Politics February 13, 2026

Trump Says He Will Enforce Voter ID for Midterms Via Executive Action

President signals intent to require proof of citizenship for November voting even if Congress does not pass legislation

By Sofia Navarro
Trump Says He Will Enforce Voter ID for Midterms Via Executive Action

President Donald Trump announced plans to mandate voter identification for the November midterm elections by issuing an executive order if necessary, while supporting a House-passed bill that faces slim prospects in the Senate. He did not detail the legal basis for unilateral action and reiterated a promise to present what he called an "irrefutable" legal argument.

Key Points

  • President Trump said he will seek to require voter ID for the November midterm elections and plans to issue an executive order on the matter.
  • He is supporting a House-passed bill mandating proof of citizenship to vote, but that bill is not expected to progress in the Senate.
  • The Constitution vests election administration with state and local governments, creating a potential conflict with any federal executive action.

WASHINGTON, Feb 13 - President Donald Trump said on Friday he will move to require voter identification for the November midterm elections whether Congress enacts such measures or not, and that he intends to issue an executive order addressing the issue. He did not provide a legal justification for how the federal executive could impose such a requirement, nor did he offer specifics about the forthcoming order.

Trump is publicly supporting a bill approved by the House of Representatives that would require proof of citizenship to vote in U.S. elections. That measure, however, is not expected to gain traction in the Senate, where floor action is unlikely. The legislation is the most recent iteration of election-related proposals that first surfaced during the 2024 presidential campaign and that were motivated by the former president's assertions about the 2020 election.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said: "I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future!" He offered no further explanation about the legal theory he referenced.

The U.S. Constitution assigns primary responsibility for administering elections to state governments, and most voting operations are carried out by county and local officials. The contrast between federal action and state control of elections underscores a core structural tension surrounding efforts to change voting rules nationally.

Republicans control narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress. Despite that, the House-passed bill faces low odds of advancing in the Senate. The article of legislation is the latest in a line of measures that Congress has considered previously; similar proposals cleared the House on two occasions - last April and in 2024 - but failed to secure approval in the Senate.

Incumbent presidents' parties traditionally lose seats in midterm elections, a political reality noted alongside the unfolding policy dispute over voter identification and voting requirements. The president's public statements leave open the question of how an executive order would interact with state authority over election administration and with other branches of government.


Summary

President Trump announced his intention to require voter ID for the November midterms through an executive order if Congress does not act, while backing a House-passed proof-of-citizenship bill that is unlikely to advance in the Senate. He claimed to be developing a strong legal argument but provided no details.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over the legal basis for a federal executive order on voting requirements could prompt legal challenges - affecting the judicial and government administration sectors.
  • A lack of Senate support for the House-passed bill leaves legislative avenues limited, increasing political and policy risk for election administration.
  • Potential friction between federal directives and state-run election systems could create operational disruptions at county and local election offices.

More from Politics

U.S. proposal would suspend asylum work permits until processing times fall, DHS says Feb 20, 2026 Trump Banner Appears at Justice Department Headquarters, Part of Broader Push to Stamp Presidential Identity on Federal Buildings Feb 19, 2026 Florida Legislature Votes to Rename Palm Beach International Airport for President Trump Feb 19, 2026 U.S. Proposal Would Relax Nuclear Safeguards in Draft Saudi Pact, Document Shows Feb 19, 2026 Commission of Fine Arts Gives Unanimous Approval to $400 Million White House Ballroom Plan Feb 19, 2026