Stock Markets February 16, 2026

Australian Court Orders A$16 Million Penalty for Mobil Over Misleading Fuel Claims

Mobil Oil Australia admits to promoting additive benefits at nine Queensland sites despite supplying unadditised fuel

By Leila Farooq
Australian Court Orders A$16 Million Penalty for Mobil Over Misleading Fuel Claims

A Federal Court of Australia has fined Mobil Oil Australia A$16 million (about $11.3 million) after the company admitted it misled customers about the composition and benefits of fuel sold at nine Mobil-branded petrol stations in Queensland between August 2020 and July 2024. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said signage and branding promoted alleged additive benefits, while the fuel supplied was the same or substantially the same as unadditised fuel available at other retail sites. Mobil has agreed to make joint submissions with the ACCC to the court on proposed orders, including penalties.

Key Points

  • Federal Court of Australia fined Mobil Oil Australia A$16 million for misleading claims about Mobil Synergy Fuel.
  • Misleading conduct took place at nine Mobil-branded petrol stations across north and central Queensland; fuel supplied was the same or substantially the same as unadditised fuel at non-Mobil sites.
  • ACCC said on-site signage and branding promoted additive benefits, and Mobil will make joint submissions with the ACCC on proposed court orders and penalties.

The Federal Court of Australia has imposed a A$16 million penalty on Mobil Oil Australia for misleading advertising related to fuel sold at a group of Mobil-branded petrol stations in Queensland, the country’s competition regulator said on Tuesday.

Mobil Oil Australia, which supplies petroleum, diesel and other fuel products to retailers in Australia and is owned by Exxon Mobil, admitted to the court that it made false claims to consumers concerning its "Mobil Synergy Fuel." The admissions cover a period from August 2020 through July 2024, according to the regulator.

ACCC investigators found the conduct took place at nine Mobil petrol stations located in the north and central Queensland communities of Aitkenvale, Barcaldine, Berserker, Biloela, Guthalungra, Proserpine, Rasmussen, Rural View and Yeppoon. The regulator said the fuel provided to those sites was the same or substantially the same as unadditised fuel available at other non-Mobil retail locations.

According to the ACCC, the misleading statements were communicated through a variety of on-site signage and branding that promoted the supposed advantages of Mobil Synergy Fuel. The regulator said customers have no practical way to independently verify fuel composition and must rely on retailer information displayed at forecourts.

"Petrol is an essential good for most households, and there is no way of knowing what youre putting in your tank other than relying on the signage provided by the retailer," ACCC Deputy Chair Mick Keogh said.

Keogh added that it was likely some motorists chose to refuel at the affected Mobil sites believing they were receiving a different quality of petrol with specific benefits for their engines. The ACCC said the company's conduct breached Australian consumer law.

Mobil has agreed to make joint submissions with the ACCC to the court about proposed remedies and penalties. The regulator described the admissions and the proposed joint submissions as part of the next steps in court proceedings.

The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The A$16 million fine converts to roughly $11.3 million using the exchange rate noted in the regulatory filing (A$1 = $0.7065 - presented in the original reporting as $1 = A$1.4152), reflecting the penalty in both local and U.S. dollar terms.


Contextual notes:

  • The ACCC initiated court action in 2024 against Mobil Oil Australia alleging misleading representations about fuel.
  • The company admitted the misleading conduct in the Federal Court and will participate with the regulator in proposing final orders and penalties.

Risks

  • Uncertainty around final court orders and the specifics of any additional remedies or compliance measures - affects legal and regulatory risk for fuel retailers and parent companies.
  • Consumer reliance on retailer signage to assess fuel quality highlights ongoing disclosure and trust issues in the fuel retail sector - impacts consumer protection and retail reputation.
  • Potential reputational and compliance implications for Mobil Oil Australia and its parent company, which could influence retail partnerships and brand perception in regional markets.

More from Stock Markets

Indigenous Occupation Halts Operations at Cargill’s Santarem Terminal Feb 21, 2026 Market Turbulence Reinforces Case for Broader Diversification Feb 21, 2026 NYSE Holdings UK Ltd launches unified trading platform to streamline market access Feb 21, 2026 Earnings Drive Weekly Winners and Losers as Buyout Headlines Lift Masimo Feb 21, 2026 Barclays Sees 'Physical AI' Scaling to Hundreds of Billions by 2035 Feb 21, 2026