Economy March 12, 2026

Economists Still See Fed Cutting Rates in June Despite Iran War-Driven Inflation Risks

Reuters poll: Majority expect a June rate cut even as oil spikes and markets reprice timing of the first cut

By Nina Shah
Economists Still See Fed Cutting Rates in June Despite Iran War-Driven Inflation Risks

Economists surveyed in the Reuters March 6-12 poll largely expect the Federal Reserve to begin easing policy in June, despite a sharp rise in global oil prices tied to the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran that has pushed short-term yields higher and shifted market expectations for the first cut. All respondents foresee the Fed holding its policy range at 3.50%-3.75% at the March 18 meeting; most predict a single near-term cut to 3.25%-3.50% next quarter, with uncertainty about the total number of cuts this year.

Key Points

  • All 96 economists polled see the Fed holding rates at 3.50%-3.75% on March 18; about two-thirds (63 of 96) expect a cut to 3.25%-3.50% next quarter, most likely in June - impacts bond markets and short-term yields.
  • Global oil prices have risen roughly 40% amid the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, lifting two-year Treasury yields by nearly 30 basis points and prompting futures to push the first cut out to September - affecting energy, inflation-sensitive sectors, and fixed income markets.
  • PCE inflation is forecast to average 2.8% in H1 and 2.7% for 2026; labor data show a 92,000 drop in nonfarm payrolls and a steady unemployment rate at 4.4% - relevant to consumer-facing sectors and financial institutions' economic outlooks.

Overview

Economists who responded to a Reuters poll conducted March 6-12 continue to expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates for the first time this year in June, even as the conflict involving Iran has injected additional upside pressure into already-elevated inflation readings. The survey of 96 economists found unanimous expectations that the Fed will keep the federal funds rate at 3.50%-3.75% at its March 18 meeting.


Markets and energy

Global energy markets have shifted sharply since the onset of the conflict at the end of February. An approximate 40% rise in oil prices has pushed the yield on the rate-sensitive two-year U.S. Treasury note up by nearly 30 basis points. That move has altered market pricing for when the first rate reduction might occur; interest rate futures have moved out to September as the likely timing for the first cut, and market-implied pricing has diminished the likelihood of a second cut this year.


Poll findings on timing and magnitude of cuts

Although futures pricing has shifted later, poll respondents remain tilted toward a June easing. About two-thirds of economists in the survey - 63 of 96 - expect the Fed to lower the target range to 3.25%-3.50% next quarter, most likely in June, which follows the end of Chair Jerome Powell’s current term in May. There was no consensus on where policy would end the year; poll medians showed two cuts ahead of the November mid-term elections, but nearly 40% of respondents expect only one cut or none, roughly double the share that anticipates three or more reductions.


Labor market, inflation and forecasts

The poll captured mixed signals from the U.S. economy. Inflation, as measured by the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index - the Fed’s preferred gauge - is projected in the poll medians to average 2.8% in the first half of this year and 2.7% for 2026, a slight upward revision from the prior month’s medians. Meanwhile, labor data showed an unexpected decline in nonfarm payrolls of 92,000 last month, even as the unemployment rate, currently 4.4%, is expected to remain steady through the year.


Voices from the market and economists

Comments from economists who participated in the poll underscored the tension between inflation driven by energy-price shocks and a labor market that is neither strongly deteriorating nor markedly strengthening.

"It’s clear enough what Warsh has convinced the president he’s going to try to do, and we have to factor that into our forecasts...But then it’s a question of whether the committee dynamic and the data allow him to execute on that or not," said Jeremy Schwartz, a senior U.S. economist at Nomura. "He can probably get one or two cuts this year."

"The conflict with Iran is boosting global energy prices. That’s going to lead to some headline inflation, but potentially also some pass-through into some core inflation components. Meanwhile, the underlying trend in the labor market is not strong, but it doesn’t seem to be deteriorating either and that’s a situation where the Fed isn’t really forced into a kind of more reactive posture."

U.S. President Donald Trump, who has nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair, has repeatedly criticized Powell for not moving more quickly on rate cuts - a political element that some economists say must be considered when forming forecasts.

"Inflation has not been at the 2% objective in five years. If anything, inflation is set to move higher in the near term...Right now the inflation risk is greater than the labor market risk," said Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

"We are just recovering from the supply shock caused by the tariffs and now we have another in the form of the war with Iran. Under Powell, that means they’re just sitting on their hands and waiting for data to come in," said Philip Marey, senior U.S. strategist at Rabobank. "The risk to our outlook is more towards fewer and possibly later cuts...but Trump would really like the cuts before the mid-terms rather than after."


Additional poll detail

An extra question in the survey drew 37 responses, of which 29 - nearly 80% - said it is more likely the Fed will hold rates longer than economists currently expect rather than move to cuts more quickly. On growth, respondents projected the U.S. economy to expand between 2.1% and 2.5% per quarter this year, outpacing last quarter’s 1.4% pace and exceeding the Fed’s estimate of the non-inflationary growth rate of 1.8%.


Implications

The poll results reflect a split between a still-tight policy stance expected in the near term and market sensitivity to commodity-driven inflation risks. Economists remain divided on the ultimate number of cuts this year, even as a majority anticipate an initial easing in June.

Risks

  • Higher energy prices tied to the conflict with Iran could add to headline inflation and potentially feed into core inflation components - a risk to fixed income and interest-rate-sensitive sectors.
  • Market repricing of the timing and number of cuts introduces uncertainty for financial markets, including bonds and bank net interest margins, if easing is delayed or reduced.
  • Divergent economist views on the number of cuts this year create policy uncertainty that could affect corporate borrowing costs and investment decisions across sectors.

More from Economy

CFTC Opens Formal Rulemaking Process for Prediction Markets Mar 12, 2026 Singapore to seek clarification from USTR over trade data and Section 301 probe Mar 12, 2026 Administration to Temporarily Waive Jones Act to Ease East Coast Fuel Flows Mar 12, 2026 CFTC Division Issues Guidance as Prediction Market Trading Expands Mar 12, 2026 CFTC Seeks Public Comment on Rules for Prediction-Market Event Contracts Mar 12, 2026