Overview
President Donald Trump said Friday he plans to adopt an "even stronger" stance on tariffs following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that did not uphold his comprehensive tariff program. Speaking at a briefing, the president outlined a path forward that relies on alternative federal legal authorities to enact trade restrictions.
Legal route and statutes cited
During the briefing, Trump said he would turn to other statutes to support new tariff actions. He specifically mentioned the Trade Expansion Act and the 1974 Trade Act as potential legal frameworks he may use to implement future trade limitations. The remarks indicated an intent to shift from the authorities the court rejected to different statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
President's interpretation of the ruling
Trump characterized the Supreme Court's decision as one that ultimately strengthened his position on tariffs. He said the ruling made his authority to levy tariffs "more powerful," a description he used to explain why he believes new measures could be implemented more effectively. He also said that income from tariffs would increase under his adjusted approach.
Implications noted by the administration
The administration's public remarks framed the Supreme Court outcome not as a barrier but as a catalyst for pursuing different legal avenues. By pointing to alternative statutes by name, the president signaled the intent to continue using tariffs as a policy tool despite the court's move against his prior, broader measures.
Key takeaways
- President Trump intends to pursue an "even stronger" tariff strategy after a Supreme Court ruling went against his sweeping tariff measures.
- He said he will invoke alternative federal authorities, specifically citing the Trade Expansion Act and the 1974 Trade Act, to implement trade restrictions.
- Trump asserted the ruling increased his tariff powers and said tariff revenues would rise under his revised approach.
Context and limits
The president's statements reflect a plan to use other statutory authorities following the court decision. The briefing presented the administration's interpretation of the ruling and its intended next steps, but did not provide additional procedural details or timelines for new measures.