European Central Bank policymaker Peter Kazimir said on Monday that the ECB would need to see a pronounced change in the trajectory of the economy and inflation before considering an adjustment to its monetary policy stance.
Kazimir, who leads Slovakia's central bank and is commonly seen as a policy hawk, made the remarks in a blog post. He wrote: "Looking forward, it would take a major departure from our baseline scenario for me to consider recalibrating the policy setting." He added plainly, "For now, the baseline holds."
His comments arrive just days after the ECB decided to keep interest rates at their present levels. The policymaker reiterated the ECB's assessment that inflation risks are balanced, but emphasized that this judgement partly hinges on favorable movements in energy prices.
Kazimir highlighted opposing forces that could influence future inflation outcomes. He noted that stronger-than-expected economic growth could exert upward pressure on prices, while further appreciation of the euro could weigh on inflation by lowering import costs. In his words: "Any further appreciation will have to be evaluated against the relative strength of the euro area's economic performance and ultimately our medium-term inflation target."
He also underscored the unusually high degree of uncertainty surrounding the outlook. Kazimir said that volatility is likely to continue in the months ahead and described the overall situation as fragile.
The ECB has left interest rates on hold since it ended its rate-cutting cycle in June, maintaining its view that inflation will stay around its 2% target over the medium term. That stance has reinforced market expectations that policy will remain broadly unchanged through the rest of the year, with some participants pricing in possible rate increases in 2027.
Implications for markets and policy are conditioned on how actual inflation, energy prices and exchange rate movements evolve relative to the ECB's baseline. While Kazimir's statement does not signal an imminent shift in policy, it makes clear that a material divergence from current projections would be required to prompt reconsideration.