Bank of America has identified a material risk to Asian economies that depend heavily on technology-related supply chains, warning that a disruption to liquefied natural gas (LNG) flows could produce widespread effects.
At the core of the bank's assessment is a scenario in which the Strait of Hormuz becomes effectively closed and Qatar suspends LNG production. Under those conditions, BofA notes, about 85% of the LNG that currently moves through Hormuz is destined for Asian markets, and there are few viable alternate routes for that volume of gas.
That routing concentration matters because many of the economies most exposed to technology supply-chain shocks - specifically Taiwan, Japan and South Korea - hold only a limited buffer of LNG on hand. According to BofA, these jurisdictions typically maintain inventories amounting to only a few weeks of supply, which would leave them vulnerable if shipments were interrupted.
The bank highlighted possible policy responses, saying government backstops could help limit the economic damage from such a shortage. However, BofA was careful to emphasize that government intervention could not fully erase the consequences of a significant supply shock.
Monetary policy implications are also addressed in the bank's note. BofA suggests central banks are unlikely to respond rapidly with tighter policy settings in reaction to an energy-driven spike. In the bank's central scenario, it assumes tensions in the Middle East would be short-lived; in that case, most central banks would be inclined to look through any temporary rise in energy prices rather than move quickly to tighten monetary policy.
The firm's LNG shortage concern is presented alongside other energy-related stresses already affecting the region, with the bank noting that oil supply pressures are also a factor for Asian economies.
Overall, BofA's analysis underscores a concentrated routing of LNG through Hormuz to Asia, limited alternative transport options, short domestic reserve horizons in key tech-linked economies, a role for government backstops that is helpful but not definitive, and a central-bank response that is unlikely to be swift tightening in reaction to a temporary price spike.