Economy February 12, 2026

Fed’s Current Stance Is More Restrictive Than Perceived, Miran Says; Inflation Not a Concern

Fed Governor argues for additional rate cuts to support the labor market while a Dallas Fed president voices opposition

By Marcus Reed
Fed’s Current Stance Is More Restrictive Than Perceived, Miran Says; Inflation Not a Concern

Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran warned that the central bank’s monetary stance may be tighter than widely believed and repeated his call for further interest-rate reductions. Miran said he does not view inflation as a pressing problem, citing low shelter inflation, and said looser policy should be used to support the labor market. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, who hosted the event, opposes additional cuts and is more focused on persistent inflation risks.

Key Points

  • Fed Governor Stephen Miran warned that current monetary policy may be tighter than commonly perceived and said this could threaten U.S. economic growth.
  • Miran stated he is not concerned about inflation, citing very low shelter inflation that can offset higher readings in other parts of the index, and urged continued easing to support the labor market.
  • Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan disagrees with further rate cuts, arguing policy is not substantially restraining the economy and expressing greater concern about persistent inflation.

Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran warned that the Fed’s present monetary-policy stance could pose a risk to U.S. economic growth, even as growth receives support from a range of administration policies, including tax cuts. Miran made his remarks on Thursday while speaking at an event hosted by the Dallas Fed.

Miran said the main danger is a misreading of how restrictive policy already is. "The biggest risk I think to the economy is that we’re misconstruing just how tight monetary policy is," he told the audience.

On inflation, Miran said he is not worried. He pointed to shelter inflation as a mitigating factor, arguing that low readings in that component can offset higher inflation elsewhere in the index. "I have a hard time being concerned about inflation because really, really low shelter inflation can compensate for more inflation in other parts of the index," he said.

Given that view, Miran advocated maintaining efforts to support the labor market through easier policy. "As long as I remain unconcerned about inflation, I think it makes sense to continue trying to underwrite the labor market with looser monetary policy, particularly as supply expands more than demand and the economy can grow without generating inflation," he added.

Miran’s stance is consistent with his recent record at the central bank. Before his appointment to the Fed, he served as an economic advisor at the White House. Since joining the Fed, he has been among the most vocal proponents of easier policy, urging larger reductions than were ultimately implemented across the last three policy reviews in the previous year. He also dissented in January when Fed policymakers voted 10-2 to keep the federal funds rate in the 3.50%-3.75% range.

At the same event, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan - who hosted Miran’s appearance - was identified as opposing further rate cuts. Logan’s view differs from Miran’s in important ways: she believes monetary policy is doing little to restrain the economy and places greater concern on persistent inflation rather than on the labor market. The president did not offer further public comment on Thursday about her economic outlook or monetary policy preferences.


The exchange highlighted an ongoing divide among policymakers over whether the central bank should shift toward easier policy to bolster jobs or remain more cautious because of inflationary concerns. Miran emphasized the potential for growth without renewed inflation given expanding supply relative to demand, while Logan signaled continued vigilance on inflation risks.

Risks

  • Misreading the degree of policy tightness could imperil U.S. economic growth - this risk directly affects the broader economy and labor market.
  • Divergent views within the Fed between officials pushing for easier policy and those prioritizing inflation control create uncertainty for monetary policy - this uncertainty can affect interest-rate-sensitive decisions across financial markets and business planning.
  • Persistent or stubborn inflation remains a concern for some policymakers, which could limit scope for further interest-rate cuts and influence inflation-sensitive sectors and wage dynamics in the labor market.

More from Economy

Supreme Court Term Spotlight: High-Stakes Cases Shaping Law and Policy Feb 20, 2026 Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Narrows Presidential Tariff Options, Treasury Secretary Says Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Curbs Emergency Tariff Authority, Sparking Market and Policy Reactions Feb 20, 2026 Brazil Says U.S. Supreme Court Decision Restores Country's Edge in American Market Feb 20, 2026