Politics February 15, 2026

White House Border Czar Rejects Democratic ICE Reform Demands as Funding Standoff Persists

Tom Homan calls proposals 'unreasonable' while lawmakers trade accusations amid a partial DHS funding lapse

By Jordan Park
White House Border Czar Rejects Democratic ICE Reform Demands as Funding Standoff Persists

White House border czar Tom Homan dismissed Democratic demands for structural changes to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as unreasonable, saying he was not part of negotiations tying ICE reform to homeland security funding. Democrats pressed a 10-point reform list even as Republicans accused them of grandstanding by withholding support for a Department of Homeland Security funding bill. The department entered a partial funding lapse on Saturday but continues to operate most services considered essential.

Key Points

  • White House border czar Tom Homan called Democratic ICE reform demands "unreasonable" and said he was not part of funding-negotiation talks.
  • Democrats sent a 10-point list that includes ending racial profiling, banning masks for agents, and preventing warrantless entry into private homes.
  • The Department of Homeland Security entered a partial funding lapse but continues most operations because functions are deemed essential; partisan disagreement and a congressional recess may stall talks.

Tom Homan, the White House official tasked with overseeing border policy, on Sunday rejected Democratic proposals to overhaul U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, describing those requests as "unreasonable" and stressing that he personally was not involved in talks that would link ICE reform to funding for the Department of Homeland Security.

Homan's comments came during an appearance on CBS News' "Face the Nation," where he pushed back against a package of demands Democrats delivered earlier this month to top Republican congressional leaders. The Democrats' list contains 10 specific items aimed at changing ICE practices, including ending racial profiling in stops, banning officers from wearing masks that obscure their identities, and prohibiting agents from entering private homes without a judicial warrant.

Responding to allegations of racial profiling, Homan said ICE officers do not single out people based on race and make stops on the basis of "reasonable suspicion." The article referenced a Supreme Court ruling from last year that allows officers to consider factors such as brown skin or speaking Spanish when deciding to stop someone.

On the subject of masks, Homan defended agents' use of face coverings, saying they are needed to protect officers by concealing identities. Critics, however, have pointed out that most U.S. law enforcement officers perform duties without face coverings, a contrast they view as notable in assessing ICE tactics.

The standoff over ICE reforms is unfolding against a backdrop of a partisan dispute over DHS funding. Democrats have pushed for reforms as a condition for backing a spending bill to fund the department, while Republicans have accused Democrats of grandstanding by refusing to support the legislation. DHS slipped into a partial funding lapse on Saturday, though the department continues to function because the bulk of its operations have been designated essential.

Political figures weighed in on the debate over the weekend. On "Fox News Sunday," Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware said public outcry had persuaded the White House to enter negotiations on ICE even though DHS still retains funding for some period. On CNN's "State of the Union," Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma called the Democrats' strategy "political theater," accusing them of not negotiating in good faith.

Negotiations face another practical hurdle: both chambers of Congress are scheduled to be on recess this week, creating the possibility that talks could remain at a standstill while lawmakers are away. The combination of partisan accusations and the congressional schedule has left the timing and progress of any deal uncertain.


Context note: The reporting here is constrained to the factual statements and claims described above. Where details are limited in the statements made by officials and lawmakers, those limitations are reflected rather than supplemented.

Risks

  • A partisan deadlock over DHS funding could prolong uncertainty around department operations and procurement cycles - potentially affecting homeland security contractors and vendors.
  • Escalation of political accusations and public scrutiny of enforcement tactics could create operational and reputational risks for ICE and related agencies - impacting federal agency staffing and contracting decisions.
  • Negotiations could remain stalled while Congress is on break, leaving policy changes and budget resolution unresolved for an indeterminate period - increasing short-term uncertainty for government services tied to border security.

More from Politics

U.S. proposal would suspend asylum work permits until processing times fall, DHS says Feb 20, 2026 Trump Banner Appears at Justice Department Headquarters, Part of Broader Push to Stamp Presidential Identity on Federal Buildings Feb 19, 2026 Florida Legislature Votes to Rename Palm Beach International Airport for President Trump Feb 19, 2026 U.S. Proposal Would Relax Nuclear Safeguards in Draft Saudi Pact, Document Shows Feb 19, 2026 Commission of Fine Arts Gives Unanimous Approval to $400 Million White House Ballroom Plan Feb 19, 2026