Economy February 23, 2026

Dollar Weakens After High Court Rejects Broad U.S. Tariffs

Market reaction muted by geopolitical tensions and legal uncertainty over replacement levies

By Jordan Park
Dollar Weakens After High Court Rejects Broad U.S. Tariffs

The U.S. dollar softened as the Supreme Court ruled that a broad set of tariffs imposed by the administration exceeded presidential authority. Currencies including the euro, sterling and the Swiss franc strengthened, while uncertainty over refunds, potential litigation and geopolitical risks kept investors cautious.

Key Points

  • Supreme Court ruled that the president’s broad tariffs exceeded his authority, prompting markets to reassess policy risks and growth implications - sectors affected include foreign exchange and international trade.
  • The dollar weakened: euro rose to $1.1820, sterling to $1.3516, dollar to 154.40 yen; Swiss franc strengthened to 0.7727 per dollar - impacting currency markets and exporters/importers.
  • Replacement levies of 15% were imposed for 150 days, with unresolved questions on refunds and expected years of litigation - relevant for trade, manufacturing and aerospace sectors (zero-tariff items include aircraft and spare parts).

Global currency markets reacted on Monday to a high court ruling that struck down a wide swath of tariffs implemented by the U.S. president, with the dollar easing against several major peers. Traders treated the decision as potentially supportive for growth outside the United States, though concerns about regional tensions and legal ambiguity around replacement measures limited the scale of moves.

Through the Asia session - which saw thinner activity amid a public holiday in Japan and China’s Lunar New Year - the euro traded 0.4% higher at $1.1820, while sterling gained 0.3% to $1.3516. The dollar also fell 0.4% to 154.40 yen.

Policy developments at the center of the market shift stem from the Supreme Court’s finding last Friday that the president’s extensive tariff actions exceeded his statutory authority. In response, the administration announced a blanket 15% levy on imports and maintained that higher-tariff arrangements with trading partners should remain in place.

"It weakens the dollar in the sense that it potentially benefits non-U.S. growth," said Sim Moh Siong, currency strategist at OCBC Bank in Singapore. He noted, however, that longer-term foreign exchange consequences were mixed: lower U.S. revenues could weigh on the fiscal position and the dollar, yet curbing executive authority on trade may also remove a source of policy volatility.

Other currency moves included the New Zealand dollar trading a touch higher at just shy of 60 cents, while the Australian dollar dipped slightly to $0.7070 - a pair of moves shaped in part by the fact that U.S. tariffs on Australian goods had previously been set at 10%. The Swiss franc, often sought as a haven, jumped 0.5% to 0.7727 francs per dollar.


Market strategists framed the ruling as a constraint on the administration’s tariff toolkit. "This decision is another chip away at Trump’s power ... so that’s a positive for markets," said Jason Wong, strategist at BNZ in Wellington, while also warning that the interplay of factors left the situation difficult to trade.

Beyond the legal dispute over tariffs, investors were watching developments in the Middle East as the United States expands military presence to press Iran on its nuclear ambitions, and looking toward the president’s State of the Union address scheduled for Tuesday.

The administration’s interim replacement levies run for 150 days, with a key open question unresolved by the court: whether importers who already paid duties are entitled to refunds. The Supreme Court made no ruling on that point, leaving market participants and traders facing potential years of litigation and a period of activity-dampening uncertainty as efforts continue to find a more permanent tariff structure.

"It does reflect on the fact that the administration’s strategy to raise revenue is built on sources that could face significant uncertainty, while the propensity to spend continues to be high," said Tai Hui, Asia-Pacific chief strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. He added that such dynamics could keep bond investors attentive to questions of fiscal discipline.

European officials urged the United States to adhere to an agreement reached with the bloc last year that preserves zero tariffs on certain items, including aircraft and spare parts, emphasizing the need to respect sector-specific commitments.

Trading partners in Asia and global investors were described as cautiously weighing a fresh layer of uncertainty following previous misreads of market responses to the tariff measures - which, notably, had not reduced the U.S. trade deficit.

Looking back to the period before the president’s election, many investors had anticipated that tariffs would lift the dollar as other economies moved to loosen their currencies to protect exports. Instead, through 2025 the dollar fell - the dollar index dropped more than 9% - as markets focused on expectations for interest rate cuts, concerns about the U.S. fiscal deficit and the administration’s unpredictable policy manoeuvres.

"The key issue ... is that the Trump administration will be much more constrained in their ability to use tariffs in general," said Richard Yetsenga, ANZ’s group chief economist, on the bank’s podcast. "I don’t think this will change too much about the global economy."


With legal wrangling expected to continue and geopolitical developments adding to headline risk, currency and bond markets are likely to price in both the immediate effects of the court decision and the uncertain path of U.S. trade policy going forward.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty over whether importers will receive refunds for duties already paid, which could prolong litigation and dampen trade activity - impacts importers, customs authorities and legal sectors.
  • Geopolitical tensions stemming from U.S. military moves in the Middle East to pressure Iran add risk to markets and could reduce risk appetite - affects commodity, currency and safe-haven asset flows.
  • Fiscal pressure from potentially lower U.S. tariff revenues combined with high spending could concern bond investors and credit markets, influencing borrowing costs and fiscal outlook.

More from Economy

U.S. Customs to Halt Collection of IEEPA-Based Tariffs Starting Feb. 24 Feb 23, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Reopens U.S. Tariff Uncertainty, Firms Face New Choice Points Feb 23, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs Reopens Fiscal and Market Uncertainty Feb 23, 2026 Tariff Turmoil Sends Ripples Through Markets as Policy Rewrites Unfold Feb 23, 2026 Indonesia posts 54.6 trillion rupiah January deficit as revenues rise and spending climbs Feb 22, 2026