BYD Takes U.S. Government to Court Over Tariffs, Seeks Reimbursement

Chinese automaker BYD has initiated litigation in the U.S. Court of International Trade, arguing that President Trump's tariffs lack statutory authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and requesting repayment of all tariffs the company has paid since last April. The filing, lodged on January 26 by four BYD U.S. units, represents the first time a Chinese carmaker has sued over these tariff measures and comes as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to weigh the legality of the tariffs more broadly.

Key Points

BYD filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade on January 26, contesting the legality of tariffs imposed under IEEPA and seeking refunds for levies paid since last April.
Four U.S. subsidiaries of BYD argue the text of IEEPA does not authorize tariffs, stating the statute does not use the word 'tariff' or an equivalent term.
BYD's U.S. operations include buses and commercial vehicles, batteries, energy storage systems, and solar panels; BYD North America reports 750 employees at its Lancaster, California truck plant. Sectors affected include automotive manufacturing, energy-related equipment, and international trade compliance.

Chinese automaker BYD has filed suit against the U.S. government, disputing the legal basis for recent tariffs and asking for refunds of all duties it has paid since last April. The complaint was submitted to the U.S. Court of International Trade on January 26 by four of BYD's U.S. subsidiaries.

In its filing, BYD's U.S. units contend that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act - the statute the administration has invoked - does not authorize the imposition of what the company describes as border taxes. The complaint argues that "the text of IEEPA does not employ the word 'tariff' or any term of equivalent meaning," and asserts the company is pursuing the case to preserve its right to seek refunds for tariffs already remitted.

The action marks the first lawsuit brought by a Chinese automaker challenging the Trump administration's tariff measures. It follows similar legal challenges from thousands of multinational firms with U.S. operations that have contested the administration's reliance on IEEPA to levy border duties.

BYD's U.S. footprint does not include sales of passenger cars in the United States, but the company operates a range of businesses in the country. Those operations include buses and commercial vehicles, battery products, energy storage systems, and solar panels. According to the company's website, BYD North America employs 750 workers at its truck plant in Lancaster, California.

The lawsuit arrives amid broader legal scrutiny: the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the tariffs. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has said the court is taking time to consider the matter, noting the "enormous" stakes involved.

President Trump has repeatedly expressed concern that Chinese cars could threaten the future of the U.S. auto industry, while at times indicating openness to Chinese automakers that manufacture vehicles on U.S. soil. BYD's filing is limited to contesting the statutory basis for the tariffs and seeking reimbursement for duties paid; the complaint itself frames the dispute in statutory terms rather than broader policy commentary.

Risks

Legal uncertainty over the validity of tariffs under IEEPA as the dispute proceeds through the courts; the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the broader legality.
Unclear outcomes for refunds sought by companies, including BYD, given ongoing litigation and competing interpretations of statutory authority.
Wider exposure for U.S. operations of multinational firms, since thousands of companies have challenged the administration's use of IEEPA to impose border taxes, leaving trade-sensitive sectors subject to continued legal and regulatory uncertainty.

Menu

Key Points

Risks

More from Stock Markets