Politics March 18, 2026

Wolfe Research Maps Three Possible Trajectories for Iran Conflict

Analyst outlines best, base and worst cases through November and details likely market responses

By Derek Hwang
Wolfe Research Maps Three Possible Trajectories for Iran Conflict

Wolfe Research presented three scenarios for how the conflict in Iran could unfold, ranging from a swift dominance by U.S. forces to a prolonged ground campaign. Analyst Tobin Marcus characterizes the situation as highly uncertain but places the highest probability on a base case that resembles the more optimistic path - a conflict stretching into April and ending in an informal ceasefire - while flagging potential for higher oil prices and broader market disruption in a prolonged-war scenario.

Key Points

  • Wolfe Research outlined three distinct scenarios for the Iran conflict - best, base and worst - with timelines extending through November; sectors affected include energy, equities and broader macroeconomic growth.
  • The base case, viewed as most probable, projects the war to stretch through April but end in an informal ceasefire, leading to a gradual normalization of crude prices toward futures levels.
  • A worst-case outcome with prolonged ground operations could keep oil "well over $100/bbl," slow the economy and potentially trigger a bear market, while the best case sees WTI falling under $80 by May and under $70 by July.

Overview

Wolfe Research issued a note on Wednesday laying out three distinct timelines for the conflict in Iran, reflecting significant uncertainty about how events will proceed through November. The firm framed the exercise as a way to capture a range of possible outcomes rather than to assert a definitive forecast.


Analyst framing

Analyst Tobin Marcus wrote that "it’s very hard to get conviction at this point about how the war in Iran will go," and the team therefore sketched best, worst and base-case scenarios extending to November. The scenarios are intended to map plausible market and economic effects tied to different conflict trajectories.


Base case - the most likely outcome

Wolfe’s base case sits closer to the optimistic scenario. Marcus describes it as a conflict that "will stretch through April but not beyond," concluding with an informal ceasefire that nevertheless leaves "various loose ends unresolved." The firm identifies a likely turning point when former President Donald Trump determines that "the upside from continuing the war is no longer worth its cost, declaring victory, and starting to withdraw."

Under this path, Wolfe expects de-escalation to bring a gradual normalization in energy markets, with crude prices easing "in line with futures." The note points to tentative signs that could support a near-term resolution, including Iran selectively permitting friendly vessels to transit the Strait of Hormuz and a "very limited resumption of traffic."


Worst case - prolonged ground operations

The report treats a worst-case trajectory as less likely but possible. This scenario envisions open-ended ground operations, accompanied by additional U.S. military deployments. Marcus warns that in this outcome oil prices could remain "well over $100/bbl," the economy could slow, and markets could move into a bear phase.


Best case - rapid U.S. military success

Wolfe’s most optimistic scenario is summarized with the phrase "America tames a paper tiger." In that view, Iran "wasn't able to 'hold out for long against the most powerful military in human history, bombing at will with uncontested control of the skies.'" Even so, the firm expects oil markets would take time to normalize; it projects that WTI would be back under $80/bbl by May and under $70/bbl by July in this scenario.


Market implications across scenarios

Even in the base case where a ceasefire arrives by April, Wolfe expects energy prices to remain "somewhat elevated" and equities to "chop sideways" after any initial bounce until broader drivers - such as AI investment - reassert themselves. The analysis therefore implies continued sensitivity in energy, equity and macroeconomic indicators across outcomes.


Signals and uncertainties

The note highlights early indicators that could point toward de-escalation, notably Irans limited reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to friendly traffic. At the same time, the firm emphasizes the low conviction around any single path and the possibility that events could move toward the less likely but more damaging scenario of prolonged ground conflict.

This assessment is presented as a scenario exercise rather than a precise forecast, intended to help investors and market participants consider how different conflict trajectories might affect oil prices, economic growth and equity markets through November.

Risks

  • Escalation risk - If conflict evolves into prolonged ground operations and additional U.S. deployments, oil prices could remain elevated above $100/bbl and exert downward pressure on economic growth and equity markets.
  • Uncertainty in de-escalation - Even with a ceasefire, energy prices may stay "somewhat elevated" and equities could "chop sideways" until other growth drivers like AI investment regain prominence, creating near-term volatility for investors.
  • Low forecast conviction - The analyst stresses it is "very hard to get conviction" about the conflict's path, meaning scenario timing and market responses are uncertain and contingent on political and military decisions.

More from Politics

Senators to Press Trump Administration’s Top Security Officials on Iran Conflict Mar 18, 2026 GOP Seeks to Tie Democrats to Alleged Election Fraud as Voter ID Fight Unfolds Mar 18, 2026 Iran Conflict Reshapes Democratic Primaries, Intensifying Intra-Party Fights Mar 18, 2026 Senate Confirms Conservative Legal Activist to Federal Bench Amid Arbitration Controversy Mar 17, 2026 House Oversight Committee Subpoenas Former Florida Attorney General to Testify in Closed Epstein Inquiry Mar 17, 2026