acquisitions easier to approve, prioritizing arguments tied to innovation while also considering sustainability, resilience, investment and employment. A draft is expected in the spring for consultation before any rules are implemented.

Key Points

  • The European Commission plans to revise 2004-era merger rules to set conditions that could make pan-European deals easier to approve.
  • Draft proposals are expected in the spring for consultation before regulators implement any changes.
  • Benefits considered in merger assessments are being broadened to include innovation, sustainability, resilience, investment and employment; innovation arguments are seen as the most straightforward to quantify.

European companies that pursue acquisitions spanning multiple member states may find it easier to secure competition approval under a planned revision of the EU's merger framework, people with direct knowledge of the discussions said.

The European Commission is preparing to define criteria that will guide merger approvals as part of an overhaul of rules that date back to 2004. According to the sources, a draft version of the proposed changes will be published in the spring for public feedback ahead of any formal implementation by regulators.

The push to favour pan-European transactions is intended to help firms build scale so they can better compete with non-EU rivals. Business groups, and telecom operators in particular, have been calling for more flexible EU merger rules so they can consolidate and expand. The proposal also comes against a backdrop of efforts across Europe to reduce economic dependence on the U.S. and China.

Regulators are said to prefer pan-European consolidations over deals conducted at the national level, arguing that national deals can concentrate market power in the hands of a few domestic players. The Commission - which enforces competition rules within the EU - declined to comment on the matter.

Sources described how the discussion over which merger benefits should be taken into account by competition authorities has been narrowing. The list of potential benefits now being considered includes innovation, sustainability, resilience, investment and employment. Of these, innovation claims are viewed as the most persuasive, because the other factors are harder to quantify in merger assessments.

Under the traditional EU merger framework, regulatory scrutiny has focused on preventing transactions that would lead to higher prices for consumers or a reduction in available products. Critics argue that the current focus should be broadened to encompass a wider set of considerations - such as innovation and investment - when assessing the competitive impact of deals.


Implications for stakeholders

  • Companies pursuing cross-border consolidation may be better positioned if the Commission adopts pan-European-friendly criteria.
  • Telecommunications operators are among the sectors most explicitly seeking looser merger rules to achieve scale.
  • Regulators will need to balance traditional competition concerns about prices and product choice with newer considerations like innovation and investment.

Risks

  • Other potential benefits such as sustainability, resilience, investment and employment are harder to quantify, creating uncertainty for companies relying on those arguments in merger reviews - impacts regulators and dealmakers.
  • If national-level consolidations remain common, there is a risk of concentrated market power among a few domestic players, a concern for competition across several sectors including telecoms.
  • Timing and details of the rule changes remain uncertain until the Commission publishes the draft and completes consultation, leaving companies unsure how forthcoming deals will be assessed - affecting M&A planning.

More from Stock Markets

Chinese AI Stocks Rally as Investors Embrace Winners While U.S. Markets Worry Feb 21, 2026 Three Earnings Reports This Week Will Test the Durability of the AI Investment Theme Feb 21, 2026 Moscow Market Closes Flat as Select Large-Caps Offset Losses Feb 21, 2026 Honeywell Reconsiders Purchase of Johnson Matthey Catalyst Unit as Closing Obstacles Emerge Feb 21, 2026 Indigenous Occupation Halts Operations at Cargill’s Santarem Terminal Feb 21, 2026