Stock Markets March 18, 2026

BMG Takes Anthropic to Court Over Use of Song Lyrics in AI Training

Publisher alleges Claude developer reproduced lyrics from Bruno Mars, the Rolling Stones, Ariana Grande and others while building its language models

By Leila Farooq
BMG Takes Anthropic to Court Over Use of Song Lyrics in AI Training

BMG Rights Management has filed a federal lawsuit in California accusing Anthropic of copying and reproducing copyrighted song lyrics to train the large language models behind its Claude chatbot. The complaint alleges hundreds of infringements, cites 493 specific examples, and comes amid a wave of similar lawsuits by authors, publishers and news organizations against AI developers. Anthropic previously reached a separate settlement with authors and faces an ongoing suit brought by Universal Music Group and other publishers.

Key Points

  • BMG Rights Management sued Anthropic in U.S. federal court in California, alleging unauthorized copying and reproduction of song lyrics used to train the Claude large language models - affecting the music publishing sector and AI developers.
  • The complaint cites 493 specific instances of alleged infringement and claims hundreds of copyrights were violated; statutory damages can reach up to $150,000 per work if willfulness is found - relevant to the legal and financial exposure for technology firms.
  • Anthropic previously settled a separate lawsuit brought by a group of authors for $1.5 billion, and Universal Music Group and other publishers have an ongoing related lawsuit against Anthropic from 2023 - highlighting continued legal pressure on AI training practices.

Music publisher BMG Rights Management has sued artificial intelligence startup Anthropic in U.S. federal court in California, alleging that Anthropic used copyrighted song lyrics to train the large language models that power its Claude chatbot. According to the complaint filed on Tuesday, BMG says Anthropic copied and reproduced lyrics from hit songs by artists including the Rolling Stones, Bruno Mars and Ariana Grande, among other well-known rock and pop musicians.

The filing asserts that the company infringed hundreds of copyrights and specifically cites 493 examples that BMG contends were used without authorization. Under U.S. copyright law, statutory damages for infringement can vary widely - from several hundred dollars to as much as $150,000 per work if a court determines the violation was willful.

This action is part of a broader string of high-profile legal challenges brought by authors, news organizations and other copyright holders against technology companies that have used proprietary material to train large language models and related chatbots. BMG noted that its lawsuit follows similar litigation from multiple rights owners that question how training data has been collected and employed.

Universal Music Group - identified in the filing as a competitor of BMG - and other music publishers previously filed a related case against Anthropic in 2023 that remains active. Separately, Anthropic reached a settlement last year in a different AI training dispute brought by a group of authors, resolving that matter for $1.5 billion.

Requests for comment sent to spokespeople for the companies did not receive immediate replies on Wednesday, according to court filings and correspondence cited in the complaint. In public defenses of their practices, many AI developers have argued that use of copyrighted works in model training can qualify as fair use because the material is transformed in the process of creating new outputs.

Beyond the legal claims, the broader market has seen observers and services that evaluate music and technology companies spotlight questions about how such litigation might affect commercial valuations and investment decisions. For example, some AI-driven stock-analysis services highlight whether major music companies such as Universal Music Group are included in strategy portfolios; those services also point to past stock performance examples when discussing risk and opportunity in the sector.


Legal posture and next steps

BMG's complaint demands relief for the alleged infringements and frames the matter as one of unauthorized copying of creative works. The case will proceed through the federal court system, where the parties may exchange discovery, and judges will evaluate the factual record and the parties' legal arguments concerning copyright law and potential defenses such as fair use.

Risks

  • Potential for substantial statutory damages if courts find willful infringement - risk primarily for AI companies and their investors due to possible financial liabilities.
  • Ongoing and accumulating litigation from writers, publishers and news organizations creates legal uncertainty for the AI development and content licensing markets.
  • Unclear resolution on the scope of fair use for transforming copyrighted material into training data could affect licensing costs and practices within the music and technology industries.

More from Stock Markets

FAA Clears Boeing 777-9 to Enter Fourth Certification Phase, Sources Say Mar 18, 2026 Markets Eye Housing, Jobs, and Philly Fed Data Ahead of Key Thursday Releases Mar 18, 2026 Artelo Biosciences Shares Rally After Agreement to Test ART27.13 in Glaucoma Patients Mar 18, 2026 TD Cowen Identifies Two Telecom Names Set to Gain from AI Datacenter Buildout Mar 18, 2026 Grail Shares Rise After TD Cowen Lifts Rating Despite Trial Setback Mar 18, 2026