Economy March 2, 2026

EU scale-up could narrow battery price gap with China to about 30%, T&E says

Transport & Environment urges Made in Europe supports, arguing local production, efficiencies and incentives can cut costs substantially by 2030

By Hana Yamamoto
EU scale-up could narrow battery price gap with China to about 30%, T&E says

A report from Transport & Environment (T&E) finds that expanding battery manufacturing within the EU could reduce the price disadvantage versus Chinese-made cells from roughly 90% today to about 30% by 2030, provided local producers scale up and achieve efficiency gains. The group calls on the European Commission's forthcoming Industrial Accelerator Act and a clear 'Made in Europe' framework that includes consumer and corporate EV incentives.

Key Points

  • Scaling EU battery production and improving manufacturing efficiency could cut the price gap with Chinese-made batteries from about 90% to roughly 30% by 2030, lowering the per-kWh gap from $41 to $14.
  • The European Commission's planned Industrial Accelerator Act would prioritise locally produced goods with public money and target strategic sectors including batteries, solar, wind, hydrogen, nuclear and electric vehicles.
  • T&E recommends that Made in Europe support explicitly include EV tax rebates for private owners and for corporate car schemes to help narrow the effective cost differential.

Transport & Environment (T&E) said in a report published on Monday that boosting battery production inside the European Union could sharply reduce the current cost differential with batteries produced in China.

The report estimates the present gap of about 90% could be cut to approximately 30% by 2030 if EU manufacturing scales up and firms improve production efficiencies. T&E highlights several routes to lower unit costs, including reduced scrap rates, enhanced labour expertise and greater use of automation.

Specifically, the group projects potential savings that would bring the per-kilowatt-hour gap down from $41 to $14 by 2030. On a typical electric vehicle, that change translates into a cost difference of about 500 euros, which the report notes could be further reduced by public incentives or considered an insurance premium against export restrictions already enacted by China on certain critical minerals and rare earths.

T&E links the opportunity to the European Commission's planned policy initiative. The commission is due to propose an Industrial Accelerator Act that would require prioritising locally manufactured products where public funds are used. The proposed measure is intended to target key strategic sectors - including batteries, solar and wind energy, hydrogen manufacturing, nuclear power and electric vehicles.

Not all industry participants agree with local content mandates. Some automakers have warned that imposing local content requirements could raise battery costs to prohibitive levels and harm the competitiveness of their models.

"Europe needs a domestic battery industry as an insurance policy against its supply chains being weaponised. Local content requirements are the only policy on the table to avoid another Northvolt. The cost of Made-in-EU rules is a sovereignty premium worth paying," said Julia Poliscanova, T&E's senior director for vehicles & e-mobility supply chains.

T&E also argues that the EU's Made in Europe plan should explicitly ensure public support schemes cover EV tax rebates not only for private EV owners but also for employers and employees using corporate car schemes. The report stresses that the cost gap will only narrow if local content rules are structured so companies such as ACC, Powerco and Verkor can expand production.

Currency context provided with the report notes $1 = 0.8464 euros.


Overall, the T&E analysis frames a path where industrial scaling, manufacturing improvements and targeted public incentives could materially reduce the price penalty for EU-made batteries while strengthening supply chain resilience.

Risks

  • Local content requirements may increase battery costs to levels some automakers consider prohibitive, risking competitiveness for vehicle makers - impacting the automotive sector and EV market demand.
  • The cost reduction depends on scaling by EU manufacturers such as ACC, Powerco and Verkor; if these firms cannot expand production, the projected narrowing of the gap may not materialise - affecting manufacturing and industrial policy outcomes.
  • Supply chain vulnerability persists due to export restrictions on critical minerals and rare earths; reliance on these materials and related policy responses could affect energy, mining and vehicle industries.

More from Economy

Markets Retreat as Middle East Violence Intensifies, Safe Havens and Oil Spike Mar 2, 2026 JPMorgan Lowers Gulf non-oil Growth Forecasts After Iran Conflict Escalation Mar 2, 2026 India's GDP Growth Moderates to 7.8% in Q3, Retains Top Spot Among Major Economies Mar 2, 2026 RBI Governor Says Interest Rates Likely to Remain Low for Extended Period Mar 2, 2026 Strained Passage: Oil Shipping Through Strait of Hormuz Disrupted by Gulf Attacks Mar 2, 2026