Politics March 12, 2026

OPM Reviews Cost and Scope of Federal Election Observer Program Targeting Racial Discrimination

Agency, in consultation with Justice Department, weighs $2.5 million 2025 outlay and potential reforms amid court-ordered deployments in three jurisdictions

By Hana Yamamoto
OPM Reviews Cost and Scope of Federal Election Observer Program Targeting Racial Discrimination

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management said it is assessing whether the roughly $2.5 million spent in 2025 on a federal election observer program aimed at addressing race discrimination in voting is justified, and whether changes are needed. The review, conducted with input from the Justice Department, comes as the program operates under narrow criteria and is active in three jurisdictions under court order. The effort follows long-standing legal constraints stemming from a 2013 Supreme Court ruling and is being scrutinized amid political debate over voting rules ahead of the November midterm elections.

Key Points

  • OPM is reviewing about $2.5 million in 2025 spending on a federal election observer program - impacts government budgeting and civil rights enforcement resources.
  • The program is limited to cases where the attorney general has received a "written meritorious complaint" of race discrimination - this legal threshold shapes deployment and judicial exposure.
  • Observer operations are active under court orders in Union County, New Jersey; Pawtucket, Rhode Island; and two areas in Alaska - relevant to local election administration and legal services sectors.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced on Thursday that it is evaluating the expenses associated with a federal election observer program designed to address race discrimination in voting.

OPM said that, in consultation with the Justice Department, it is examining whether the program's costs - which were about $2.5 million in 2025 - are justified and whether the program should be reformed.

The agency emphasized that the observer effort is limited in scope. It is deployed only in situations where the U.S. attorney general has received a "written meritorious complaint" alleging race discrimination in voting, according to OPM.

OPM also noted that the current federal observer program operates in locations where court orders have been issued. At present, those locations include Union County, New Jersey; Pawtucket, Rhode Island; and two areas in Alaska.

The program's parameters reflect a narrower federal role in monitoring voting practices than existed prior to a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a case involving Shelby County, Alabama. That ruling removed a Voting Rights Act provision that had required certain states and local jurisdictions with histories of racial discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing voting laws.

OPM's statement reiterated the statutory and judicial context for the observer program, noting the role of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as a key legislative achievement of the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

The disclosure that OPM is reassessing the program's finances follows media reporting that the White House is considering ending funding for the election observer initiative intended to protect minority voting rights. The White House directed inquiries to the Justice Department. A Justice Department spokesperson, cited in that reporting, said the department has no plans to terminate its separate election monitoring program within the civil rights division.

The review unfolds as attention to election administration is heightened ahead of the November midterm elections. President Donald Trump’s Republican Party currently holds a narrow majority in both chambers of Congress, and the president has publicly urged Republican lawmakers to pursue voting restrictions prior to the elections.

OPM's evaluation with the Justice Department is focused on whether the program's 2025 expenditures are warranted and whether structural changes should be pursued; the agency did not announce any immediate decisions.

Risks

  • Potential funding cuts or program changes could affect civil rights monitoring and enforcement capacity - legal and nonprofit civil rights organizations may be impacted.
  • Political debate and pressure over voting rules ahead of the November midterm elections create uncertainty about program continuity and scope - relevant to government agencies and election administration vendors.
  • Judicial and administrative constraints resulting from the 2013 Supreme Court ruling and the high legal threshold for deployment limit how and where observers can be used - this affects local election officials and legal practitioners.

More from Politics

U.N. Committee Warns Trump Rhetoric on Migrants Could Fuel Discrimination and Violence Mar 11, 2026 California Officials Track Intelligence on Possible Iran-Linked Drone Strike Threat Mar 11, 2026 House Republicans Struggle to Unite Around Election-Year Affordability Package Mar 11, 2026 U.A.E. Struck by New Missile and Drone Barrage, Defense Forces Report Interceptions Mar 11, 2026 Trump State Department Nominee Withdraws After Controversial Comments Prompt GOP Dissent Mar 10, 2026