Economy February 11, 2026

Bithumb Cites Internal Control Failures After $40 Billion Bitcoin Transfer Error

Exchange says system lag and inadequate safeguards allowed 620,000 bitcoins to be mistakenly distributed during a promotion, prompting regulatory scrutiny

By Caleb Monroe
Bithumb Cites Internal Control Failures After $40 Billion Bitcoin Transfer Error

South Korea’s Bithumb told lawmakers that major shortcomings in its internal systems allowed an erroneous transfer of about 620,000 bitcoins to customers during a promotional event, a mistake the firm says amounted to roughly $40 billion and triggered a sharp drop in bitcoin prices. Company officials said processing delays and failed checks left the exchange vulnerable to sabotage and operational error; most coins were recovered but nearly 1,800 were sold before accounts were frozen.

Key Points

  • System failures at Bithumb allowed an accidental transfer of about 620,000 bitcoins during a promotional event, rather than 620,000 won, causing a 17% plunge in bitcoin’s price - sectors impacted: cryptocurrency exchanges, digital asset markets.
  • The mistaken giveaway equaled roughly 15 times Bithumb’s holdings of 42,000 bitcoins; a 24-hour processing lag and failed volume checks were cited as primary operational causes - sectors impacted: exchange operations, custodial services.
  • Most bitcoins were recovered, but 1,786 were sold before accounts were frozen; sellers are legally required to return the proceeds - sectors impacted: market participants, legal and compliance functions.

South Korea’s Bithumb acknowledged on Wednesday that critical weaknesses in its internal controls left the cryptocurrency exchange vulnerable to both sabotage and operational mistakes, culminating in an accidental distribution of roughly 620,000 bitcoins during a promotional event, the firm told a parliamentary committee.

Instead of crediting customers with 620,000 won - about $426 - the exchange says a system error caused the far larger bitcoin figure to be transferred. The error, which Bithumb CEO Lee Jae-won described as reflecting a serious deficiency in internal system control, coincided with a 17% fall in the price of bitcoin.

CEO Lee told lawmakers that the giveaway equaled about 15 times the exchange’s usual holdings of 42,000 bitcoins. He said the mismatch occurred because transaction processing experienced a lag of about 24 hours before balances of virtual assets were updated, and because the firm’s policy-checking mechanism failed to prevent the transfer.

Lee explained that the exchange’s procedure of verifying the volume of currency slated for transfer against its actual holdings did not operate as intended, and that the amount involved was not placed in a separate, designated account to secure the transaction. Those gaps, he said, exposed the platform to an avoidable and large-scale error.

Regulators said most of the bitcoins have since been retrieved by the exchange, but that 1,786 coins had already been sold within minutes before Bithumb froze the accounts of the customers who received them. Authorities stated that those who sold the mistakenly received bitcoins are legally required to return the proceeds.

Members of the national assembly voiced dismay at the apparent failures of both corporate risk controls and government oversight of the virtual assets market, noting that South Korea is among the most active markets in the world by trading volume for digital assets.

Financial Supervisory Service Governor Lee Chan-jin told the committee he personally believed the virtual currency sector should face the same regulatory oversight applied to banks and other financial firms, but that such supervision is not currently feasible under existing laws and regulations. The exchange rate cited by authorities during proceedings was $1 = 1,455.4700 won.


Context and implications

The episode highlights how system design, reconciliation timing and account segregation practices interact to determine operational resilience at large crypto platforms. While most funds were recovered, the rapid sale of part of the misplaced holdings and the immediate market response underscored how technical failures can translate into market volatility and legal entanglements.

Risks

  • Weak internal controls and delayed reconciliation can expose crypto exchanges to large, costly errors and market-moving events - impacts exchange stability and investor confidence in digital asset markets.
  • Current legal and regulatory frameworks may prevent authorities from applying the same oversight to virtual asset firms as to banks, leaving supervisory gaps - impacts financial regulators and systemic risk monitoring.
  • Rapid, unauthorized sales of mistakenly transferred assets can create market volatility and complicate recovery efforts, with legal processes needed to reclaim funds - impacts traders, settlement systems, and legal/compliance teams.

More from Economy

U.S. Trade Office to Open Broad Section 301 Reviews Covering Major Partners Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Term Spotlight: High-Stakes Cases Shaping Law and Policy Feb 20, 2026 Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Narrows Presidential Tariff Options, Treasury Secretary Says Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Curbs Emergency Tariff Authority, Sparking Market and Policy Reactions Feb 20, 2026