Stock Markets March 18, 2026

DOJ Antitrust Chief Says Political Influence Will Not Expedite Paramount-Skydance Deal Review

Acting head of the DOJ antitrust division rejects claims of politicized enforcement as regulators and state attorneys general review the proposed Warner Bros Discovery acquisition

By Derek Hwang WBD
DOJ Antitrust Chief Says Political Influence Will Not Expedite Paramount-Skydance Deal Review
WBD

The acting head of the U.S. Department of Justice antitrust division said the proposed Paramount Skydance acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery will not receive preferential, politically driven treatment, denying that enforcement has been politicized and confirming regulators are conducting reviews and probes of competing bids and the transaction.

Key Points

  • DOJ antitrust acting chief Omeed Assefi said political connections will not speed up approval of Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery - impacts antitrust enforcement and media mergers oversight.
  • Paramount has been viewed by some analysts as potentially advantaged due to political ties connected to its CEO’s family - this perception affects investor sentiment in entertainment and media sectors.
  • Netflix previously pursued a competing bid that remained under DOJ review until it withdrew rather than match Paramount; California Attorney General Rob Bonta has announced a state-level probe - this creates multi-jurisdictional regulatory scrutiny for the deal.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed Assefi said in an interview on Wednesday that Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery will not be fast-tracked through antitrust review due to political considerations. "The idea that somehow enforcement has been politicized is ludicrous," Assefi said, declining to discuss ongoing investigations.

Speculation among analysts that Paramount might enjoy an easier path to U.S. regulatory clearance has focused in part on the company’s political connections. Paramount CEO David Ellison’s father, billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, has cultivated ties with President Donald Trump. Asked directly whether those ties would result in an easier review for Paramount, Assefi replied, "Absolutely not."

Assefi pointed to public comments by industry executives as evidence of even-handed treatment. "I think even Ted Sarandos has been very vocal about the fact that he had a very open and fair and thorough review under us," he said, referring to the CEO of Netflix.

Netflix had submitted a competing bid for Warner Bros’ studio and streaming assets, and that bid remained under department review until Netflix chose to withdraw rather than match Paramount’s offer. Paramount argues its agreement raises fewer competitive concerns than the rival Netflix proposal.

At the same time, the transaction has drawn scrutiny beyond the federal level. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has said the state is conducting its own probe of the deal.

The department’s public refusal to accept politicization allegations comes as market watchers and legal analysts continue to evaluate how multiple reviews and probes could affect the timetable and outcome of the proposed transaction. Assefi declined to provide details on the specific status of any ongoing probes.

Separately, promotional materials noting third-party tools and services have also referenced the transaction. One such service states that it evaluates Warner Bros Discovery alongside thousands of other companies using a wide range of financial metrics and AI-driven strategies, and that its system has identified notable past winners. The service also offers to indicate whether Warner Bros Discovery appears in its current strategies or if other opportunities in the sector may be preferable.

Risks

  • Ongoing federal and state probes could prolong the review timeline and introduce litigation risk - relevant to the media and entertainment sector as well as broader M&A markets.
  • Perceptions of political influence, whether accurate or not, could increase scrutiny and public attention, complicating negotiations and regulatory communications - affects investor sentiment in companies involved in high-profile deals.
  • Competing bids and differing assessments of competitive impact between parties may lead to contested outcomes or additional remedies imposed by regulators - impacts antitrust enforcement outcomes and strategic positioning in streaming and studio markets.

More from Stock Markets

MOEX Russia Index Edges Up 0.57% as Energy and Industrial Names Lead Gains Mar 18, 2026 Rocket Lab Shares Rise After $190 Million Hypersonic Flight Contract Mar 18, 2026 Bovespa Falls 0.43% as Basic Materials, Financials and Consumption Lead Declines Mar 18, 2026 Toronto market falls as materials and consumer sectors weigh; S&P/TSX Composite slips 1.87% Mar 18, 2026 U.S. Equities Slip as Consumer and Materials Names Weigh on Benchmarks Mar 18, 2026