Economy February 6, 2026

ECB to Broaden Euro Liquidity Lines as Part of Push to Strengthen Global Ties

Planned expansion of Eurep facilities aims to deepen use of the euro abroad while exposing Europe to new policy trade-offs

By Caleb Monroe
ECB to Broaden Euro Liquidity Lines as Part of Push to Strengthen Global Ties

The European Central Bank is preparing to widen access and relax terms for its euro repurchase agreement facility, known as Eurep, enabling central banks beyond the euro area to obtain emergency euro funding on more favourable conditions. The move is presented as part of a broader European strategy to bolster the single currency's international role and to complement trade and diplomatic outreach, but it also carries trade-offs tied to crisis exposure and political responsibility for euro liquidity.

Key Points

  • ECB plans to relax and broaden access to its euro repo facility (Eurep), lowering rates, standardising rules and easing borrowing caps to encourage wider international use of the euro - affecting banking, foreign exchange and sovereign debt markets.
  • The initiative is positioned as part of a broader European strategy to complement trade agreements and diplomatic outreach, reinforcing the euro's attractiveness as an alternative to the U.S. dollar - relevant to trade, investment and central banking relationships.
  • Market participants and some central banks are considering Eurep as a potential alternative to Fed swap lines for crisis dollar liquidity, which could shift how global central banks manage foreign-exchange backstops - impacting central bank operations and cross-border liquidity management.

The European Central Bank is advancing plans to make it easier for foreign central banks to borrow euros in times of market stress, a development that forms part of Europe's growing effort to attract trade partners and political allies while competing with the United States and China.

Under the policy changes being prepared by the ECB, central banks outside the euro area would gain enhanced access to emergency euro funding. Officials expect the revised arrangement to strengthen incentives for non-euro area institutions and markets to use the single currency for lending, investing and trading.

ECB President Christine Lagarde has framed the agenda as an attempt to seize what she has called the euro's "global moment" - a window of opportunity that her institution sees as opening amid doubts about the reliability of U.S. economic policy under President Donald Trump. European officials and economists argue that easier access to euro liquidity could reinforce the EU's wider international agenda by complementing recent trade agreements and by assuring investors that euro assets will remain liquid during episodes of market strain.

"The fact that alongside these free trade agreements, we could offer a repo facility would be smart," Ludovic Subran, chief investment officer at German insurer Allianz, said, noting the way such financial tools fit into economic diplomacy. Societe Generale chief executive Slawomir Krupa also expressed support for the plan, saying the initiative "supports growth...and the influence of our region".


How the facility works and the proposed changes

The mechanism at the centre of the plan is a repo facility that allows foreign central banks to borrow euros against euro-denominated collateral. Known as Eurep, the facility was introduced in 2020 during the COVID crisis and has been limited in scope. At present it is available only to eight neighbouring countries, including EU members such as Romania and Hungary as well as non-EU jurisdictions like Albania and Montenegro. Those existing arrangements have been subject to strict limits.

According to officials familiar with the plans, the ECB intends to lower the interest rate charged on these operations, standardise the operational rules and relax tight caps on the amounts central banks can borrow. The package of adjustments, expected to be announced soon, is aimed at increasing the attractiveness and usability of the euro internationally, where it remains a distant second to the U.S. dollar.

The proposal arrives as finance ministers are preparing to consider other measures designed to elevate the euro's role, including discussions about issuing euro-denominated stablecoins and the potential for joint EU debt. At the same time, middle powers across different regions are seeking new alignments and hedges against what some view as the growing unpredictability of the U.S.


Demand for alternative liquidity lines

Central bankers around the world have been deliberating whether they can continue to rely on the U.S. Federal Reserve to supply dollar liquidity during crises through its swap lines. In that context, some economists and market participants see an expanded Eurep as an alternative source of backstop liquidity in euros. Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac NZ, said an expanded Eurep facility could be "an opportunity for New Zealand." He added that the current U.S. administration's inward-looking stance may reduce the likelihood of the Fed providing swap-line support in a global liquidity crisis - a comment he posted on X.


Risks and policy trade-offs

Officials acknowledge the initiative carries risks even as it seeks to strengthen the euro's global position. Loans under the proposed scheme would be extended only against high-quality, euro-denominated collateral, which should limit direct credit and foreign exchange exposure for the ECB. Nevertheless, the extension of liquidity to institutions outside the euro area raises difficult questions about how the ECB and euro zone governments would respond if foreign borrowers running euro-denominated liabilities encountered trouble.

Subran warned that providing a liquidity facility in the context of distress at a commercial bank abroad could create complex follow-up questions for European policymakers. The dilemma echoes the long-standing critique captured by a 1971 remark from then U.S. Treasury Secretary John Connally that the dollar was "our currency, but your problem" - a formulation pointing to the fact that a currency's international role can shift burdens onto other countries when problems arise. European policymakers are unlikely to be able to adopt such a flippant posture because of the institutional and political differences surrounding the euro.

The euro is comparatively young. Launched 27 years ago, it is not underpinned by a single treasury or a common deposit insurance scheme and still bears the legacy of a sovereign debt crisis in the early 2010s that almost threatened the currency's integrity. Those structural features, experts say, make the euro more vulnerable to contagion from stresses in countries that have unilaterally adopted the currency - in ways analogous to countries that have dollarised.

Rebecca Christie, a senior fellow at Bruegel, said: "The ECB is correct to be wary of euroisation because the euro is not a grown-up currency. The ECB has not had all of the tools that the Fed has and because of that they have to be much more careful about their reputation."


Outlook

The plan to broaden access to euro liquidity represents a deliberate policy choice by European authorities to pair financial instruments with diplomatic and trade outreach. Proponents argue it will encourage the international use of the euro and provide reassurance to investors and trading partners. Critics and cautious observers point to the potential for new exposures and political questions should foreign borrowers be unable to meet obligations denominated in euros.

As the ECB moves closer to formalising the changes to Eurep, markets and policymakers will watch closely for the balance struck between enhancing the euro's global footprint and protecting euro zone financial stability.

Risks

  • Although loans would be collateralised with high-quality euro assets, the ECB and euro zone governments could face difficult political and financial questions if foreign borrowers with euro-denominated liabilities experience distress - this risk primarily affects sovereign debt markets and regional banking sectors.
  • The euro's structural limits - no single treasury, no unified deposit insurance and lingering scars from the early 2010s debt crisis - make it more sensitive to crises originating in countries that use the euro unilaterally, potentially increasing contagion risks for euro zone financial stability and commercial banks.
  • Expanding euro liquidity provision could blur lines of responsibility and create expectations of support for non-euro jurisdictions, exposing the ECB to reputational risks and difficult policy choices during cross-border bank distress - a concern for central banks and international lenders.

More from Economy

SCOTUS Ruling on IEEPA Tariffs Offers Relief but Leaves Major Questions for Markets and Treasury Feb 21, 2026 USMCA Goods Largely Exempted From New 10% Global Tariff, But Review Threat Looms Feb 20, 2026 U.S. Trade Office to Open Broad Section 301 Reviews Covering Major Partners Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Term Spotlight: High-Stakes Cases Shaping Law and Policy Feb 20, 2026 Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026