Economy February 9, 2026

BofA Says Warsh Would Face Headwinds Cutting Fed Balance Sheet Without Tighter Financial Conditions

Analysts argue the nominee may be more comfortable criticizing large bond holdings than executing a real reduction without policy and regulatory shifts

By Caleb Monroe
BofA Says Warsh Would Face Headwinds Cutting Fed Balance Sheet Without Tighter Financial Conditions

Bank of America analysts say Kevin Warsh, President Trump's nominee for Federal Reserve Chair, would likely encounter substantial obstacles in shrinking the Fed's sizable bond portfolio unless that effort is paired with tighter financial conditions or changes to bank liquidity rules. While Warsh has consistently criticized the Fed's asset purchases and advocated for a smaller balance sheet, BofA warns that pushing too aggressively on reductions could produce funding and market volatility and that Warsh may prefer maintaining easier financial conditions over rapidly shrinking reserves.

Key Points

  • BofA notes Warsh has been critical of the Fed's bond-buying and advocates a smaller balance sheet; however, they believe he may be more effective as a critic than as an implementer of reductions - sectors impacted: bond markets, financial institutions.
  • The Fed's balance sheet grew during crisis responses, fell from about $9 trillion in 2022 to $6.6 trillion late last year, and began expanding again in December to ensure liquidity and keep interest rates near the target range - sectors impacted: Treasury markets, short-term funding markets.
  • Analysts say shrinking the balance sheet likely requires lowering Fed liabilities through changes to bank liquidity guidance or regulations; absent that, reductions could threaten funding stability and broader market calm - sectors impacted: banking, broader capital markets.

Bank of America analysts argue that Kevin Warsh - President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve - would probably find it difficult to reduce the central bank’s large holdings of bonds unless such an effort coincided with a tightening of financial conditions.

Warsh has been an outspoken critic of the Fed’s bond purchase programs, saying those holdings can distort the broader financial picture and arguing in favor of a smaller balance sheet. The central bank’s asset pile swelled during crisis-response campaigns - including actions taken around the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic - before contracting from a peak of about $9 trillion in 2022 to roughly $6.6 trillion late last year.

However, the Fed began to expand the balance sheet again in December with the stated aim of ensuring sufficient liquidity so that interest rates remain near officials’ target range. It is not yet clear whether Warsh would seek to halt or reverse that resumption of growth.

In a research note, BofA strategists including Mark Cabana and Katie Craig said Warsh’s public criticisms of the Fed’s balance sheet do not guarantee he would be an effective architect of its reduction. The analysts wrote that they "suspect he would find it easier to be" a critic than to act as a "change agent."

The bank’s team said lowering the Fed’s holdings in size would likely require corresponding reductions in the central bank’s liabilities as well, possibly achieved through adjustments to bank liquidity guidance or regulatory changes. Without such liability reductions, they cautioned, an aggressive push to shrink the balance sheet could provoke funding dislocations, wider market turbulence, and tighter financial conditions.

"We suspect Warsh to favor easy fin[ancial] conditions over smaller Fed sheet, given difficulty of reducing Fed liabilities," the analysts said, suggesting that the nominee might opt to prioritize smoother financial conditions instead of pursuing rapid balance sheet contraction.

BofA also noted the political context, observing that President Trump would likely place more weight on the state of financial conditions than on the size of Fed reserves, and they said Warsh is "likely to side with Trump."

Warsh himself has acknowledged the practical challenges of shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet, pointing out that the balance sheet is a tool the central bank uses to help manage its target range for interest rates.


The debate over how and when to reduce the Fed’s asset holdings centers on the trade-offs between shrinking reserves and maintaining market stability. BofA’s view highlights a potential preference for preserving accommodative financial conditions over achieving a substantially smaller balance sheet unless structural changes to liabilities can be put in place first.

Risks

  • Aggressive attempts to reduce the Fed's balance sheet could cause funding volatility, disrupting short-term bank funding markets and liquidity provision.
  • A forceful push to shrink reserves might contribute to broader market volatility and tighter financial conditions, which could affect credit availability and asset prices.
  • Political pressures and preferences - including a presidential focus on financial conditions - may lead the nominee to prioritize easier financial conditions over achieving a smaller Fed balance sheet, limiting the scope for balance sheet reduction.

More from Economy

SCOTUS Ruling on IEEPA Tariffs Offers Relief but Leaves Major Questions for Markets and Treasury Feb 21, 2026 USMCA Goods Largely Exempted From New 10% Global Tariff, But Review Threat Looms Feb 20, 2026 U.S. Trade Office to Open Broad Section 301 Reviews Covering Major Partners Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Term Spotlight: High-Stakes Cases Shaping Law and Policy Feb 20, 2026 Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026