Politics February 19, 2026

Americans Say Epstein Files Underscore Elite Impunity, Poll Shows

Majority believe government is withholding names; partisan split on whether public should ‘move on’

By Derek Hwang
Americans Say Epstein Files Underscore Elite Impunity, Poll Shows

The publication of millions of records connected to Jeffrey Epstein has unsettled political and business circles and reached the British royal family, with a Reuters/Ipsos poll finding most Americans view the disclosures as evidence that powerful figures are rarely held to account and that the U.S. government is still concealing information about alleged clients.

Key Points

  • Majorities of Americans see the Epstein files as evidence that powerful people are rarely held accountable, affecting public trust in political and business leadership.
  • Three-quarters of respondents believe the U.S. government is still withholding information about Epstein's alleged clients, signaling concerns about transparency.
  • There is a sharp partisan split on whether the public should move on: 67% of Republicans say they are ready to move on versus 21% of Democrats; implications touch politics, corporate governance and reputational risk for implicated networks.

The release of millions of documents tied to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has sent ripples through politics, the corporate world and the British monarchy as new details illuminate the breadth of his social connections. The disclosures, which on Thursday preceded the arrest of King Charles' brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, have prompted widespread public reaction in the United States.

A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos online poll conducted Feb. 13-16 captured Americans' views on the so-called Epstein files and found notable levels of awareness and skepticism about official transparency.


Awareness and overall impressions

  • Forty-two percent of respondents said they had heard "a lot" about the Epstein files, while 47% reported they had heard "a little." About one in 10 Americans said they had not heard anything at all.
  • When presented with the statement that the Epstein files "show that powerful people in the U.S. are rarely held accountable for their actions," 69% said that phrase captured their views "very well" or "extremely well."
  • More than half of respondents - 53% - said their views were described "very" or "extremely" well by the statement that the Epstein files "have lowered my trust in the country's political and business leaders."

Concerns about withheld information

A substantial majority, 75%, told pollsters they believe the U.S. government is still hiding information about Epstein's alleged clients. The files concern Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to charges that included soliciting prostitution from a minor.

Partisan divide on whether to move on

Views diverged sharply along party lines about whether the country should stop focusing on the files. Two-thirds of Republican respondents (67%) said the statement "it's time for the country to move on from talking about the Epstein files" described their thinking at least somewhat well. By contrast, only 21% of Democrats said that statement captured their views at least somewhat well.


Poll methodology

The Reuters/Ipsos online poll gathered responses from 1,117 U.S. adults and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

As the releases continue to reverberate, the poll underscores both the level of public awareness about the disclosures and deep partisan differences over whether the matter should remain a focal point for national attention.

Risks

  • Erosion of public trust in political and business leaders, which could heighten political risk and affect policymaking and corporate reputations across multiple sectors.
  • Perception that the government is withholding information may fuel demands for further investigations or disclosures, creating legal and regulatory uncertainty for individuals and organizations mentioned in the records.
  • Partisan divisions over attention to the files may deepen political polarization and influence how institutions respond, with potential reputational and operational consequences for firms tied to implicated networks.

More from Politics

U.S. proposal would suspend asylum work permits until processing times fall, DHS says Feb 20, 2026 Trump Banner Appears at Justice Department Headquarters, Part of Broader Push to Stamp Presidential Identity on Federal Buildings Feb 19, 2026 Florida Legislature Votes to Rename Palm Beach International Airport for President Trump Feb 19, 2026 U.S. Proposal Would Relax Nuclear Safeguards in Draft Saudi Pact, Document Shows Feb 19, 2026 Commission of Fine Arts Gives Unanimous Approval to $400 Million White House Ballroom Plan Feb 19, 2026