Economy February 13, 2026

January’s start-of-year price moves likely pushed U.S. consumer inflation higher

Economists expect a 0.3% monthly CPI rise as seasonal price-setting, tariff pass-through and data-center electricity demand lift costs; BLS seasonal adjustments may be revised

By Sofia Navarro
January’s start-of-year price moves likely pushed U.S. consumer inflation higher

Economists expect U.S. consumer prices to have risen in January by roughly 0.3% month-on-month, driven by typical start-of-year price increases, the pass-through from broad tariffs and stronger electricity demand from data centers. The Labor Department’s CPI report arrives after stronger job growth and a modest fall in the unemployment rate, and will include recalculated seasonal adjustment factors that could revise recent seasonally adjusted series.

Key Points

  • Monthly CPI likely rose 0.3% in January, matching December’s month-on-month gain; year-on-year CPI forecast at 2.5% (down from 2.7%).
  • Seasonal start-of-year price-setting and tariff pass-through are expected to be key drivers of the January rise; electricity costs rose due to strong demand from data centers powering AI.
  • BLS will publish updated seasonal adjustment factors reflecting 2025 price movements, which could revise seasonally adjusted series for the past five years; the report was slightly delayed by a three-day federal shutdown.

U.S. consumer prices are widely expected to have climbed in January as businesses implemented customary start-of-year price increases and as tariff-related cost pass-through continued to lift goods prices, economists said. The monthly rise in the Consumer Price Index would come alongside a stabilizing labor market, a combination that could give the Federal Reserve leeway to keep interest rates unchanged for some time.

Following data earlier this week showing an acceleration in payroll gains and a drop in the unemployment rate to 4.3% from 4.4% in December, the Labor Department’s consumer inflation report for January will provide another data point on how prices and the labor market are evolving.

"Firms tend to raise prices at the beginning of the year, after the holiday season," said Diego Anzoategui, an economist at Morgan Stanley. "Seasonal factors do not fully eliminate this pattern, so seasonally adjusted inflation prints tend to come in higher than during the rest of the year." Economists pointed to that recurring January pattern as a reason for expecting a stronger monthly CPI print.

A Reuters survey of economists predicted the CPI likely increased by 0.3% in January, matching December’s gain. Individual forecasts ranged from a 0.1% increase up to a 0.4% rise. On an annual basis, the CPI is forecast to have risen 2.5% in the 12 months through January, down from 2.7% in December - a slowdown mostly reflecting higher readings from the prior year rolling out of the year-on-year calculation.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics will publish recalculated seasonal adjustment factors with the January report to reflect 2025 price movements. Those new factors could lead to revisions of seasonally adjusted series going back five years. Economists, however, did not expect the updated seasonal factors - the statistical model the BLS uses to remove recurring seasonal variation - to eliminate the so-called January effect, a pattern in which CPI figures have tended to overshoot expectations each January.


The release was slightly delayed by last week’s three-day federal government shutdown. Economists noted that a longer shutdown last year prevented the collection of price data for October, which introduced volatility into the CPI series; they expected that some of that volatility would fade in the January release.

Food costs were expected to remain elevated after a sharp 0.7% jump in December that some economists linked to disruptions in price collection during the previous year’s extended shutdown. At the same time, recent moves by the Trump administration to roll back and cut tariffs on some imported food - including vegetables and bananas - were seen as likely to moderate food price pressures going forward.

On labor supply and its effect on food prices, economists offered differing takes. "While many migrant workers have likely left over fears of deportation, and the flow of new workers has slowed sharply, immigration policies have not had as much impact on farm labor as many had feared," said Dean Baker, senior fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. That, some economists argued, reduced the risk of severe agricultural labor shortages that would have pushed food prices much higher.

Energy costs presented a mixed picture. Gasoline prices were likely lower in January, but electricity costs were expected to have increased due to strong demand from data centers powering artificial intelligence applications, putting upward pressure on power bills.


Excluding the volatile food and energy components, core CPI was forecast to have risen 0.3% month-on-month after a 0.2% gain in December. Economists expected the turn-of-the-year markup in prices to appear in categories such as prescription drugs and motor vehicle insurance, among others. They also anticipated continued tariff pass-through into goods prices in areas like recreation, apparel and household furnishings.

"With demand holding firm, we see no compelling reason for companies to stop passing tariff costs through to consumers with only 40% of the cost increase clawed back," said Andy Schneider, a senior U.S. economist at BNP Paribas.

Services inflation was expected to show a mixed pattern in January. Some forecasters anticipated a moderation in price growth for hotel and motel rooms and airline fares after sharp increases in December, while rent and healthcare costs were forecast to maintain solid, steady gains.

On the broader policy front, the Federal Reserve watches the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index for its 2% inflation target; the CPI and PCE measures are both running above that goal. The Federal Reserve last month left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 3.50% to 3.75% range, a posture that could remain if inflation and labor indicators hold near expectations.

Some economists cautioned that additional tariff-related costs and the sustained weakening of the trade-weighted U.S. dollar over the past year could feed through to consumer prices this year. "Keeping in mind indications that additional tariff-related costs will pass through onto consumers this year, as well as the potential pass-through of the sustained weakening of the trade-weighted U.S. dollar over the past year, we continue to expect that inflation will re-accelerate for a time this year," economists at JPMorgan wrote in a note.


As the January CPI figures are released, markets and policymakers will weigh the interplay of routine seasonal price-setting, tariff pass-through, sector-specific cost pressures such as electricity demand from data centers, and recent labor market strength in judging the near-term path of U.S. inflation.

Risks

  • Recalculation of seasonal adjustment factors could alter seasonally adjusted CPI readings for recent years, introducing uncertainty for analysts and markets (affects macroeconomic analysis and market expectations).
  • Persisting tariff pass-through and a weaker trade-weighted dollar could re-accelerate inflation later in the year, sustaining price pressures for goods and services (impacts consumer goods, retail, and household goods sectors).
  • Data-collection disruptions from federal shutdowns have previously introduced volatility into CPI readings, complicating near-term interpretation of inflation trends (affects policymakers, forecasters and fixed-income markets).

More from Economy

Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Narrows Presidential Tariff Options, Treasury Secretary Says Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Curbs Emergency Tariff Authority, Sparking Market and Policy Reactions Feb 20, 2026 Brazil Says U.S. Supreme Court Decision Restores Country's Edge in American Market Feb 20, 2026 Musalem Says Fed Stance Appropriate; One-for-One Tariff Replacement Would Barely Shift Outlook Feb 20, 2026